High Intensity Interval Training in 1% or 10% Slope

NCT ID: NCT02511964

Last Updated: 2015-07-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective was to determine the effect of six running sessions of high intensity interval training (HIIT) at 1% and 10% incline on VO2max, peak of velocity (VPeak), and time limit of 1% (TLim1%) and 10% (TLim10%) of inclination, as well as the influence of the specificity of training on performance in the different inclines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our study is assuming greater activation / muscle overload coming from the uphill running. Accordingly, we believe that in a parallel-group design (1% or 10% gradient) established in controlled and randomized way we could answer the hypothesis that muscle overload provide superior gains to VO2max and aerobic performance. Moreover, considering the first hyphotesis, such developments on the running at 10% slope also promote significant gains in climb performance and also in the plan. Unlike the speculate that the gains from the 1% training does not help performance a 10% incline.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Interval Training at 1% incline

Six Sessions of High Intensity Interval Running (100% VO2Max) at 1% incline; Group metabolically balanced.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interval Training at 1% Incline

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Six Sessions of Running at 1% incline

Interval Training at 10% incline

Six Sessions of High Intensity Interval Running (100% VO2Max) at 10% incline; Group metabolically balanced.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interval Training at 10% Incline

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Six Sessions of Running at 10% incline

Control

Only Dependent Variables Measures

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interval Training at 1% Incline

Six Sessions of Running at 1% incline

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interval Training at 10% Incline

Six Sessions of Running at 10% incline

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HIT in 1% Slope HIIT in 1% Slope HIT in 10% Slope HIIT in 10% Slope

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Minimum standards of physical activity proposed by the ACSM
* Perform running activity at high intensities (HIT)

Exclusion Criteria

* No cardiovascular problems, respiratory or metabolic
* No muscle or joint injuries
* Not to use drugs or ergogenic resources
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alberto Souza de Sá Filho

Doctorade in Mental Health

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sérgio Machado, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UGF 01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The HIIT Cognition Study
NCT05137990 COMPLETED NA
Effects of HIIT in Older Adults
NCT07170579 COMPLETED NA