Association of Type of Anesthetic and Outcomes in Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT ID: NCT02786264
Last Updated: 2023-04-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
186 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-05-31
2017-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Target Controlled Infusion of Etomidate or Propofol for Anesthesia of Thoracoscopic Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery
NCT02644980
Fully Automated Anesthesia, Analgesia and Fluid Management
NCT02886806
Effect of Sedation Strategy on Duration Mechanical Ventilation in Patient After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05451121
Propofol Effects on Mitral Valve Annular Velocity
NCT01826149
Desflurane Versus Propofol Anesthesia for Off-Pump CABG
NCT00528515
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis 1: TAVR surgery done under monitored anesthesia care are performed using some combination of the following anesthetics: dexmedetomidine, propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam.
Hypothesis 2: Age-adjusted dosing of these agents will be insufficient to account for extreme age after controlling for preoperative comorbid status.
Hypothesis 3: The rate of conversion to general anesthesia will be unrelated to the type of conscious sedation used.
Hypothesis 4: ICU length of stay, delirium, hospital length of stay, and length of hospital stay will be shorter for patients who were sedated using dexmedetomidine vs those without.
Research Plan: The research will be done via chart review and analysis of data already contained in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group databases at Yale. The possible risks are primarily the risk to privacy that is inherent in any retrospective chart review. The benefit may be to suggest areas of future study to improve sedation practices for TAVR at Yale and elsewhere. Information recorded will include demographic and preoperative medical assessment from prior to the TAVR, the anesthetic record, and the post-operative course of recovery for patients undergoing TAVR. These data will include age, gender, comorbidities, laboratory values, vital signs, and the results of imaging studies as well as other records potentially related to the above hospitalization.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Propofol-dominant Sedation
Patients receiving propofol infusion for TAVR as the primary drug for sedation.
Propofol
A propofol-dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of propofol within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This definition was subsequently modified to include patients who received propofol infusion but not dexmedetomidine.
Dexmedetomidine-dominant Sedation
Patients receiving dexmedetomidine infusion for TAVR as the primary drug for sedation.
Dexmedetomidine with propofol
A dexmedetomidine- dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This group was subsequently modified in light of retrospective data collection to specify a group receiving dexmedetomidine in combination with propofol.
Propofol
A propofol-dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of propofol within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This definition was subsequently modified to include patients who received propofol infusion but not dexmedetomidine.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine with propofol
A dexmedetomidine- dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This group was subsequently modified in light of retrospective data collection to specify a group receiving dexmedetomidine in combination with propofol.
Propofol
A propofol-dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of propofol within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This definition was subsequently modified to include patients who received propofol infusion but not dexmedetomidine.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Schonberger, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frohlich GM, Lansky AJ, Webb J, Roffi M, Toggweiler S, Reinthaler M, Wang D, Hutchinson N, Wendler O, Hildick-Smith D, Meier P. Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2014 Mar 10;12:41. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-41.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1604017590
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.