A Comparison of Two Treatments for CRPS and Changes in Resting-State Connectivity of Cerebral Networks.
NCT ID: NCT02753335
Last Updated: 2023-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combining fMRI and tDCS in Neuropathic Pain
NCT06237075
Structural and Functional Grey and White Matter Changes in Patients With Pain Disorders
NCT05679297
An Intervention Study of Anhedonia and Pain Empathy in Depression
NCT05355142
Spinal Cord Stimulation and Functional MRI
NCT01512121
Improving Dysregulated Neural Networks With EEG-neurofeedback
NCT06587919
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Brain mapping studies have provided increasing evidence that the central nervous system is playing an important role in the pathogenesis of CRPS. Reorganization of the somatosensory cortex and motor networks, with altered central processing of tactile and nociceptive stimuli as well as movement control has been demonstrated.
Functional brain imaging studies suggest that the volume of brain activation differs between motor execution and motor imagery, but the distribution of cerebral activity tends to be similar. Under imaginary movement of affected hands Gieteling et al. (2008) observed that there was reduced activation ipsilaterally in the premotor and adjacent prefrontal cortex, frontal operculum, anterior part of the insula cortex, and the superior temporal gyrus.
Stimulus-driven, functional magnetic resonance imaging, however, are time-consuming and prone to possible confounds, especially in clinical populations. In that perspective resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI), measuring the cerebral networks at rest (in absence of any task), is probably better suited to clinical examinations and is widely used to investigate brain networks that exhibit correlated fluctuations. During recent years, a large number of studies have indicated that RS-fMRI is sufficiently constrained by anatomy to allow the architecture of distinct brain systems to be characterized.
The default mode network (DMN) is probably the most studied resting state network. It seems to be involved in several processes and is found negatively modulated by chronic pain. Only one published study has investigated cerebral networks and cerebral connectivity in CRPS. Here the default mode network displayed reduced connectivity with the S1 compared to healthy controls. This indicates that decreased connectivity may be a key feature in cerebral functioning of CRPS patients. No study, however, has so far investigated if the reduced connectivity in the DMN is reversed in CRPS patients who experience pain reduction after GMI or desensitization treatment.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is another magnetic resonance technique useful for revealing microstructural properties of tissue, particularly in cerebral white matter.
Chronic pain has also been associated with reduced cognitive functioning. If this is caused by pain processing demands, competing with working memory and executive functions, the investigators would expect the cognitive capacity to be improved or restored if the pain is successfully treated.
Graded Motor Imagery: Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) is a rehabilitation process and has been used to treat chronic pain conditions and movement problems related to alterations in the nervous system such as CRPS, postamputation limb pain, and back pain. The patients are trained in monitored steps which increase in difficulty as progress is made. The three treatment components include left/right discrimination training, motor imagery exercises and mirror observations of the unaffected limb, appearing as the affected limb. The components are performed sequentially, but require a flexible approach to suit the individual patient. The imagined movements have been demonstrated to activate motor cortical areas similar to those activated in the actual execution of that movement.
Desensitization: Tactile desensitization (D) is used to decrease hyperalgesia and allodynia by repeatedly touching the affected area with various materials. This has successfully been used clinically in the treatment of CRPS.
Hypotheses: The following hypotheses will be investigated:
1. Patients, treated with GMI + D, experience a larger pain reduction compared with those subjected to D only.
2. Non-responders to D alone experience pain reduction when D is combined with GMI.
3. Patients with CRPS display reduced intra-network connectivity in the DMN compared to healthy controls.
4. Reduced intra-network connectivity in CRPS is associated with pain intensity.
5. Reduced connectivity in the DMN is reversed in patients who experience pain reduction after GMI and D treatment. This will be evident in the comparison of fMRI data obtained before and after treatment.
6. Microstructure of the cerebral white matter is changed during the intervention.
Design:The effects of treatment with Graded Motor Imagery (GMI ) and D versus D alone will be compared with an open, randomized, semi-cross-over case-control design.
The study patients will be allocated to either GMI+D or D alone. After an initial treatment period of six weeks responders (R) stay in the same treatment group and continue this treatment. Non-responders (NR) in the D treatment group will be offered an immediate combined treatment (GMI+D).
Randomization: The recruited patients will be allocated in a ratio 1:1 by randomization with a fixed block size of 6.
Analytical models: Self reported symptom burden and functional capacity will be compared between the two treatment groups and within each treatment group (i.e. comparisons before and after treatment and with each patient as his/her own control).
