Cortical Plasticity After Motor Cortex Stimulation in Healthy Subject and Chronic Pain Patients
NCT ID: NCT02849834
Last Updated: 2025-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-11-30
2016-11-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In healthy subjects, cortical plasticity is evaluated by the comparison of somatosensory cortical maps before and after two isolated sessions of 20 Hz and theta-burst rTMS, in a cross-over randomized study.
Two sessions of 5 consecutive days of rTMS are proposed to the patients with a minimum of 4 weeks between the two sessions, defined by 20 Hz and theta-burst stimulation in a cross-over randomized order. Cortical plasticity of the motor cortex is evaluated via functional MRI (motor activation) performed before the first rTMS session and the last day of each session of rTMS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cortical Excitability Using Robotised and Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT02168413
Increasing Sensori-Motor Rhythm Activity by EEG-Neurofeedback to Reduce the Impact of Pain on Daily Functioning
NCT06234917
Pain Assessment and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tolerability in Patients With a Functional Neurological Disorder
NCT06149728
Effects of Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Cortical Excitability in Healthy Individuals
NCT07025759
Cortical Excitability Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Neuronavigation Device
NCT02596789
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
healthy volunteers
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
20Hz and Theta Burst stimulation, both at 80% of motor threshold in contralateral intrinsic hand muscles. Five consecutive days of each mode of stimulation, separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Daily self-monitoring of pain, sleep quality and fatigue by mans of a 10-item questionnaire
Patients with resistant pain
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
20Hz and Theta Burst stimulation, both at 80% of motor threshold in contralateral intrinsic hand muscles. Five consecutive days of each mode of stimulation, separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Daily self-monitoring of pain, sleep quality and fatigue by mans of a 10-item questionnaire
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
20Hz and Theta Burst stimulation, both at 80% of motor threshold in contralateral intrinsic hand muscles. Five consecutive days of each mode of stimulation, separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Daily self-monitoring of pain, sleep quality and fatigue by mans of a 10-item questionnaire
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients :
* aged from 18 to 80 years, male or female, with social protection , fully informed and having given their written consent.
* unilateral pharmacoresistant neuropathic pain during at least one year,
* without any change of the pharmacological treatment since at least one month
Exclusion Criteria
* history of chronic pain
* analgesic medication within 24h before stimulation
For patients only: new analgesic treatment within 1 month before consent
for both:
* drug addiction, headache, epilepsy history
* ferromagnetic intracranial device
* implanted stimulator
* absence of contraceptive method for women of childbearing age
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nathalie ANDRE-OBADIA, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Service d'Exploration, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Est, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, F-69495, France et NeuroPain lab - CRNL (Inserm U1028 - UCBL)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service d'Exploration, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Est, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, F-69495, France et NeuroPain lab - CRNL (Inserm U1028 - UCBL)
Bron, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andre-Obadia N, Hodaj H, Hodaj E, Simon E, Delon-Martin C, Garcia-Larrea L. Better Fields or Currents? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Transcranial Magnetic (rTMS) Versus Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Neuropathic Pain. Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jan;20(1):207-219. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01303-x. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-A01437-38
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2008-505
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.