Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and AED Feedback

NCT ID: NCT00449969

Last Updated: 2011-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

312 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an online automatic feedback improved CPR quality (No-flow time, compression depth, short-term survival and one year follow up) in this prospective randomised study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1. Extended feedback

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Zoll AED pro

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arm one (Extended feedback) offers full feedback guidance during CPR

2. Limited feedback

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Zoll AED pro

Intervention Type DEVICE

In arm two (limited feedback) feedback is modified lacking several elements of feedback

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Zoll AED pro

Arm one (Extended feedback) offers full feedback guidance during CPR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Zoll AED pro

In arm two (limited feedback) feedback is modified lacking several elements of feedback

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* cardiac arrest

Exclusion Criteria

* age under 18 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Muenster

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas P Weber, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Muenster

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Muenster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lukas RP, Sengelhoff C, Dopker S, Harding U, Mertens P, Osada N, Van Aken H, Weber TP, Bohn A. [Chest compression quality : Can feedback technology help?]. Anaesthesist. 2010 Feb;59(2):135-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1671-4. German.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20151103 (View on PubMed)

Bohn A, Weber TP, Wecker S, Harding U, Osada N, Van Aken H, Lukas RP. The addition of voice prompts to audiovisual feedback and debriefing does not modify CPR quality or outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest--a prospective, randomized trial. Resuscitation. 2011 Mar;82(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21146279 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

02-AnIt-07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CPR Feedback Devices
NCT02293200 UNKNOWN NA
Evaluation of eCPR Survivors
NCT05339854 UNKNOWN