The investigators will also compare the two intervention groups (CRPS patients receiving a GMI+D and D alone) with a non-randomized comparison group of sex- and age-matched healthy persons.
Continuous, symmetrically distributed variables will be expressed by mean values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) constructed by the Student procedure. Proportions will be presented using the Binomial model with the exact 95% calculated confidence interval.
Assumed continuously distributed variables will be analyzed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model with the initial value as covariate while contingency table analysis is used for group comparisons of categorical and ranked variables.
The sample size calculation is based on distribution of the main variable, self-rated limb pain measured by Visual Analogue scaling (VAS). Based on the assumption of normality, a significance level of 5 % (α = 0.05), a power of (β = 0.80) and a clinical relevant difference of one time Standard Deviation (SD), 21 patients should be included in each of the two treatment groups. There will also be a sex- and age-matched comparison group of healthy persons (n:21).
Interventions:
Individually adjusted Graded motor imagery (GMI) and tactile desensitization (D).
Measurements:
MRI-scanning (for analyses of Intra-network connectivity in the DMN and DTI for microstructural changes in the white matter), Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and Neuropsychological tests are performed before the randomization and 12 months later.
Self reporting questionnaires will be performed at baseline, after the treatment period of six weeks, and at the 6 and 12 month follow up.
This includes demographic variables, and a comorbidity check list of diseases related to the major organ systems, pain intensity measured by numerical scales for pain intensity and by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), consumption of analgesics and the questionnaires: CRPS Severity Score, if upper limb affected; Quick DASH (a short form of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure), if lower limb affected; Lower extremity functional scale, Impact of Event Scale-6 if subjected to adverse life events, Insomnia Severity Index, The Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL- 25), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Perceived self efficacy and the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GMI and Desensitization
Left/right judgement, imagine movements of the affected area, mirror treatment and tactile stimulation of the affected limb with different materials.
GMI and Desensitization
Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) is used to treat chronic pain conditions and movement problems related to alterations in the nervous system such as CRPS, postamputation limb pain and back pain. The patient is trained in monitored steps. The three treatment components include left/right discrimination training, motor imagery exercises and mirror observations of the unaffected limb, appearing as the affected limb. They are performed sequentially, but require a flexible approach to suit the individual patient. The imagined movements have been demonstrated to activate motor cortical areas similar to those activated in the actual execution of that movement.
Desensitization (D) is used to decrease hyperalgesia by repeated tactile stimulation of the affected area with various materials.
Desensitization
Tactile stimulation of the affected limb with different materials.
Desensitization
Desensitization (D) is used to decrease hyperalgesia and allodynia by repeated tactile stimulation of the affected area with various materials.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GMI and Desensitization
Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) is used to treat chronic pain conditions and movement problems related to alterations in the nervous system such as CRPS, postamputation limb pain and back pain. The patient is trained in monitored steps. The three treatment components include left/right discrimination training, motor imagery exercises and mirror observations of the unaffected limb, appearing as the affected limb. They are performed sequentially, but require a flexible approach to suit the individual patient. The imagined movements have been demonstrated to activate motor cortical areas similar to those activated in the actual execution of that movement.
Desensitization (D) is used to decrease hyperalgesia by repeated tactile stimulation of the affected area with various materials.
Desensitization
Desensitization (D) is used to decrease hyperalgesia and allodynia by repeated tactile stimulation of the affected area with various materials.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CRPS affecting one single upper or lower limb diagnosed by the IASP (2012) Budapest research criteria (Harden et al., 2010).
* Triggering trauma or the onset of pain \>3 months ago.
* If possible drugs that can influence the fMRI scans should be avoided. Documentation if used.
Exclusion Criteria
* Malignant/progressive, systemic or neurodegenerative disease.
* Other severe pain conditions.
* Severe clinical anxiety or depression, symptoms of fatigue or ME of a disabling level.
For patients who participate in the MRI related analyses:
* Metallic implants incompatible with the MR technology or medical condition not recommended for fMRI.
* Pregnancy.
* Phobia for MRI examination.
* Diseases that can cause structural changes and interfere with the interpretation of the MRI-scans (like severe diabetes mellitus, heart disease, ischemic stroke and vascular conditions).
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital of North Norway
OTHER
University of Tromso
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gunnvald Kvarstein, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Tromso
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of North Norway
Tromsø, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Smart KM, Ferraro MC, Wand BM, O'Connell NE. Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 17;5(5):CD010853. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010853.pub3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014/1671(REK)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.