Adaptations to 4-s Sprint Interval Training at Different Intensities

NCT ID: NCT06906393

Last Updated: 2025-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-30

Study Completion Date

2024-10-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the chronic effects (i.e., 8 weeks, 3 times per week) of training at 50% and 75% of maximal power with 4-s sprint interval training on physiological adaptations. We previously examined the effect of training with an all-out intensity (i.e., 100% of maximal power) and reported increases in cardiorespiratory fitness. Now, we propose to examine the effects of a lower exercise intensity domains on cardiovascular fitness and its ability to stimulate the cardiorespiratory system. We hypothesize that training at 50% and 75% of maximal power will improve cardiorespiratory fitness similar to our previous findings while reducing the rate of perceived exertion during the exercise session. It is anticipated that the group engaged in training at 75% of maximal power will experience greater improvements in comparison to the group training at 50%.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Sprint interval training (SIT) is a well-established method for improving cardiovascular and anaerobic performance. While most research focuses on all-out efforts, less is known about the effects of submaximal sprint intensities on these adaptations. This study examined how training at 50%, 75%, and all-out (85%) of maximal anaerobic power (Pmax) influences aerobic capacity and anaerobic power over an 8-week training period.

Methods

Participants: 24 recreationally active adults (12 females, 12 males) were randomly assigned to one of three training groups:

50% Pmax

75% Pmax

All-out (85% Pmax)

Training Protocol: Participants completed three sessions per week for eight weeks. Each session consisted of thirty 4-second sprints on a cycling ergometer, totaling 10 minutes per session.

Measurements: Peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak) and maximal anaerobic power (Pmax) were assessed before and after the training program.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Fitness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Training group 50% Pmax

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Preventive treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

4-second Sprint Interval Training (SIT) over 8 weeks to improve cardiovascular health.

Training group 75% Pmax

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preventive treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

4-second Sprint Interval Training (SIT) over 8 weeks to improve cardiovascular health.

Training group All-out Pmax

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preventive treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

4-second Sprint Interval Training (SIT) over 8 weeks to improve cardiovascular health.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preventive treatment

4-second Sprint Interval Training (SIT) over 8 weeks to improve cardiovascular health.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Young (18-30),
* Healthy,
* Recreationally active, but untrained (not meeting ACSM's recommendations of 150 min/week of moderate-vigorous aerobic exercise)

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiovascular disease
* Smoking
* Subjects who were exercising regularly (\>75 min/week) were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, the University of Texas at Austin

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00004970

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AM vs PM Exercise Training
NCT06042439 RECRUITING NA