Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There are seven specific research objectives focusing on two practical areas of implementation for clinical decision support services: a) healthcare maintenance and preventive care screening, and b) two chronic disease conditions: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), and Adult-onset Diabetes Mellitus (AODM). The research objectives are: 1) Knowledge management lifecycle, 2) Knowledge specification, 3) Knowledge portal and repository, 4) CDS knowledge content and public web services, 5) CDS Dashboard, 6)Evaluation, and 7) Dissemination.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our approach to the project is iterative and cyclical: we will begin with a survey of the knowledge management lifecycle and supporting infrastructure (such as knowledge management systems, terminology services and data standards) at the participating clinical sites. We will then work together to define best practices for translating knowledge into a multi-layered array of human readable knowledge artifacts and public web services. At each point in this process, we will conduct careful evaluation, documenting lessons learned from each site. The ultimate work products will fall into three main categories:
First, tangible, actionable knowledge artifacts such as the shareable, human-readable and computable forms of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) under study, public web-services for CDS demonstrations, and a CDS Knowledge Portal and Repository to facilitate widespread adoption of these artifacts.
Second, detailed guidance and recommendations, based on what we learn from our combined efforts, for external parties such as the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT), the Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP), and the clinical practice guideline developer community.
Third, a set of knowledge and best practices, such as methods for the knowledge management lifecycle, development of both human readable knowledge artifacts and machine-interpretable knowledge, and management of decision-support related organizational change. We will share this knowledge through a variety of channels, such as presentations and academic papers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Services Demo at PHS and RI
Service based CDS intervention at PHS.
Service based decision support intervention
Delivering CDS via services
Normal CDS interventions at PHS and RI
Normal CDS intervention at both PHS and RI hospitals
Service based decision support intervention
Delivering CDS via services
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Service based decision support intervention
Delivering CDS via services
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH
Study Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Blackford Middleton, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Partners HealthCare - Information Systems, Wellesley Gateway
Wellesley, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Middleton B. The clinical decision support consortium. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:26-30.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Clinical Decision Support Consortium Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HHSA290200810010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id