Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single-rescuer Pediatric Resuscitation
NCT02694900
Ambulance Crews' Experiences of Using a Mechanical Chest Compression Device.
NCT04478786
Hand vs. Foot Chest Compressions in Simulation
NCT07074080
Pediatric Resuscitation With Feedback Devices
NCT02294721
Automated Chest Compression in Cardiac Arrest
NCT00641069
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation
standard CPR (30:2) according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Manual chest compressions
2 min of Chest compressions without mechanical chest compression system
ARM chest compressions
2 min of Chest compressions with mechanical chest compression system LifeLine ARM
asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation
asynchronuos CPR according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Manual chest compressions
2 min of Chest compressions without mechanical chest compression system
ARM chest compressions
2 min of Chest compressions with mechanical chest compression system LifeLine ARM
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Manual chest compressions
2 min of Chest compressions without mechanical chest compression system
ARM chest compressions
2 min of Chest compressions with mechanical chest compression system LifeLine ARM
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* maximum 1 year of work experience in medicine
* minimum 10 clinical resuscitations
* paramedics
Exclusion Criteria
* wrist or low back diseases
* pregnancy
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Warsaw
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Łukasz Szarpak
Łukasz Szarpak
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Łukasz Szarpak
Warsaw, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Truszewski Z, Szarpak L, Kurowski A, Evrin T, Zasko P, Bogdanski L, Czyzewski L. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
Kurowski A, Czyzewski L, Bogdanski L, Zasko P, Karczewska K, Szarpak L. Quality of chest compression with CardioPump CPR compared to single rescuer standard BLS. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;33(1):114-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Oct 20. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
02.008.1MR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.