Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Minimally Invasive AVR

NCT ID: NCT05864625

Last Updated: 2025-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-29

Study Completion Date

2025-06-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension, and be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. This study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension due to reduced cardiac contractility and vasodilation. This can be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse in extreme cases. Remimazolam is a relatively new anesthetic agent and it is a ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with a context sensitive half time of 7.5 minutes. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. Previous studies have also shown that remimazolam can be safely used in patients with severe aortic stenosis and in cardiac anesthesia induction and during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, there is no definite data on comparison of hemodynamic variables between remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and conventional propofol induction and sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. Therefore, this study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Stenosis Remimazolam

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remimazolam

Induction dose of 6 mg/kg/h of remimazolam with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL are injected together. When patient loses consciousness, rocuronium 0.8 mg/kg is given and endotracheal intubation is performed after confirming that TOF count is less than one. Anesthesia is maintained by using remimazolam dose of 1mg/kg/h\~2mg/kg/h with remifentanil to maintain optimal depth of anesthesia, which will checked by Sedline value between 25 to 50.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remimazolam besylate

Intervention Type DRUG

During induction, patients allocated to the remimazolam group will receive remimazolam 6mg/kg/h with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with remimazolam 1-2mg/kg/h combied with remifetanil.

Propofol/sevoflurane

1% propofol 1-2mg/kg is injected with remifentanil TCI 1\~4, and when patient loses consciousness, sevoflurane is started and rocuronium 0.8mg/kg is given. After confirming that TOF count is less than one, intubation is performed and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil to keep the Sedline value between 25 and 50.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol/ Sevoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

During induction, patients allocated to the P/S group will receive propofol 1% 1-2mg/kg with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remimazolam besylate

During induction, patients allocated to the remimazolam group will receive remimazolam 6mg/kg/h with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with remimazolam 1-2mg/kg/h combied with remifetanil.

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol/ Sevoflurane

During induction, patients allocated to the P/S group will receive propofol 1% 1-2mg/kg with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Remimazolam besylate, Byfavo Inj., Hana Pharm Col, Ltd., Seoul, Korea Fresofol 1% TM, Fresenius

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 19 years old
* Patients with severe aortic stenosis, undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with known allergy to benzodiazepine, flumazenil, propofol
* Patients with galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption
* Patients with hypersensitivity to Dextran40
* Patients who have been taking benzodiazepine for long term
* Patients with whom heart rate assessment is not accurate, such as atrial fibrillation
* Patients with end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis
* Patients with history of acute angle glaucoma
* Patients with valve disease severity of grade III or higher, other than aortic valve
* Emergency operation
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kim Hee Young

Assistant professor for fund

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hee Young Kim, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

05-2023-105

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.