CPR Quality and Use of Feedback for OHCA

NCT ID: NCT04152252

Last Updated: 2023-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2989 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation(CPR) delivered by EMS professionals and whether this quality can be improved by implementing real-time feedback during the event and an oral post-event debriefing procedure based on the actual event performance data.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether CPR quality can be improved by implementing real-time feedback and immediate oral structured post-event debriefing in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

The objectives of this study is to assess the current quality of CPR delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) during OHCA events in the Capital Region of Denmark. Furthermore, to investigate if CPR quality can be improved by applying real-time feedback during OHCA resuscitation attempts and to investigate if structured oral post-event debriefing delivered immediately after a resuscitation attempt and based on data from the defibrillator can further improve CPR quality

The hypothesis of this study is that adding real-time and post event feedback can improve the compression rate, compression depth, overall CPR hands-on time (CPR fraction), and recoil with at least 15% in total for both interventions.

Using a prospective study design data is retrieved from the standard defibrillator (ZOLL X series) through ZOLL RescueNet® Case Review (software for post-event review, analysis, and debriefing) from ZOLL Medical Corporation, Massachusetts, United States of America.

The study consists of three consecutive phases. Phase one with no feedback / debriefing available for EMS. Phase two with real-time feedback during the event and phase three which adds post-event debriefing to real-time feedback. We expect to be able to include at least 500 cases in each phase.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Baseline

No CPR feedback during CPR

No interventions assigned to this group

Real-time feedback

Real-time feedback on chest compression depth, chest compression rate and recoil available to EMS while performing CPR. Feedback is delivered as visual text, numeric and graphical presentations on the defibrillator with audio tones for rate.

Real time feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

Real-time feedback on chest compression depth, chest compression rate and recoil available to EMS while performing CPR. Feedback is delivered as visual text, numeric and graphical presentations on the defibrillator with audio tones for rate.

Post-event debriefing

Structured oral post-event debriefing based on objective performance data from the resuscitation attempt. The debriefing is conducted as hot/immediate self-directed debriefing session with a maximum length of 10 minutes.

Real time feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

Real-time feedback on chest compression depth, chest compression rate and recoil available to EMS while performing CPR. Feedback is delivered as visual text, numeric and graphical presentations on the defibrillator with audio tones for rate.

Post-event debriefing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Structured oral post-event debriefing based on objective performance data from the resuscitation attempt. The debriefing is conducted as hot/immediate self-directed debriefing session with a maximum length of 10 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Real time feedback

Real-time feedback on chest compression depth, chest compression rate and recoil available to EMS while performing CPR. Feedback is delivered as visual text, numeric and graphical presentations on the defibrillator with audio tones for rate.

Intervention Type OTHER

Post-event debriefing

Structured oral post-event debriefing based on objective performance data from the resuscitation attempt. The debriefing is conducted as hot/immediate self-directed debriefing session with a maximum length of 10 minutes.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

OHCA

Exclusion Criteria

No use of EMS defibrillator attached to patient during resuscitation attempt Patients \< 18 years of age OHCA without involvement of the physician manned vehicle Patients who are subject to mechanical CPR from the time of device attachment Traumatic OHCA
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TrygFonden, Denmark

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

St George's, University of London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kingston University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rasmus Meyer Lyngby

Paramedic (BSc.)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rasmus Lyngby, BSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Copenhagen EMS

Ballerup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lyngby RM, Quinn T, Oelrich RM, Nikoletou D, Gregers MCT, Kjolbye JS, Ersboll AK, Folke F. Association of Real-Time Feedback and Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation Quality Delivered by Ambulance Personnel for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e029457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029457. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37830329 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F-35103-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Automated Real-time Feedback on CPR Study
NCT00539539 COMPLETED PHASE2
Care After Resuscitation
NCT02275234 COMPLETED
The School Lifesavers Study
NCT03151785 COMPLETED NA