Anesthesia and Lymphocytes Apoptosis

NCT ID: NCT01461551

Last Updated: 2015-05-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Most researches revealed that volatile anesthetic sevoflurane has a more marked cardioprotective effect against ischemia compared with intravenous agent propofol.However, propofol has been suggested to be more benefit for attenuation of surgery-induced immunosuppression.Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate under the specific OPCAB surgical stress, the influence of 3 established anesthetic techniques: sevoflurane, propofol and combine of sevoflurane and propofol maintained anesthesia on the apoptosis of circulating lymphocytes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sevoflurane

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sevoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 1.0-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration)

Propofol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

anesthesia was maintained with propofol (2-4 μg/ml via target-controlled infusion)

Combine of sevoflurane and propofol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

combine of sevoflurane and propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

anesthesia was maintained with a combine of propofol (1 μg/ml via target-controlled infusion) and sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.7-1.0 minimum alveolar concentration)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sevoflurane

anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 1.0-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration)

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

anesthesia was maintained with propofol (2-4 μg/ml via target-controlled infusion)

Intervention Type DRUG

combine of sevoflurane and propofol

anesthesia was maintained with a combine of propofol (1 μg/ml via target-controlled infusion) and sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.7-1.0 minimum alveolar concentration)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male adults
* aged 18-80 yr
* undergoing elective OPCAB surgery containing left anterior descending artery bypass

Exclusion Criteria

* a previous unusual response to any of the experimental anesthetics
* severe cardiac dysrhythmias or ejection fraction below 30%
* hemodynamic instability
* previous surgical coronary artery repair
* anemia, abnormal leukocytes or coagulopathy
* severe hypertension
* severe hepatic (albumin\<30g,ascites), renal (serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl) or pulmonary (preoperative pulmonary function tests moderate-severe) dysfunctions
* concomitant surgical procedures and psychiatric disorders
* Insulin-dependent diabetics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Li-Jie Jia

resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bu-Wei Yu, Ph.D., M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao tong University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ruijin Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jia L, Dong R, Zhang F, Wang W, Lu H, Luo Y, Xue Q, Yu B. Propofol Provides More Effective Protection for Circulating Lymphocytes Than Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Oct;29(5):1172-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26205644 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OPCAB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuroprotection During Open Heart Surgery
NCT04486690 COMPLETED PHASE3
Propofol vs Sevoflurane in Cardiac Surgery
NCT06729086 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA