High-Intensity Interval Training and Performance

NCT ID: NCT05821504

Last Updated: 2023-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-01

Study Completion Date

2018-11-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial was to compare to different types of high-intensity interval training in young, healthy females. The main questions were: Will changes in body composition differ between the two interventions? Will changes in endurance and muscle performance differ between the two interventions? Participants were randomized to 8 weeks of high-intensity interval training involving body weight, plyometric exercises or cycling only. Researchers compared changes in endurance performance, body composition, and muscle performance to determine if there were differences between groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of plyometric- and cycle-oriented high-intensity interval training on body composition, aerobic capacity, and skeletal muscle size, quality, and function in recreationally trained females. Young (21.7 ± 3.1 yrs), recreationally active females were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of twice weekly plyometric (n = 15) or cycling (n = 15) high-intensity interval training. The plyometric-oriented Les Mills BODYATTACK program was used for the plyometric group whereas Les Mills SPRINT, which exclusively involves stationary cycling, represented the cycling group. Both protocols involved alternating high-intensity and recovery intervals, and participants were consistently instructed to give maximal effort during the 'work' periods.

The 30 min plyometric routines included four blocks of high-intensity exercise intervals. The 'work' portions consisted of the following exercises: high-knee runs, plyometric lunges, jumping jacks, squat jumps, burpees, and speed-agility patterns. The recovery periods consisted of complete rest (transitioning between exercises), a light jog, or a low impact stepping motion. On average, participants were instructed to give maximal effort for 1-2 min, with recovery intervals of 15-45 sec. Four separate routines were used throughout the duration of the study, keeping one routine per week; participants completed each routine a total of 4 times within a session.

The 30 min cycling routines were performed on upright stationary bikes (Schwinn, AC Performance, Chicago, IL). Protocols involved 'work' ranging from 20-80 sec with recovery intervals between 10-60 sec. Recovery intervals consisted of complete rest on bike or particularly slow cycling. Resistance and cycling speed were relatively variable across sessions, with some intervals of higher resistance and lower speed and others involving lower resistance and higher speed (e.g., \>120 RPMs). The same four workouts were used throughout the duration of the study alternating each week.

Body composition (4-compartment model), VO2peak, countermovement jump performance, muscle size and echo intensity (muscle quality) as well as strength and power of the knee extensors and plantar flexors were measured before and after training. Body composition testing was completing using dual-energy x-ray absorpiometry, air displacement plethysmogrphay, and bioeletrical impedance. VO2peak was measured using a standardized maximal exercise test on a treadmill. Countermovement jump height and power was recorded with participants performing jumps on a force plate. Muscle size and quality were determined using non-invasive ultrasonography. Finally, serum growth hormone responses to the VO2peak test were measured before and after the protocols.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two groups performed different types of high-intensity interval training
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plyometric High-Intensity Interval Training

This group performed high-intensity interval training consisting of body-weight, plyometric exercises involving jumping.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-Intensity Interval Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The training intervention is a popular exercise format that consist of alternating brief bouts of high-intensity efforts with bouts of light effort or complete rest.

Cycling High-Intensity Interval Training

This group performed high-intensity interval training consisting of cycling exercise.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-Intensity Interval Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The training intervention is a popular exercise format that consist of alternating brief bouts of high-intensity efforts with bouts of light effort or complete rest.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-Intensity Interval Training

The training intervention is a popular exercise format that consist of alternating brief bouts of high-intensity efforts with bouts of light effort or complete rest.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between 18-35 years of age
* Female
* Currently participating in 2-4 days of structured exercise for 30-75 minutes for the last 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Currently participating in these exercise formats (2x/week within last 3 months)
* Engaging in high intensity interval training for more than 30 min/week
* Have diagnosed disorders/diseases in the following: cardiovascular, pulmonary, immunological, or metabolic
* Current musculoskeletal injuries
* Pregnant or think you may be pregnant
* Currently taking any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug(s) or steroidal drug(s)
* Currently a smoker or has consistently smoked within the last year
* Has a positive written or verbal pre-study drug screen including alcohol (more than 7 drinks/week), THC/cannabinoids, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cocaine, opioids, phencyclidine, barbiturates, cotinine.
* Currently taking any medication that will significantly affect your heart rate response to exercise
* If you miss four or more classes, you will be excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kennesaw State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Garrett Hester

Associate Professor of Exercise Science

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kennesaw State University

Kennesaw, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Holmes AJ, Stratton MT, Bailly AR, Gottschall JS, Feito Y, Ha PL, Lavigne A, Persaud K, Gagnon HL, Krueger A, Modjeski A, Esmat TA, Harper LN, VanDusseldorp TA, Hester GM. Effects of plyometric- and cycle-based high-intensity interval training on body composition, aerobic capacity, and muscle function in young females: a field-based group fitness assessment. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2023 Dec 1;48(12):932-945. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2022-0465. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37556856 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-0465

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High-Intensity Interval Training for Older Adults
NCT05542758 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA