The Effect of T-CPR on the Quality of CPR and AED Use

NCT ID: NCT03690102

Last Updated: 2021-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-08-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to examine the effect of telephone assistance and standardized basic life support courses on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of automated external defibrillator (AED).

The investigators hypothesize that bystanders can provide compressions in correct frequency and use an AED correctly as well as safely from telephone instructions but that correct and successful ventilations including correct open airway require training on a course.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study aims at answering the following research questions:

1. How is the quality of CPR and use of AED when performed by an inexperienced bystander who receives telephone assistance compared to the quality when performed by a trained bystander, who has passed a standardized European Resuscitation Council (ERC) course in basic life support (BLS) but does not receive telephone assistance?
2. How is the quality of CPR and use of AED when performed by a trained bystander who has passed a standardized ERC course in BLS and who receives telephone assistance compared to the quality when performed by a trained bystander who does not receive telephone assistance?

The questions are sought answered through simulated cardiac arrest scenarios in non-classroom settings.

Participants are recruited from ERC courses in BLS.

Participants are randomised to one of three groups (stratified for course type using computer-generated randomisation lists with blocks of variable sizes):

1. Cardiac arrest scenario test before BLS course with telephone-assistance.
2. Cardiac arrest scenario test after BLS course, no telephone-assistance.
3. Cardiac arrest scenario test after BLS course with telephone-assistance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Basic Cardiac Life Support Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel Assignment

Participants are randomized to one of three groups (stratified for course type, using computer-generated lists with variable block sizes):

Participants are given a cardiac arrest scenario test either before or after a European Resuscitation Council standardized basic life support course. Two of the groups receive instructions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from a dispatcher when they call the Emergency Medical Services.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No BLS course. With T-CPR.

The participant is presented for a cardiac arrest scenario before attending the ERC standardized BLS course.

During the scenario test, the participant will receive T-CPR.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

T-CPR

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants receive telephone instructions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) from the Emergency Medical Services in Copenhagen during the cardiac arrest scenario test.

With BLS course. No T-CPR.

The participant is presented for a cardiac arrest scenario after completion of the ERC standardized BLS course.

During the scenario test, the participant will not receive T-CPR.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ERC standardized BLS course

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive and complete the standardized course in basic life support (BLS) from European Resuscitation Council (ERC).

With BLS course. With T-CPR.

The participant is presented for a cardiac arrest scenario after completion of the ERC standardized BLS course.

During the scenario test, the participant will receive T-CPR.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

T-CPR

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants receive telephone instructions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) from the Emergency Medical Services in Copenhagen during the cardiac arrest scenario test.

ERC standardized BLS course

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive and complete the standardized course in basic life support (BLS) from European Resuscitation Council (ERC).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

T-CPR

Participants receive telephone instructions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) from the Emergency Medical Services in Copenhagen during the cardiac arrest scenario test.

Intervention Type OTHER

ERC standardized BLS course

Participants will receive and complete the standardized course in basic life support (BLS) from European Resuscitation Council (ERC).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participant at a European Resuscitation Council standardized basic life support course. Participants are enrolled from courses for university students, courses for elderly and courses for recruits in the Danish Emergency Management Agency.

Exclusion Criteria

* Basic life support course within the last two years.
* Healthcare professional or background as healthcare professional.
* Instructor in basic life support or first aid.
* Lifeguard or background as lifeguard.
* Does not want to participate.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TrygFonden, Denmark

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard

Researcher, medical student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Freddy Lippert

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark

Doris Oestergaard

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Student2Student

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAMES/AkutBeredskabet_2018_001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Automated Real-time Feedback on CPR Study
NCT00539539 COMPLETED PHASE2