Comparison of Propofol Based Versus Volatile Based Anesthesia and Postoperative Sedation

NCT ID: NCT01151254

Last Updated: 2014-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

All patients undergoing cardiac surgery require intraoperative anesthesia and short-term postoperative sedation with anesthetic agents after the procedure when patient is in the intensive care unit (ICU). The clinical data obtained so far are concentrating on intraoperative use volatile agents (preconditioning) resulting in better postoperative cardiac function and less release of biochemical markers of myocardial damage. There are no studies investigating whether postoperative use of volatile agents (post conditioning) in cardiac surgical population is improving outcomes. The aim of the present study is to compare total intravenous anesthesia and postoperative sedation versus total volatile anesthesia and postoperative sedation in cardiac surgical population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PA-Intravenous Sedation

Propofol based total intravenous anesthesia and postoperative sedation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type OTHER

Propofol for sedation in the CVICU

Volatile sedation

Total inhalational anesthesia and postoperative sedation with the AnaConda device

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Isoflurane/sevoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

Volatile for sedation in the CVICU while intubated

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Isoflurane/sevoflurane

Volatile for sedation in the CVICU while intubated

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Propofol for sedation in the CVICU

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

2-chloro-2-(difluoromethoxy)-1,1,1-trifluoro-ethane 2,2,2-trifluoro-1-[trifluoromethyl]ethyl fluoromethyl ether Diprivan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery with good ventricular function (grade 1-2 ventricle)
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing valvular surgery
* Severe kidney or liver disease (creatinine \> 2.5mg.dL-1 and bilirubin \> 2 mg.dL-1)
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the trial drugs (propofol, volatile anesthetics), e.g. propofol allergy or malignant hyperthermia (induced by volatile anesthetics)
* Patient with poorly controlled diabetes or on oral anti-diabetic medication (inhibit preconditioning caused by volatile anesthetics)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marcin Wasowicz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto General Hopsital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wasowicz M, Jerath A, Luksun W, Sharma V, Mitsakakis N, Meineri M, Katznelson R, Yau T, Rao V, Beattie WS. Comparison of propofol-based versus volatile-based anaesthesia and postoperative sedation in cardiac surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, study. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2018;50(3):200-209. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2018.0012. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29913033 (View on PubMed)

Pickworth T, Jerath A, DeVine R, Kherani N, Wasowicz M. The scavenging of volatile anesthetic agents in the cardiovascular intensive care unit environment: a technical report. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;60(1):38-43. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9814-5. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23132045 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UHN REB 06-0159 B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Controlled Propofol Administration
NCT01019746 COMPLETED PHASE4