Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
112 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-13
2025-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
During the many sessions previously carried out by our team, it often appeared that students, when evaluating breathing forget the 1st part related to airway and breathing, i.e. relieving airway obstruction. Yet it has been shown that opening the airway and early removal of a foreign body are associated with improved neurological survival. Importantly, mouth-to-mouth is not included in the learning session and compression-only is advocated.
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate if the use of an observation tool, with items centered on airway obstruction, can improve learning of this step, as shown in some previous trials.
This will be a trial performed in medical students in which training days will be randomized to include or not the use of an observation tool modified to emphasize the procedural parts that are aimed at relieving airway obstruction.
At the end of each day, students will be video-recorded while playing a short BLS scenario and airway obstruction-relieving skills will be compared.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of an Observer Tool to Improve Learning Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest Management
NCT05187299
Retention and Retrieval for Three Different Training Methods
NCT00933660
Mastery Learning Versus Time-based Education: Skill Acquisition and Retention of Basic Life Support in Laypeople
NCT02059395
Clinical Audit of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation Management in Adults Patient Units of Care by in Situ Simulation
NCT02065934
Group Size in Basic Life Support (BLS) Courses
NCT03773861
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During the many sessions previously carried out by our team, it often appeared that students, when evaluating breathing forget the 1st part related to airway and breathing, i.e. relieving airway obstruction. Yet it has been shown that opening the airway and early removal of a foreign body is associated with improved neurological survival. Importantly, mouth-to-mouth is not included in the learning session and compression-only is advocated.
The purpose of the present is to evaluate if the use of an observation tool, with items centered on airway obstruction, can improve learning of this step, as shown in some previous trials. In a previous trial indeed, the use of an observation tool improved airway management during simulated BLS but this was a secondary outcome and the validity of this result could not be ensured. To increase the positive effects of training when the learner is in the role of observer, some authors have proposed to strengthen the educational effect through the use of an observer tool that observers must complete by analyzing the progress of the task performed by their colleagues. This is a list describing a set of key points to be achieved. However, data concerning the educational value of these observer tools are limited. Studies on the use of these tools during crisis management training in the operating room assessed by high-fidelity simulation have shown improved learning outcomes although some other trials have provided negative results.
This will be a trial performed in medical students in which training days will be randomized to include or not the use of an observation tool modified to emphasize the procedural parts that are aimed at relieving airway obstruction.
This prospective and randomized study will be performed in an academic simulation center during a 8-hour basic emergency skills training in which life support during cardiac arrest lasts nearly 5 hours. Each of the 5 steps is taught incrementally and cumulatively (i.e. when an addition a step is taught, the next practical exercise starts from the 1st step and includes the new one), to familiarize students with technical skills and progression of care and to favor reflexivity by repetitively performing the task. For each step, the trainer initially evaluates the baseline knowledge of students, then provides theoretical information and finally all students perform the cumulative steps in dyads while being observed by the other trainees. The dyad strategy has been previously used and has been chosen to facilitate understanding of task distribution (call for help, lifting the chin during massage, defibrillator search and placement…) and improve training on how to change the rescuer performing the cardiac massage when fatigue arises.
Training days will be randomized according to the following design when learners will perform BLS:
* OT+ group: the observers will use an observer tool (based on technical skills and specifically highlighting actions related to airway management) when they will be not role role-playing. The OT will be provided to learners at the start of the session with a short briefing to explain how to use it. Sheets will be collected at the end of the session.
* OT- group: no observer tool will be used and observers will be encouraged to look at the performance of their peers.
The observer tool used will be based on the 2021 European Resuscitation Council Guidelines (amended when necessary with the 2023 ILCOR recommendations). The observer tool is made of 20 items but has been modified from a previous version to highlight the importance of airway obstruction by increasing the number of items related to airway management.
At the end of each day, students still working in randomly distributed dyads will be video-recorded while playing a short BLS scenario and airway relieving skills will be compared. Medical students will be enrolled after having given their written consent and video copyright. All scenarios will be recorded and anonymously retained and analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
observer tool +
use an observer tool
use of an observer tool when not role-playing
Observers will use an observer tool (based on technical skills and specifically related to airway management during BLS) when they will be not role role-playing.
observer tool -
In this group, the students will not be given the observer tool and will observe other residents without any additional form.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
use of an observer tool when not role-playing
Observers will use an observer tool (based on technical skills and specifically related to airway management during BLS) when they will be not role role-playing.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* no video-recording during simulation (i.e. technical problem)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Université Paris-Sud
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dan Benhamou
Study Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Antonia BLANIE, MD, PhD
Role: CONTACT
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Goulamhoussen A, Havard C, Gille B, Francois B, Benhamou D, Blanie A. An observer tool to enhance learning of medical students during simulation training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05658-x.
Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, Monsieurs KG, Raffay V, Smyth M, Soar J, Svavarsdottir H, Perkins GD. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support. Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:98-114. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Couper K, Abu Hassan A, Ohri V, Patterson E, Tang HT, Bingham R, Olasveengen T, Perkins GD; International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic and Paediatric Life Support Task Force Collaborators. Removal of foreign body airway obstruction: A systematic review of interventions. Resuscitation. 2020 Nov;156:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LabForSIMS 007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.