Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Continuous Paravertebral Infusion of Local Anesthetics Versus Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia on Acute and Chronic Neuropathic Pain After VATS Lobectomy

NCT ID: NCT01703351

Last Updated: 2019-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

79 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-04

Study Completion Date

2015-11-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Since mid-2000, thoracoscopic lobectomy has been replaced with conventional open lobectomy and it has reduced the operative morbidities and mortalities. However, thoracoscopic lobectomy also results in operative acute pain and the incidence of chronic pain after thoracoscopic lobectomy has been reported as up to 50%. Penetration of chest wall by trocar, torque at trocar and working window by operator, and compression of intercostal nerves have been suggested as a cause of pain after thoracoscopic lobectomy. The intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) that usually have used to control the operative pain, sometimes cause the side effects such as sedation, nausea and vomiting due to its systemic delivery of analgesics. Because of these side effects, IV PCA has to be discontinues and the effective dose of analgesics could not deliver to patients. In contrast to IV PCA, continuous paravertebral infusion of local anesthetics thorough catheter below the parietal pleura might reduce the side effects of IV PCA and control the operative pain effectively. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of continuous paravertebral infusion of local anesthetics thorough catheter below the parietal pleura for 60 hours after operation competed to IV PCA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Neoplasms Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Drug: 0.5% ropivacaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0.5% ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

(n=48); continuous paravertebral infusion of local anesthetics (0.5% ropivacaine, 5cc/hr for 60 hours after operation) thorough catheter below the parietal pleura using On-Q® system(I-flow corp, Lake Forest, CA, USA)

Fentanyl 500mcg + acupan 160mg + nasea 0.6mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fentanyl 500mcg + acupan 160mg + nasea 0.6mg

Intervention Type DRUG

(n=48); IV PCA (Fentanyl 500mcg + acupan 160mg + nasea 0.6mg, 5cc/hr for 60 hours after operation, 0.5cc bolus if patients feel breakthrough pain)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.5% ropivacaine

(n=48); continuous paravertebral infusion of local anesthetics (0.5% ropivacaine, 5cc/hr for 60 hours after operation) thorough catheter below the parietal pleura using On-Q® system(I-flow corp, Lake Forest, CA, USA)

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl 500mcg + acupan 160mg + nasea 0.6mg

(n=48); IV PCA (Fentanyl 500mcg + acupan 160mg + nasea 0.6mg, 5cc/hr for 60 hours after operation, 0.5cc bolus if patients feel breakthrough pain)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age; 18≥, \<75
* Thoracoscopic lobectomy due to lung cancer or suspected lung cancer
* Tolerable cardiopulmonary and other systemic function tolerable to lobectomy
* Karnofsky performance status ≥ 80
* Agree with study

Exclusion Criteria

* Intolerable to one-lung ventilation
* Bleeding risk due to Aspirin, coumadin and other drugs
* Past or current history of depression or other psychiatric disease
* Pain persisted before operation due to lung lesion
* History of rib fracture, trauma or lung surgery at the same side of operation
* Severe pleural adhesion or empyema
* Open thoracotomy conversion
* Reoperation due to postoperative bleeding or others
* Postoperative complications that need ICU care
* Chemical pleurodesis more than two times after operation
* Do not agree with study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

78 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2012-0470

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.