Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Quality Study (CILICA-QS)
NCT ID: NCT03140202
Last Updated: 2017-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-18
2017-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study design: simulated prospective monocentric randomized crossover trial.
Participants and methods: Sixty five professionals rescuers of the pre-hospital care unit of University Hospital of Caen (doctors, nurses and ambulance drivers) are enrolled to performed continuous chest compression on manikin (ResusciAnne®, Laerdal), twice, with and without a feedback device (CPRmeter®). Correct compression score (the main criterion) is defined by reached target of rate, depth and leaning at the same time (recorded continuously).
Hypothesis: Feedback device preserve chest compression quality above the 2 minutes recommended switch over during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Human Study (CILICA-HS).
NCT03817892
Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Fatigue Study
NCT02322359
How to Learn Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT04039997
Assessing CPR Quality During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
NCT00228293
Comparison of the Quality of CPR by Lay Rescuers With and Without Feedback Devices
NCT02000505
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
In Blind group, participants have a real time record of chest compression quality performed by means of the feedback device without feedback information of the performance.
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Guide then blind
This group use the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen visible) first, then have no access to the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen mask).
CPRmeter (feedback device) with feedback
Participants have a real time feedback and record.
CPRmeter (feedback device) without feedback
Participants have a real time record without feedback.
Blind then guide
This group have no access to the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen mask) first then use the CPRmeter visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (screen visible).
CPRmeter (feedback device) with feedback
Participants have a real time feedback and record.
CPRmeter (feedback device) without feedback
Participants have a real time record without feedback.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPRmeter (feedback device) with feedback
Participants have a real time feedback and record.
CPRmeter (feedback device) without feedback
Participants have a real time record without feedback.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability in CardioPulmonary Resuscitation
Exclusion Criteria
* refusal
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clement BULEON, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Simulation Center Normandie Simulation en Sante
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Caen
Caen, Normandy, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A16-D51-VOL.30
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.