Optimal Training Frequency for Attainment and Maintenance of High-quality CPR on a High-fidelity Manikin
NCT ID: NCT02998307
Last Updated: 2018-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
244 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-30
2018-01-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Design: Randomized trial to compare the effect of different training frequencies on long-term CPR performance.
Participants and setting: Nurses in all adult departments at Health Sciences North. Subjects will be randomly assigned to a group that undertakes short CPR assessment and training sessions either 1) every month, 2) every 3 months, 3) every 6 months, or 4) every 12 months (control group) over the course of a twelve-month period.
Analysis: The proportion of nurses in each group that is able to perform "excellent CPR" at the twelve-month time point will be determined. Excellent CPR is defined as a two-minute CPR session where 90% of compressions are performed with correct depth (50-60 mm), 90% with correct rate (100-120 /min), and 90% with full chest recoil. A subgroup analysis will also be performed where the demographic data of individuals who are unable to perform excellent CPR at the twelve-month time point regardless of intervention group are compared against those who are successful.
Conclusion: The results of our study will help determine the longest CPR training interval associated with maintenance of high-quality CPR skills to minimize training sessions required and decrease associated costs. The results will also generate hypotheses for future study about optimizing role assignments and team performance in resuscitation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Three Different Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Training Methods
NCT01361919
Optimizing Integration of CPR Feedback Technology With CPR Coaching for Cardiac Arrest
NCT03204162
A Mannequin Study to Assess Various CPR Training Methods Using a Student Population
NCT01833910
Evaluation of Efficacy of Online Real-time Home CPR Training Program
NCT05023616
Continuous Chest Compressions vs AHA Standard CPR of 30:2
NCT01372748
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Monthly
Receive bedside CPR training monthly
CPR Training
Brief CPR assessment and training done during working hours with real-time performance feedback
3 months
Receive bedside CPR training every 3 months
CPR Training
Brief CPR assessment and training done during working hours with real-time performance feedback
6 months
Receive bedside CPR training every 6 months
CPR Training
Brief CPR assessment and training done during working hours with real-time performance feedback
Control
No additional training and only performance evaluation after 1 year
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPR Training
Brief CPR assessment and training done during working hours with real-time performance feedback
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Health Sciences North
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Health Sciences North
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.