The Haemodynamic Effects of Mechanical Standard and Active Chest Compression-decompression During Out-of-hospital CPR
NCT ID: NCT02479152
Last Updated: 2017-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
126 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2017-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of Conventional Adult Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Against a Concept With Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation - LINC Study
NCT00609778
Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression
NCT04069377
Application of Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices and Their Value in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Analysis of the German Resuscitation Registry
NCT02932124
Pediatric Resuscitation With Feedback CPR Devices
NCT02281903
Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT04422938
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LUCAS 2 AD
LUCAS 2 AD will be used for CPR
LUCAS2 AD
LUCAS™ 2AD with compressions like the standard LUCAS™ 2 but added decompressions above the initial start position.
LUCAS2
LUCAS2 will be used for CPR
LUCAS2 AD
LUCAS™ 2AD with compressions like the standard LUCAS™ 2 but added decompressions above the initial start position.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LUCAS2 AD
LUCAS™ 2AD with compressions like the standard LUCAS™ 2 but added decompressions above the initial start position.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients 18 years or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Age believed to be less than 18 years
* Known pregnancy
* Victim not to be resuscitated (DNR orders)
* Internals in prison
* Included once in the study already
* To Small/Large patients
* Sustained ROSC occurring before the LUCAS™ 2 or LUCAS™ 2-AD can be applied to the patient, such that further CPR is not needed
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GE Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Physio-Control
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lars Wik
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Wik, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oslo Universitetssykehus. Ullevål, Norway.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oslo University hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berve PO, Hardig BM, Skalhegg T, Kongsgaard H, Kramer-Johansen J, Wik L. Mechanical active compression-decompression versus standard mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised haemodynamic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study. Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Protocol ID 11, March 2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.