Evaluation of NoL Index and ANI After Nociceptive Stimulation at Different Infusion Rates of Remifentanil Infusion

NCT ID: NCT02602379

Last Updated: 2016-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Contrary to "immobility" and, to a lesser extent, to the "hypnosis/unconsciousness" component of general anaesthesia, the monitoring of "analgesia" remains largely elusive, evaluated mainly through poorly sensitive and potentially undesirable changes in patients' vital signs. This has led the industry to pursue the development of various devices and indices based on other physiological parameters such as heart rate variability (HRV), electroencephalogram (EEG), skin conductance, to name only a few. To the best of the knowledge, none of these parameters on its own has shown sufficient capacity in detecting different degrees of pain/analgesia balance to gain wide clinical use.

The purpose of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the response of a single-parameter index (the Analgesia Nociception Index \[ANI\]) and a multi-parameter index (the Nociception Level \[NoL\] Index) when patients under combined general anaesthesia/epidural anaesthesia for laparotomies are subjected to a standardized painful stimulus (a tetanic stimulation over the ulnar nerve at 70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds) at different doses of remifentanil infusion at steady state (0,005 mcg/kg/min; 0,05 mcg/kg/min; 0,1 mcg/kg/min; 0,15 mcg/kg/min). With the painful stimulus held constant but the analgesia provided gradually increased, it is expected to characterize the response of these two indices to different levels of nociception/anti-nociception balance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery by laparotomy (general surgery or gynaecological surgery) will receive a thoracic epidural (around T9-T10/T10-T11) and general anesthesia. Apart from standard monitoring, the ANI (derived from the EKG) and the NoL index (obtained via a finger probe) will be recorded. The epidural catheter will be injected with 6-10 ml of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 5 mcg/ml to produce anesthetic level of neuraxial blocade and then be perfused with the same solution at 4-8 ml/hour. After incision and confirmation of adequate blocade with the epidural local anesthetic, the patient will receive a series of painful electric stimulation with a standard nerve stimulator applied over the ulnar nerve in tetanic mode for 30 seconds at 100 Hz and 70mA. Each stimulation will occur at a different rate of infusion of IV remifentanil at steady state (0,005 mcg/kg/min; 0,05 mcg/kg/min; 0,1 mcg/kg/min; 0,15 mcg/kg/min). A stimulation at 0,005 mcg/kg/min will be done before and after epidural loading with local anesthetics to look for altered variations in analysed parameters. The variation and the kinetic of the variations after stimulations will be observed for heart rate, mean blood pressure, BIS, ANI and NoL index.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pain Monitoring Analgesia Nociception Index NoL Nociception Level Remifentanil

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tetanic stimulation

Single arm study. See Study description for a through description of the intervention.

Tetanic stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard Tetanic stimulation will be used as the stimulus to evaluate responses of the intraoperative pain indexes (ANI and NoL) at different concentration of i.v. remifentanil during anesthesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tetanic stimulation

Standard Tetanic stimulation will be used as the stimulus to evaluate responses of the intraoperative pain indexes (ANI and NoL) at different concentration of i.v. remifentanil during anesthesia.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA status I, II or III
* Elective abdominal surgery with median laparotomy under general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* Coronary artery disease
* Serious cardiac arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation)
* Patient refusal
* History of substance abuse
* Chronic use of psychotropic and/or opioid drugs
* Use of drugs that act on the autonomic nervous system (including β-blockers)
* History of psychiatric diseases or psychological problems
* Contraindications to epidural analgesia
* Allergy to remifentanil
* Unexpected difficult airway requesting excessive, possibly painful airway manipulations.
* Dural puncture during epidural catheter installation
* Failure of epidural analgesia
* Surgical unexpected complications requiring strong haemodynamic support (transfusions, vasopressors, inotropes)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medasense Biometrics Ltd

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe Richebé

MD, PhD, Professor of anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Richebé, M.D. PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HMR14090

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id