NoL Monitor Performances of Nociceptive and Non-nociceptive Stimuli Discrimination During Robotic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04566536
Last Updated: 2023-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
83 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-10-07
2022-04-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Robotic surgeries have started to spread over the world 20 years ago, claiming to be mini-invasive with less hemorrhage complications, with better success based on the technical advantages of the robot allowing better access during anatomical challenges procedures. Robotic surgery has been suggested to decrease pain during surgery and post-operatively, because of the decreases abdominal wall constraints induced by the robotic arms compared to the surgeon arms.
This observational prospective non-interventional monocentric study intend to evaluate the performance of the NoL index to discriminate protocol-defined nociceptive from non nociceptive stimuli during robotic surgery.
All patients, scheduled for a robotic surgery procedure, will be orally informed about the study during the anesthesia consultation. During the procedure, the anesthesia procedure will be the same for all patients, as part of the usual care in our department. The NoL monitor will be added for the purpose of this study, but the results will be hidden from all physicians. All settings will be left the physician in charge. At the end of the surgical procedure, before transfer to the recovery room, data for the monitor will be extracted on a dedicated universal serial bus (USB) key. Files will be safely stored under RedCap before analysis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of NoL Index and ANI After Nociceptive Stimulation at Different Infusion Rates of Remifentanil Infusion
NCT02602379
Nociception Index Level (NOL) Perioperative Monitoring During Regional Anesthesia
NCT06300606
Impact of Nociception Level (NOL)-Guided Remifentanil Infusion on Intraoperative Arterial Pressure and Vasopressor Necessity
NCT04963036
Interest of the Study of Electroencephalogram and Peripheral Vegetative Markers for the Evaluation of Nociception Under General Anesthesia.
NCT03994887
Evaluating the Benefit of Hypnoanalgesia Versus Neuroleptanalgesia During Hand Surgery
NCT06185829
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Different monitoring devices, like the surgical pleth index, pupillometry or the "Analgesia Nociception Index", have been developed, based on several variables and algorithms, but none of them are still used in current practice. One of the major reason is that although they might had some effects on clinical parameters or drugs consumption, none of them had any influence on patient outcome. Recently developed, the nociception level (NoL) index (MEDASENSE BIOMETRICS Ltd®, Ramat Gan, Israel) is an index of nociception, based on a nonlinear algorithm combination of heart rate, heart rate variability, photoplethysmograph wave amplitude, skin conductance, skin conductance fluctuations, and their time derivatives. One of the first study to report the ability of the NoL index to discriminate noxious from non-noxious stimuli with high sensitivity and specificity was performed in 2016. In that randomized trial (continuous infusion of remifentanil target 2 versus 4 ng/ml) enrolling 58 patients undergoing a large range of surgery, the NoL index was superior than the hemodynamic parameters alone to characterize nociception. In a study enrolling 72 patients randomized within 6 remifentanil concentration targets undergoing several surgical procedures by the same authors, the NoL index was not affected by remifentanil doses, whereas it had an dose-dependent hemodynamic effect on HR and MAP.
Robotic surgeries have started to spread over the world 20 years ago, claiming to be mini-invasive with less hemorrhage complications, with better success based on the technical advantages of the robot allowing better access during anatomical challenges procedures. Debates recently arise based on the procedures cost and the little (or lack) of evidence of mini-invasive procedures in patients with cancers. Robotic surgery has been suggested to decrease pain during surgery and post-operatively, in gynecologic, thoracic, and general procedures although results are controversial, because of the decreases abdominal wall constraints induced by the robotic arms compared to the surgeon arms. To our knowledge, none of these studies evaluated pain based on a nociception monitoring device.
This observational prospective non-interventional monocentric study intend to evaluate the performance of the NoL index to discriminate nociceptive from non nociceptive stimuli during robotic surgery.
All patients, scheduled for a robotic surgery procedure, will be orally informed about the study during the anesthesia consultation. During the procedure, the anesthesia procedure will be the same for all patients, as part of the usual care in our department. Patients will be closely monitored by electrocardiogram, intermittent blood pressure by arm cuff, continuous pulse oximetry by finger probe, neuromuscular monitoring by train-of-four (TOF)-Cuff, bispectral index (BIS) monitoring using the BIS forehead 4-sensor. The NoL monitor will be added for the purpose of this study, but the results will be hidden. The probe will be placed on the hand contralateral to the blood pressure arm cuff. Anesthesia will be delivered by target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol by two separate infusion pumps. Once consciousness will be lost and a TOF calibration done, neuromuscular blockade will be performed by rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. All settings will be left the physician appreciation. Different stimuli (nociceptive and non-nociceptive) are defined according to protocol (such as intubation, incision, surgical haemostasia, urinary track catheter…) and their time of arrival will be collected in a Case Report Form. At the end of the surgical procedure, before transfer to the recovery room, data for the monitor will be extracted on a dedicated USB key. Files will be safely stored under RedCap before analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Surgery
Patients ≥ 18 years old scheduled for robotic surgery (all specialties except ENT)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for a robotic surgery in the center of investigation (all specialties except cardiac and ENT: gynaecologic, thoracic, urologic and abdominal)
* Non-opposition to the study participation
Exclusion Criteria
* Rapid sequence anaesthesia required
* Pregnancy and breast feeding
* Chronic medication by any pain killer (opioids or not)
* ENT and cardiac robotic surgery
* Neuromuscular disease
* NoL Index contre-indications, such as cardiac arrythmia, supra-clavicular arterial stenosis, severe hypovolemia, severe hypothermia
* Chronic alcoholism, toxicomania
* Severe obesity (IMC \> 35)
* Legal protection
* Opposition to the study participation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aurélie GOUEL-CHERON, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-A02744-53
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
APHP191091
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.