MedDataX Logo

Compare Outcomes of CPR Between the Video-laryngoscopy (VL) Users and the Direct-laryngoscopy (DL) Users

NCT ID: NCT03256019

Last Updated: 2017-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-01

Study Completion Date

2016-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a clinical study based on the analysis of video-clip data of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and clinical data for out of hospital cardiac arrest patients between 2011 and 2015. Aim of study is to compare the endotracheal intubation performance and CPR outcomes between videolaryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) users.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) has been considered to be the best method of airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However ETI during CPR is a highly skill-dependent procedure, then it should be attempted only highly trained physicians. Because of technical difficulty in using direct laryngoscopy (DL), various types of videolaryngoscopy (VL) devices using micro-camera technology have been designed to overcome the problems of DL.

This study tried to compare the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival discharge between use of standard device (DL) and VL in a real clinical setting. In addition, this study also compare the first pass success rate of ETI,speed of ETI, incidences of complications, and chest compression interruptions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation between both device users.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

intubation Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DL user

Experienced emergency physicians who primarily used the direct laryngoscopy (DL) for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endotracheal Intubation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Insertion of endotracheal tube into the trachea and supply oxygen using the Ambu-bagging during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

VL user

Experienced emergency physicians who primarily used the videolaryngoscopy (VL) for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endotracheal Intubation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Insertion of endotracheal tube into the trachea and supply oxygen using the Ambu-bagging during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endotracheal Intubation

Insertion of endotracheal tube into the trachea and supply oxygen using the Ambu-bagging during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who suffer sudden out-of hospital cardiac arrest

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiac arrests from multiple trauma
* Cases of requesting the do-not attempt resuscitation before ETI
* Intubated cases before arrival to emergency department
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Konkuk University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sang O, Park

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sang O Park, M.D,Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University Medical center

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Soar J, Nolan JP, Bottiger BW, Perkins GD, Lott C, Carli P, Pellis T, Sandroni C, Skrifvars MB, Smith GB, Sunde K, Deakin CD; Adult advanced life support section Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:100-47. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.016. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26477701 (View on PubMed)

Hasegawa K, Hiraide A, Chang Y, Brown DF. Association of prehospital advanced airway management with neurologic outcome and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2013 Jan 16;309(3):257-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.187612.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23321764 (View on PubMed)

Wang HE, Simeone SJ, Weaver MD, Callaway CW. Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):645-652.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.024. Epub 2009 Jul 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19573949 (View on PubMed)

Kaplan MB, Ward DS, Berci G. A new video laryngoscope-an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Dec;14(8):620-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00457-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12565125 (View on PubMed)

Rothfield KP, Russo SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? a pro-con debate. J Clin Anesth. 2012 Nov;24(7):593-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23101777 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CPRIntuVLvsDL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id