Association of Type of Anesthetic and Outcomes in Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement

NCT ID: NCT02786264

Last Updated: 2023-04-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

186 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study proposes to perform a descriptive analysis and pilot observational study looking at the types and quantity of anesthetic agents used and their associations with outcomes among patients scheduled to receive transfemoral aortic valve replacements (TAVR) at Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study proposes to perform a descriptive analysis and pilot observational study looking at the types and quantity of anesthetic agents used and their associations with outcomes among patients scheduled to receive TAVR at YNHH.

Hypothesis 1: TAVR surgery done under monitored anesthesia care are performed using some combination of the following anesthetics: dexmedetomidine, propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam.

Hypothesis 2: Age-adjusted dosing of these agents will be insufficient to account for extreme age after controlling for preoperative comorbid status.

Hypothesis 3: The rate of conversion to general anesthesia will be unrelated to the type of conscious sedation used.

Hypothesis 4: ICU length of stay, delirium, hospital length of stay, and length of hospital stay will be shorter for patients who were sedated using dexmedetomidine vs those without.

Research Plan: The research will be done via chart review and analysis of data already contained in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group databases at Yale. The possible risks are primarily the risk to privacy that is inherent in any retrospective chart review. The benefit may be to suggest areas of future study to improve sedation practices for TAVR at Yale and elsewhere. Information recorded will include demographic and preoperative medical assessment from prior to the TAVR, the anesthetic record, and the post-operative course of recovery for patients undergoing TAVR. These data will include age, gender, comorbidities, laboratory values, vital signs, and the results of imaging studies as well as other records potentially related to the above hospitalization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propofol-dominant Sedation

Patients receiving propofol infusion for TAVR as the primary drug for sedation.

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

A propofol-dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of propofol within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This definition was subsequently modified to include patients who received propofol infusion but not dexmedetomidine.

Dexmedetomidine-dominant Sedation

Patients receiving dexmedetomidine infusion for TAVR as the primary drug for sedation.

Dexmedetomidine with propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

A dexmedetomidine- dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This group was subsequently modified in light of retrospective data collection to specify a group receiving dexmedetomidine in combination with propofol.

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

A propofol-dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of propofol within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This definition was subsequently modified to include patients who received propofol infusion but not dexmedetomidine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine with propofol

A dexmedetomidine- dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This group was subsequently modified in light of retrospective data collection to specify a group receiving dexmedetomidine in combination with propofol.

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

A propofol-dominant anesthetic will be defined as an anesthetic that included a continuous infusion of propofol within 15 minutes of anesthesia start. This definition was subsequently modified to include patients who received propofol infusion but not dexmedetomidine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Precedex Diprivan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who underwent TAVR at YNHH under planned conscious sedation with monitored anesthetic care

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who received monitored anesthesia care without the receipt of any study intervention drug (propofol, fentanyl, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine).
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Schonberger, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Frohlich GM, Lansky AJ, Webb J, Roffi M, Toggweiler S, Reinthaler M, Wang D, Hutchinson N, Wendler O, Hildick-Smith D, Meier P. Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2014 Mar 10;12:41. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-41.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24612945 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1604017590

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.