Effectiveness of Pediatric Resuscitation

NCT ID: NCT02283034

Last Updated: 2014-11-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to compare five CPR feedback devices to standard BLS in terms of the quality of single rescuer pediatric resuscitation. Therefore, the investigators hypothesis was that there would be no difference between CPR methods in terms of chest compression quality parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death worldwide. High-quality chest compressions are of paramount importance for survival and good neurological outcome. Unfortunately, even health professionals have difficulty performing effective CPR. Chest compression (CC) is often too shallow, compression ratio is inadequate, and hands-off time is too long. CPR feedback devices might be an option for rescuers to in order to increase CC efficiency.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

With feedback

Participants compress the chest of the manikin with CPR feedback device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard BLS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Chest compressions without CPR feedback device (manual resuscitation)

Without feedback

Participants compress the chest of the manikin without CPR feedback device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The CPRmeter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Feedback device - 1

The PocketCPR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Feedback device - 2

Standard BLS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard basic life support = chest compressions without any feedback device (manual resuscitation)

The CPREazy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Feedback device - 3

The CPR PRO APP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Feedback device - 4

The CardioPump

Intervention Type DEVICE

Feedback devices - 5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The CPRmeter

Feedback device - 1

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PocketCPR

Feedback device - 2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard BLS

Standard basic life support = chest compressions without any feedback device (manual resuscitation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The CPREazy

Feedback device - 3

Intervention Type DEVICE

The CPR PRO APP

Feedback device - 4

Intervention Type DEVICE

The CardioPump

Feedback devices - 5

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard BLS

Chest compressions without CPR feedback device (manual resuscitation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* give voluntary consent to participate in the study
* medical profession (paramedics, nurses, physicians) or medical students (nurses, paramedics, physicians)

Exclusion Criteria

* not meet the above criteria
* wrist or low back diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lukasz Szarpak

Lukasz Szarpak

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrzej Kurowski

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Cardiology

Lukasz Szarpak

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Cardiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lukasz Szarpak

Role: CONTACT

+48500186225

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lukasz Szarpak

Role: primary

+48500186225

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CPR/2014/06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CPR Feedback Devices
NCT02293200 UNKNOWN NA
The School Lifesavers Study
NCT03151785 COMPLETED NA