Interval Versus Continuous Training in Healthy Adults

NCT ID: NCT02288403

Last Updated: 2016-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aerobic exercise produces increases in cardiorespiratory fitness (CF), which constitute a protective factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Therefore, aerobic exercise is a key strategy to promoting cardiovascular. There is some evidence that aerobic high intensity interval training may lead to greater increases in CF compared with continuous moderate-intensity training.

The main objective of this study is to examine the effects of an aerobic high intensity training program versus a continuous moderate intensity training program on CF in men 18 to 44 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Forty-four individuals will be randomly assigned to one of two aerobic training programs on a treadmill. Both groups will performed three times a week for eight-weeks (on alternate days). Half will run 40 minutes of continuous exercise at an intensity between 65-75% of maximum heart rate, and the remaining 22 will complete 21.5 minutes of interval exercise at an intensity between 90-95% of maximum heart rate, with recoveries between 50-55 % of maximum heart rate. After each session both groups will complete eight strength exercises mainly including large muscle groups for two sets and 8-12 repetitions at an intensity equivalent to 60-70% of one repetition maximum (controlled by perceived effort). Rest between sets will be kept between 60 and 90 seconds.

All participants will be evaluated at the start and completion of the intervention for their maximal oxygen consumption, blood pressure, waist circumference, BMI, body composition, and steps per week.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Volunteers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aerobic interval training

Interval exercise at an intensity between 90-95% of maximum heart rate (15x30 s), with recoveries at an equivalent speed to 50-55 % of maximal oxygen consumption at baseline (14x60 s).

24 training sessions, 3x weekly (on alternate days).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aerobic interval training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Continuous training

40 minutes of continuous exercise at an intensity between 65-75% of maximum heart rate.

24 training sessions, 3x weekly (on alternate days).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuous training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aerobic interval training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Continuous training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Perform aerobic exercise maximum 3 sessions per week

Exclusion Criteria

* Currently participating in an aerobic high intensity training program
* Smoker
* History of cardiovascular disease
* History of coronary heart disease
* Arrhythmias
* Heart failure/insufficiency
* Hypertension
* Diabetes
* Under medical treatment with anticoagulants, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, bronchodilators, and/or steroids
* Psychological, neuromotor and/or osteo-muscular conditions that may affect participation in an exercise program.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

44 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad de Antioquia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Victor Hugo Arboleda Serna

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Víctor H Arboleda, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor

Elkin F Arango, MD. MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor

Rubén D Gómez, PhD. MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor

Yuri Feito, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad de Antioquia

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arboleda-Serna VH, Feito Y, Patino-Villada FA, Vargas-Romero AV, Arango-Velez EF. Effects of high-intensity interval training compared to moderate-intensity continuous training on maximal oxygen consumption and blood pressure in healthy men: A randomized controlled trial. Biomedica. 2019 Sep 1;39(3):524-536. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.4451.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31584766 (View on PubMed)

Arboleda Serna VH, Arango Velez EF, Gomez Arias RD, Feito Y. Effects of a high-intensity interval training program versus a moderate-intensity continuous training program on maximal oxygen uptake and blood pressure in healthy adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Aug 18;17:413. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1522-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27538896 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HIIT-1-UdeA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cardiometabolic HIIT-RT Study
NCT02715063 COMPLETED NA