Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
21 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-03-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
During resuscitation, damage is mitigated if chest compressions and other medical care are optimal, allowing some blood to reach the brain and some oxygen to reach the cells. Once the heart starts beating again, which is called return of spontaneous circulation, brain perfusion is reestablished, but usually not to normal. The now damaged brain is very fragile, can be sensitive to any changes in blood pressure or metabolic abnormalities, and swelling might set in. Hypoperfusion can persist, without the clinician's knowledge. All of these events further damage the brain and diminish the odds that the patient will regain a normal life. Therefore, the hours following return to spontaneous circulation are critical to the patient's future recovery, and constitute a window of opportunity to maximize the brain ability to heal.
In order to optimize resuscitative efforts and post-arrest management, clinicians must know what is actually happening with the most vital organ, the brain. The problem is that it is very difficult to do in a comatose patient. The available technologies only reveal indirect evidence of brain suffering, like the swelling on CT-scans, but not to continuously evaluate at the bedside if the brain actually receives enough blood.
The FDA recently approved a device named the c-flow, made by ORNIM. This device looks at red blood cells in the brain and the speed at which they move to evaluate an index of cerebral perfusion. It does so with sensors put on the patient's forehead, which emit and detect ultrasounds and infrared light. This index can inform the clinician about the amount of blood flow the brain receives, and it can be put in place very quickly, even during resuscitative efforts, and without any danger for the patient.
The study looks at how well the information obtained with the c-flow matches the one obtained from other indirect indices and, more importantly, how well it predicts patient outcome. The investigators wish to establish threshold values of this index of perfusion that predict a good recovery so that this information may be used to optimize patient's neurological outcome in the near future.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cerebral Oximetry and NIRS in Cardiac Arrest Patients
NCT03769740
Cerebral Oxygenation in Cardiac Arrest and Hypothermia
NCT01531426
Non-invasive Neurological Evaluation During CPR
NCT02684955
Delineating Between Pathophysiologic Phenotypes of Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest
NCT05390060
Characterizing the cerebrovAscular Physiology of Optimal Mean Arterial Pressure Targeted Resuscitation
NCT03609333
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is undergoing a major paradigm shift, with new emphasis on optimizing neurological recovery. As a result, Cardio-Cerebral Resuscitation (CCR) is now the preferred term for describing protocols directed at promoting survival and recovery from cardiac arrest. Establishing and maintaining brain perfusion is the critical endpoint of resuscitation; however, there is currently no simple and reliable way to evaluate the adequacy of brain tissue perfusion in cardiac arrest patients. The overall goal of the NINCA study is to determine if non-invasive cerebral blood flow index (CFI) can be used as a simple and effective measurement of brain perfusion during and after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Our researchers hypothesize that this monitoring may one day be routinely used to (1) evaluate the adequacy of chest compressions, (2) avoid brain tissue hypoperfusion induced by excessive hyperventilation or shivering, (3) serve as an endpoint for goal-directed hemodynamic support, (4) evaluate the potential for neurological recovery, and (5) help guide post-cardiac arrest care.
Implications for Further Research:
Successful completion of the research will hopefully establish that non- invasive cerebral blood flow monitoring is feasible during and after CPR; is dependent on adequate MAP, CO, temperature, SpO2 and ventilation; and is a valid predictor of neurological recovery. If confirmed, such monitors may one day become part of standard ICU post-cardiac arrest monitoring and even be part of standard resuscitation equipment.
Determination of optimal CFI thresholds or targets will support future studies to determine if "goal directed" and individualized post-resuscitation ICU care is feasible using non-invasive cerebral perfusion indices. This could lead to a new way of optimizing hemodynamic support, temperature management and ventilation strategies to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion and improve neurological outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cardiac arrest
Consecutive adult cardiac arrest patients with sustained ROSC in an academic medical center
Non-invasive cerebral flow monitoring
As soon as possible after ROSC, c-flow monitor will be connected to the patient, recording cerebral flow index for the first 72 hours following ROSC. All other relevant clinical data will be recorded.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-invasive cerebral flow monitoring
As soon as possible after ROSC, c-flow monitor will be connected to the patient, recording cerebral flow index for the first 72 hours following ROSC. All other relevant clinical data will be recorded.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sustained ROSC within 60 minutes of arrest
* Patient is comatose (unresponsive and unable to follow verbal commands) after resuscitation
Exclusion Criteria
* Acute traumatic brain injury, SAH, massive stroke or intracranial hemorrhage
* Initiation of monitoring is not feasible for logistical reasons
* Urgent surgery planned
* Severe co-morbidity or terminal illness which makes survival to 3 months unlikely
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephan A Mayer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Neurology Department, Mount Sinai Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Francoeur CL, Lee J, Dangayach N, Gidwani U, Mayer SA. Non-invasive cerebral perfusion monitoring in cardiac arrest patients: a prospective cohort study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105970. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105970. Epub 2020 May 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GCO 15-1105
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.