Improving Bystander CPR Quality Through Dispatcher-assisted Basic Life Support Education Program
NCT ID: NCT02527473
Last Updated: 2015-08-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-30
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to determine whether the new DA-BLS program for possible home bystanders is associated with improved CPR quality. We expect home bystanders who were trained with new DA-BLS education program to show better compliance with CPR instructions given by dispatcher via telephone along with improved CPR quality.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program
NCT02142387
Implementation of Gold Standard EMS CPR Programs for 2% Improvement in Survival Rates of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in a Metropolitan City
NCT02540629
Dispatcher-Assisted CPR: Low-Dose, High-Frequency Simulation-Based Training
NCT04085692
Does Bystanders Emotional State Influence Dispatcher-assisted Cardiopulmonary?Resuscitation
NCT05113706
Evaluation of Efficacy of Online Real-time Home CPR Training Program
NCT05023616
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, bystander CPR rates have been reported to be low in many communities due to low access to CPR training. To address this, among many attempts to improve OHCA survival, enhancing bystander CPR rate and quality through dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR) to the right target group may be an effective and promising approach.
In DA-CPR, the dispatcher on the emergency line provides CPR instruction over the phone. Over-the-telephone CPR instruction was intended to primarily benefit bystanders who have little or no training, but studies have shown that it can also benefit trained bystanders who are in panic in emergency situations to prompt CPR administration. Trained bystanders who received dispatcher assistance during CPR also showed improved CPR quality.
Previous studies reported that 50-81% of OHCA occurs at home. However, the outcome in private homes was very poor compared to outside private home including public places. One possible reason of such lower survival rate may be that the current CPR education programs for home bystanders are inefficient in properly educating home bystanders to provide quality CPR to the patient. In other words, despite the reported benefits of DA-CPR in both trained and untrained bystanders, performing bystander CPR according to phone instruction provided by the dispatcher may not be easy to follow for certain home bystanders such as women and elderly.
According to a recent analysis of 2012 National OHCA Registry, outcomes after OHCA were significantly lower (adjusted odds ratio; 0.36, 95% confidence intervals; 0.18-0.71) in patients who received home bystander CPR with dispatcher assistance than in patients who received either public or who received home bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance. These results suggest that home bystander CPR with dispatcher assistance did not improve the outcomes due to low compliance of CPR instruction and low CPR performance quality by home bystanders. Considering that the in-home OHCA patients are less likely to receive bystander CPR, there needs a new approach to optimize the low compliance rate and CPR quality in possible home bystanders.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Education Group
Control group will receive standard basic life support training for one hour.
No interventions assigned to this group
HEROS Group
HEROS group will receive the dispatcher-assisted basic life support training that includes standardized video-based CPR education, interactive role-playing with the dispatcher as well as group discussion for one hour.
Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support CPR Education
The training program focuses on working in a team with a dispatcher, re-enacting all steps during an emergency call from recognition of cardiac arrest to performing CPR.
The one hour training session is split into four parts:
1. Video self-instruction manikin practice (30 min), including a brief introduction to AED.
2. Practice in pairs (15 min): Role-playing a simulated emergency scenario as the dispatcher and the rescuer
3. Debriefing (15 min): Questions, answers and reflection
4. Homework: Information leaflet handed out including at-home tasks such as operating the speakerphone function on the layperson's own phone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support CPR Education
The training program focuses on working in a team with a dispatcher, re-enacting all steps during an emergency call from recognition of cardiac arrest to performing CPR.
The one hour training session is split into four parts:
1. Video self-instruction manikin practice (30 min), including a brief introduction to AED.
2. Practice in pairs (15 min): Role-playing a simulated emergency scenario as the dispatcher and the rescuer
3. Debriefing (15 min): Questions, answers and reflection
4. Homework: Information leaflet handed out including at-home tasks such as operating the speakerphone function on the layperson's own phone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Elderly Seoul residents who are older than 65 years old
Exclusion Criteria
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sang Do Shin
Associate Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SNUH-EM-2014-2498
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.