Application of Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices and Their Value in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Analysis of the German Resuscitation Registry

NCT ID: NCT02932124

Last Updated: 2016-10-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

19609 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to analyse a large CPR database, the German Resuscitation Registry, to evaluate potential benefits of mechanical CPR devices over manual CPR in adult cardiac arrest victims. The primary endpoint considered is ROSC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In a retrospective analysis of the German Resuscitation Registry between 2007-2014, investigators examined the outcome after using mechanical CPR on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Investigators compared mechanical CPR (Intervention group) to manual CPR (control group). According to preclinical risk factors, investigators calculated the predicted ROSC-after-cardiac-arrest (RACA) score for each group, and compared it to the rate of ROSC observed. Using multivariate analysis, investigators adjusted the influence of the devices' application on ROSC for epidemiological factors and therapeutic measures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

manual chest compressions

No interventions assigned to this group

2

mechanical chest compression

mechanical chest compression device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mechanical chest compression device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* out of hospital cardiac arrest
* during time prod from January 2007 until December 2014
* CPR attempted

Exclusion Criteria

* Investigators excluded cases in which CPR was continued for less than five minutes, or duration of CPR was missing, as the outcome in this early period is not affected by the CPR mode.
* Children aged less than 18 years and patients of unknown age were also excluded as the devices are not approved for resuscitation on children.
* An active compression-decompression (ACD) is a hand-held suction device, to compress and actively decompress the chest after each compression.
* Investigators also excluded cases where ACD CPR was used, because it constitutes a different technology.
* Cases due to trauma were excluded as application of mechanical CPR devices may be limited due in traumatic events.
* Cases where data on ROSC and/or CPR mode was missing were also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

German Resuscitation Registry

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jan-Thorsten Graesner, MD

PD Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Wnent, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

German Resuscitation Registry

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GRR-CC07-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CPR Feedback Devices
NCT02293200 UNKNOWN NA