ACCESS to the Cardiac Cath Lab in Patients Without STEMI Resuscitated From Out-of-hospital VT/VF Cardiac Arrest

NCT ID: NCT03119571

Last Updated: 2021-01-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-12

Study Completion Date

2019-11-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine if survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome for adults ages 18-75 who are resuscitated from out-of-hospital VT/VF cardiac arrest without clinical signs of a heart attack do better by going straight to the cardiac catheterization laboratory or admitted to the intensive care unit for evaluation. The investigators think a large portion of resuscitated patients presenting with VT/VF have ischemic heart disease which is the cause for the arrest. And prompt access to the cardiac catheterization laboratory to reverse the blocked artery will improve survival with good neurological outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Aim

Determine survival to hospital discharge with Modified Rankin Scale Score (mRS) ≤ 3 in adult (18-75 years old) patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital VT/VF cardiac arrest who do not have ST-segment elevation on emergency department 12-lead ECG (no-STEMI) randomized to receive either: 1) initial CCL admission, or 2) initial ICU admission.

Hypothesis: The corresponding hypothesis is that a large proportion of all resuscitated patients presenting with VT/VF have ischemic heart disease as the underlying cause for the participants cardiac arrest and that a strategy to facilitate prompt revascularization in all patients presenting with VT/VF who do not have ST-segment elevation on emergency department 12-lead ECG will improve survival with good neurological outcome.

Primary Endpoint

Survival to hospital discharge with mRS ≤ 3

Secondary Aims

Determine secondary assessments of survival, left ventricular function, hospital duration, and rehabilitation in-hospital and assessment of survival and functional status at 3 months in both groups.

Hypothesis: The corresponding hypothesis is that initial CCL admission will result in improved secondary assessment values at 3 months.

Secondary Endpoints

In-hospital secondary endpoints: Survival to hospital discharge, CPC score, mean peak troponin level, mean ejection fraction, mean length of ICU stay, mean hospitalization duration, the incidence of and mean length of rehabilitation.

3-month post-hospital discharge secondary endpoint: Survival to 3 months, survival to 3 months with mRS ≤ 3, functional status at 3 months (CPC score), incidence and length of rehabilitation, incidence of congestive heart failure, incidence of re-hospitalization over 3 months, and incidence and time to return to work.

Pragmatic Clinical Trial

The ACCESS Trial will randomize patients to receive one of two standard treatments currently practiced in the United States: either, 1) initial CCL admission, or 2) initial ICU admission. Other than randomizing to one of these two standard treatments, care is not otherwise specified and is completely at the discretion of the treating clinician, including coronary interventions, if any, hemodynamic support, medications, therapeutic hypothermia, and all other interventions and clinical care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Arrest Due to Underlying Cardiac Condition Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiopulmonary Arrest With Successful Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Initial CCL admission

Admission to the CCL to evaluate the coronary artery disease

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Initial CCL admission

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Admission to the cardiac catheterization lab to evaluated coronary artery disease and if present fix the culprit lesion/lesions

Initial ICU admission

Admission to the ICU to be evaluated by clinical team and the clinical treatment will be decided by the admitting/attending team.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Initial ICU admission

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Evaluate for additional testing and/or procedures

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Initial CCL admission

Admission to the cardiac catheterization lab to evaluated coronary artery disease and if present fix the culprit lesion/lesions

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Initial ICU admission

Evaluate for additional testing and/or procedures

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult presumed or known to be 18-75 years old
* Resuscitated from OOHCA
* Initial cardiac arrest rhythm of pulseless VT/VF (including patients treated with an AED)
* No ST-segment elevation MI (No STEMI) (or STEMI-equivalent syndrome) on ED 12-lead ECG (as interpreted by a physician)

Exclusion Criteria

* Initial non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rhythm (pulseless electrical activity or asystole)
* Valid do not resuscitate orders (DNR),
* Blunt, penetrating, or burn-related injury, drowning, electrocution or known overdose,
* Known prisoners
* Known pregnancy,
* ST-segment elevation on ED 12-lead ECG (as interpreted by a physician)
* Absolute contraindications to emergent coronary angiography including,
* known anaphylactic reaction to angiographic contrast media,
* active gastrointestinal or internal bleeding, or
* severe concomitant illness that drastically shortens life expectancy or increases risk of the procedure.
* Suspected or confirmed intracranial bleeding
* Refractory cardiac arrest (prior to randomization)
* Patients meeting ACCESS Trial eligibility criteria initially seen in an outside hospital and then transferred to an ACCESS Trial participating hospital
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Demetris Yannopoulos, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota

Tom Aufderheide, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MCW

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Grady Memorial Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph Mercy Hospital

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

North Memorial Medical Center

Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Fairview Southdale Hospital

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hennepin County Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hospital

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Regions Hospital

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Hospital

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Miriam Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Parkland Memorial Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin Froedtert Hospital

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Main Consent

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Continued Participation Consent

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CV-2017-25768

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Automated Real-time Feedback on CPR Study
NCT00539539 COMPLETED PHASE2