Retention and Retrieval for Three Different Training Methods

NCT ID: NCT00933660

Last Updated: 2009-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

280 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The hypotheses that will be studied are:

H0: Providers trained by a web based application for skill competency in basic life support (BLS) and automated external defibrillation (AED) are as competent as those who were trained by certified instructors using the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) curriculum

H00-1: Providers who trained themselves with the used of web based training are more competent when they had a personal manikin for home exercise compared to providers who trained themselves with only a web based training

H0-2: Providers who did not receive any training will score lower than those who did.

Research questions for this study are:

1. What are the results in skill competency for non trained people?
2. What are the results in skill competency for trained people immediately after training?
3. What is the retention of skills for trained and non trained people after six months?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Improvement of BLS/AED Training Methods

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control-1

ERC-training by instructor

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ERC-training by instructor

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard way of training with an instructor

Control-2

No intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Experimental-1

Web-based training only

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Web-based training only

Intervention Type OTHER

Experimental way of training with a web based training application

Experimental-2

Web-based training with a personal training manikin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Web-based training with a personal training manikin

Intervention Type OTHER

Experimental way of training with a web based training application and a simple personal training manikin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ERC-training by instructor

Standard way of training with an instructor

Intervention Type OTHER

Web-based training only

Experimental way of training with a web based training application

Intervention Type OTHER

Web-based training with a personal training manikin

Experimental way of training with a web based training application and a simple personal training manikin

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* willing to follow a BLS/AED course

Exclusion Criteria

* CPR training within the last five years
* professional health care provider
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ambulance Oost

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Doczero

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Doczero

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wiebe de Vries, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Doczero

Koenraad Monsieurs, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital, Ghent

Joost Bierens, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

VU Medical Centre

Rudolph Koster, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Academical Medical Centre Amsterdam

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

081203_Ed-web

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CPR Feedback Devices
NCT02293200 UNKNOWN NA