Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
214 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-01-01
2018-04-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT04422938
Manual and Mechanical Chest Compression During In-hospital Witnessed Cardiac Arrests Using Cerebral Oximetry
NCT03238287
The Haemodynamic Effects of Mechanical Standard and Active Chest Compression-decompression During Out-of-hospital CPR
NCT02479152
A Comparison of Conventional Adult Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Against a Concept With Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation - LINC Study
NCT00609778
Chest Compression and Cerebral Oxygenation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT03062306
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Manuel chest compression
Manuel chest compressions will be handled by human efforts.
Manuel chest compressions by human efforts
In this way chest compressions will be handled by humans themselves.
Mechanical chest compression
In the study, chest compression in the mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation group was performed with the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Chest Compression System (LUCAS 2).
LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System
LUCAS is a portable device designed to rule out the problems encountered during manual chest compression, capable of performing standard and continuous chest compressions at a depth of 4-5 cm and at least 100 times per minute.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System
LUCAS is a portable device designed to rule out the problems encountered during manual chest compression, capable of performing standard and continuous chest compressions at a depth of 4-5 cm and at least 100 times per minute.
Manuel chest compressions by human efforts
In this way chest compressions will be handled by humans themselves.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alp Şener
Clinical Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brodal Syversen K, Souvannasacd E, Renger R. Validating the LUCAS(R) mechanical chest compression fit specifications. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;37(2):371-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.06.069. Epub 2018 Jun 30. No abstract available.
Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DV, Verheugt FW, Smeets JL, de Boer MJ. Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;67(3):349-360.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
Gates S, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Blair L, Couper K, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 Sep;94:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
medybu154
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.