Fully Automated Anesthesia, Analgesia and Fluid Management

NCT ID: NCT02886806

Last Updated: 2017-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluate the feasibility and quality of automated anesthesia, analgesia and fluid management based on a combination of several physiological variables (bispectral index \[BIS\], stroke volume \[SV\], and stroke volume variation \[SVV\]) using 2 independent physiologic closed-loop systems (PCLS) in patients undergoing high risk vascular surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Evaluate the feasibility and quality of automated anesthesia, analgesia and fluid management based on a combination of several physiological variables (bispectral index \[BIS\], stroke volume \[SV\], and stroke volume variation \[SVV\]) using 2 independent physiologic closed-loop systems (PCLS) in patients undergoing high risk vascular surgery.

All patients will receive total intravenous anesthesia in target controlled infusion mode using the population pharmacokinetic sets of Schnider for propofol and Minto for remifentanil to target the effect-site concentration. Infusion Toolbox 95 version 4.11 software (Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium) implemented in a personal computer serving as a platform for: calculating effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil; displaying effect-site concentration estimates in real time; providing a user interface that permits entry of patients' demographic data (sex, age, weight, and height) and modifications to target concentrations; controlling the propofol and remifentanil infusion pumps (Alaris Medical, Hampshire, United Kingdom); and recording calculated effect-site drug concentrations.

All patients will receive a baseline crystalloid infusion (PlasmaLyte, Baxter, Belgium) delivered by a pump at a rate of 3 mL/ kg/h (Fresenius Kabi, Belgium). Additional fluid was given using a goal-directed fluid therapy protocol guided by the cardiac output monitor (EV-1000; Edwards Lifesciences) and consisted of 100 mL boluses (Voluven, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) delivered by our PCLS (Learning Intravenous Resuscitator \[LIR\]). For fluid output, a Q-Core Sapphire Multi-Therapy Infusion Pump (Q-Core, Israel) was controlled by the LIR using software provided by Q-Core via a serial connection (Commands Server R.01). If hypotension occurred (defined as mean arterial pressure \<20% of baseline blood pressure) and no fluid is delivered by the LIR, it will be treated by the anesthesiologist using a vasopressor drug.

In this pilot study, each closed loop also will operate independently, guided only by its own respective inputs (BIS for the propofol; SV and SVV for the fluid boluses).

The investigators will also measure analgesia using the PhysioDoloris monitoring device (MDoloris Medical Systems, Lille, France).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

General Anesthetic Drug Overdose Adverse Effect of Intravenous Anesthetics, Sequela Complication of Anesthesia Drug Delivery System Malfunction Hemodynamic Instability Underdosing of Other General Anesthetics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

high risk vascular surgery

Patients scheduled for high risk vascular surgery under automated total closed loop intravenous anesthesia and fluid management

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BIS XP, Covidien, Ireland

Intervention Type OTHER

Closed loop for propofol and remifentanil using BIS XP TM, Covidien, Ireland

EV-1000 TM, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA

Intervention Type OTHER

Closed loop for fluid perfusion using EV-1000 TM, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BIS XP, Covidien, Ireland

Closed loop for propofol and remifentanil using BIS XP TM, Covidien, Ireland

Intervention Type OTHER

EV-1000 TM, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA

Closed loop for fluid perfusion using EV-1000 TM, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

bispectral index

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients scheduled for high risk vascular surgery
* Patients American Society Anesthesiologist classification: 3 or 4

Exclusion Criteria

* age less than 18 years,
* patients with arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation
* allergy to latex, propofol, remifentanil, morphine, muscle relaxant or any of the excipients,
* pregnant woman
* combined general and regional anesthesia,
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hopital Foch

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasme University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luc Barvais

Professor and head of the cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Clinics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luc Barvais, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Erasme University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasme University Hospital

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P2016/328

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Propofol vs Sevoflurane in Cardiac Surgery
NCT06729086 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA