Effect of Capnography Feedback During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR ) on Patient's Outcome

NCT ID: NCT02045498

Last Updated: 2014-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-28

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare the quality performance of rescuers and resuscitation outcomes of cardiac arrest patients in both groups with and without capnography feedback

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study has done at Mashhad Ghaem Educational center. Two nurses and an anesthesia resident selected and trained according to the latest guidelines of CPR . In the control sample, with the declare of code 99 and attend the team on the patient's bedside, CPR begins and then every two minutes, return of the patient checks in the usual way. quality performance of rescuers ,Recovery or death of the patient and the result is recording. In the second phase , group members were educated how to use capnography (Comdek's MD-660P Oxi-Capnography) in CPR and guiding restoration efforts by it. with the code 99 and attend the team on the patient's bedside capnography uses and its waveforms will appear on the monitor device which is visible to all rescuers and the quality of performance is renewed based on the its guidance. The two groups patients for age, sex, initial rhythm of arrest, time of arrest until the first action, the time of arrest until the first shocks are comparing to control these factors influence on the outcome. quality performance of rescuers , resuscitation outcomes and CPR duration and relative factors in each of the groups were recorded and compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

capnography, feedback, quality of cpr

capnography feedback was used for management of the resuscitation and quality of cpr performance in rescuers and outcomes of the patients was measured.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

capnography feedback

Intervention Type DEVICE

capnography feedback was used for management of the resuscitation and quality of cpr performance in rescuers and outcomes of the patients was measured.

conventional cpr

conventional cpr

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

capnography feedback

capnography feedback was used for management of the resuscitation and quality of cpr performance in rescuers and outcomes of the patients was measured.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* cardiac arrest patient age more than 18

Exclusion Criteria

* age more than 80 cardiac arrest due to pulmonary embolism
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seyedreza Mazloum

dr seyed reza mazlom

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tayebe PourGhaznein, MSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

MUMS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghaem Educational, Research and Treatment Center

Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Iran

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iran

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Qvigstad E, Kramer-Johansen J, Tomte O, Skalhegg T, Sorensen O, Sunde K, Olasveengen TM. Clinical pilot study of different hand positions during manual chest compressions monitored with capnography. Resuscitation. 2013 Sep;84(9):1203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23499897 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/

In-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Catching up with Advances Made in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

capnography feedback

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Automated Real-time Feedback on CPR Study
NCT00539539 COMPLETED PHASE2
CPR Feedback Devices
NCT02293200 UNKNOWN NA
Evaluation of eCPR Survivors
NCT05339854 UNKNOWN
Improving Decisions About CPR
NCT03287895 COMPLETED NA