Influence of Anesthetics on Clinical Outcome in Mitral and Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults

NCT ID: NCT05696509

Last Updated: 2023-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-03

Study Completion Date

2022-10-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Abstract Anaesthetic support for cardiac surgery significantly influences the course of the intraoperative period and the success of the postoperative period. Total intravenous anaesthesia and inhalation anaesthesia are the traditional methods of anaesthesia in cardiac surgery. However, there are few studies assessing the effectiveness of surgical aggression protection in cardiac surgery.

Objectives: To study the effect of anesthetics on clinical outcome after mitral and aortic valve replacement in adults.

Methods. The data of 75 patients operated in the Cardiosurgery Department of the Medical Center Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan were included in the study. All patients underwent mitral, aortic valve replacement/plasty under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) conditions.

All patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of anaesthesia: the first (1) group patients anaesthetised with propofol (P), the second group with sevoflurane (S), and the last one is with isoflurane (I).

To maintain anaesthesia in Group 1 propofol was used as anaesthetic in a dose of 6 mg/kg/h intravenously on perfusion. In Group 2 the anaesthetic used was sevoflurane in a dose of 1.7-1.9 MAC. Group 3 used isoflurane in the dose of 1.1-1.2 MAC as anaesthetic. Statistical analysis was done by the method of single factor analysis of variance and Kruskal Wallis criterion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study includes data from 90 patients operated in the Cardiosurgery Department of the Medical Center Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan were included in the study. All patients underwent mitral, aortic valve replacement/plasty under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) conditions. This research work was conducted between 2020 and 2022. To calculate the sample size, the investigators used the formula n=t2\*D\*N/confidence interval\*N+t2\*α, which will allow to identify the static significance of the study.

All patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of anaesthesia: the first (1) group patients anaesthetised with propofol (P), the second group with sevoflurane (S), and the last one is with isoflurane (I).

The study was conducted in 5 stages:

1. Initial haemodynamic parameters and oxygen transport function of the patient's blood before anaesthesia were determined;
2. After tracheal intubation;
3. Before the CPB;
4. After the CPB;
5. The post-operative period until the patient is transferred to the specialized department.

Before induction into anaesthesia, haemodynamic monitoring was started on admission to the operating theatre using a Nihon Kohden monitor (Japan). The right radial artery was catheterised for invasive monitoring of systemic arterial pressure and arterial blood sampling, and a catheter was then inserted into the central jugular vein (under ultrasound machine control) and guided into the right atrium for mixed venous blood sampling.

Cardiac stroke volume was determined by transthoracic echocardiography (CS=end diastolic volume - end systolic volume). Cardiac output (CO=CS x heart rate), cardiac index (CI=CO/body surface area) were determined. the investigators determined blood oxygen content using the formula CaO2 (arterial ABB) and CvO2 (central mixed venous ABB) = \[(1.34 × Hb × SO2) + (PO2 × 0.031)\] / 100. Arteriovenous difference = CaO2-CvO2. Oxygen delivery was determined using the formula (DO2 = CI\* CaO2). Oxygen consumption (VO2 = Cardiac index (CI)\*AVD or VO2 = CO × (CaO2 - CvO2) \~ CO × Hb × 1.34 × (SaO2 - SvO2) / 100).

In the second stage, after tracheal intubation, indirect calorimetry was used to determine VO2, energy expenditure during anaesthesia using a Spirometry device (Oxford, UK), which was connected to an endotracheal tube and continuously showed oxygen demand and energy expenditure. A transesophageal echocardiography sensor was used to determine cardiac output. Additionally, the cardiac output was determined by Fick's formula. The same tests (cardiac output, cardiac index, consumption, oxygen delivery, energy expenditure) were performed in the third and fourth stages of anaesthesia. In the last stage, the consumption of muscle relaxants and opioid analgesics was calculated to assess the pharmaco-efficiency of anaesthetics. The time of extubation and the time of transfer of the patient to the specialized department were determined.

All patients continued antihypertensive medication both before and on the day of surgery to prevent the development of withdrawal syndrome and to reduce the risk of perioperative myocardial ischaemia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mitral Valve Insufficiency Aortic Valve Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propofol

Anesthetic

Group Type OTHER

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

To maintain anaesthesia in Group 1 P, propofol was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of 4-6 mg/kg/h intravenously on a perfusor.

Isofluran

Anesthetic

Group Type OTHER

Isoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

Isoflurane was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of - 1.1-1.2 MAC

Sevofluran

Anesthetic

Group Type OTHER

Sevoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

sevoflurane was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of - 1.7-1.9 MAC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol

To maintain anaesthesia in Group 1 P, propofol was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of 4-6 mg/kg/h intravenously on a perfusor.

Intervention Type DRUG

Isoflurane

Isoflurane was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of - 1.1-1.2 MAC

Intervention Type DRUG

Sevoflurane

sevoflurane was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of - 1.7-1.9 MAC

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Anesthesia Anesthesia Anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The age is between 40-60 years old;
* Mitral valve insufficiency grade 3-4;
* Aortic valve insufficiency grade 3-4;
* Participants of both sexes will be included in the study;
* Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy (risk to the baby and the mother)

* allergenic patients (anaphylactic shock).
* vulnerable groups.
* current congestive heart failure;
* current unstable angina pectoris;
* preoperative hemodynamic instability, defined as the use of vasopressors;
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astana Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bekzat Baiterek

2nd year doctoral student, anesthesiologist, resuscitator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alibek Kh Mustafin, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Astana Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bekzat

Astana, , Kazakhstan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Kazakhstan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AMU3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Propofol vs Sevoflurane in Cardiac Surgery
NCT06729086 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA