Cardiovascular Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)

NCT ID: NCT03602170

Last Updated: 2019-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-30

Study Completion Date

2018-11-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in comparison to moderate-intensity continuous training (MCT) on blood pressure, blood vessel function, and blood pressure reactivity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is estimated that one-third of the adult population in the United States has blood pressure values that are classified as prehypertension. This slight elevation in blood pressure has been shown to result in an increased risk for developing hypertension and cardiovascular disease. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7) recommends lifestyle modifications for individuals classified as prehypertensive. One lifestyle modification suggested by JNC7 is regular physical activity. Aerobic exercise, like moderate-intensity continuous training (MCT), has been shown to improve blood pressure, blood vessel function, and arterial stiffness in those with prehypertension. However, a major barrier to exercise adherence is the time commitment required. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), which requires individuals to work at higher intensities for shorter durations, may offer an alternative training design that would reduce the time commitment. Previous studies have shown HIIT to be equal to or better at improving cardiorespiratory fitness and blood vessel function in multiple populations. Limited information is present on HIIT training in those with prehypertension. In this study, participants will be randomized into one of the two training program designs mentioned above (MCT or HIIT). Both programs will be completed over an 8-week period (3 sessions per week) and each training session will be supervised. Participants will complete testing visits before and after the training program to collect measures of cardiovascular health (exercise capacity, blood pressure, blood vessel function, and blood pressure reactivity). The goal is to compare the effects of the training programs on these measures of cardiovascular health.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Sedentary Adults With BP <140/90

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High-Intensity Interval Training

8 weeks of high-intensity interval training. Three sessions per week will be performed (24 total sessions).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-Intensity Interval Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Supervised exercise sessions will be performed on a upright cycle ergometer. Training sessions involve 20 minutes of exercise by completing 10 repetitions of 60 seconds of exercise at 90-95% maximal heart rate with 60 seconds of active rest between each repetition at 50-60% maximal heart rate.

Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training

8 weeks of moderate-intensity continuous training. Three sessions per week will be performed (24 total sessions).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Supervised exercise sessions will be performed on a upright cycle ergometer. Training sessions involve 30 minutes of continuous exercise at 65-70% maximal heart rate.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-Intensity Interval Training

Supervised exercise sessions will be performed on a upright cycle ergometer. Training sessions involve 20 minutes of exercise by completing 10 repetitions of 60 seconds of exercise at 90-95% maximal heart rate with 60 seconds of active rest between each repetition at 50-60% maximal heart rate.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training

Supervised exercise sessions will be performed on a upright cycle ergometer. Training sessions involve 30 minutes of continuous exercise at 65-70% maximal heart rate.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Blood Pressure less than 140/90 mmHg
* Sedentary

Exclusion Criteria

* Known or major signs/symptoms of cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, or metabolic disease
* Cancer
* Use of antihypertensive medication
* Current tobacco use
* BMI (body mass index) less than 30 kg/m2
* Postmenopausal
* Current pregnancy
* Current hormone replacement therapy
* Participating in regular aerobic exercise at least three times a week for 30 minutes at a moderate intensity for the past 3 months or more
* Not able to regularly exercise for any reason
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

44 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Delaware

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Edwards

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bryce J Muth, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Delaware

David G Edwards, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Delaware

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1009103-6

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.