High Intensity Interval Training Versus Circuit Training
NCT ID: NCT03700671
Last Updated: 2020-02-17
Study Results
Results available
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
42 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2016-05-11
Study Completion Date
2017-12-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
High intensity interval training (HIIT) and circuit training (CT) are popular methods of exercise, eliciting improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). However direct comparisons of these two training methods are limited.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiovascular Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
NCT03602170
Healthy Sedentary Adults With BP <140/90
COMPLETED
NA
High-intensity Training for Improving Physical Performance of Aged Women
NCT03840330
Aging
Healthy
Cardiovascular Risk Factor
+1 more
COMPLETED
NA
The Effect of Novel High-intensity Interval Training on Physical Fitness in Older Adults
NCT02714088
High-intensity Interval Training
COMPLETED
NA
High Intensity Interval Circuit Training on Resting Metabolic Rate in Overweight Adults
NCT03972059
Overweight and Obesity
COMPLETED
NA
Can 2 Weeks of High Intensity Interval Training in Healthy 65-85 Year-olds Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness?
NCT03331679
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Design Participants were enrolled in a randomised control trial at the University of Hull to either eight weeks of High intensity interval training (HIIT) or Circuit Training (CT) (two supervised sessions per week, accompanied by an exercise physiologist). A sample size of 38 using G Power 3.1 software was calculated based on previously published data in which the mean difference between HIIT and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) was 3.2 ml.kg-1.min-1 with a pooled standard deviation of 3 ml.kg-1.min-1. Statistical significance was set at 0.05 and power set to 0.95. To allow for 10% attrition 42 individuals were recruited to the study. To assess the effectiveness of the interventions as determined by maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to volitional exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer at baseline (visit one), and following an eight-week exercise intervention of HIIT or CT (visit two) was conducted. When attending the assessments participants were asked not to take part in any strenuous exercise 24 hours prior to the appointment, to wear suitable comfortable clothing and avoid a large meal. Visit two CPET was performed within six days of completing the exercise interventions. A thorough warm-up and cool down before and after each exercise session. All were asked to maintain their habitual physical activity patterns during the intervention. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing body weight by height in meters squared and was presented as kg.m-2. Resting blood pressure was measured after 15 minutes of rest using a sphygmomanometer (A.C. Cossor \& Son Ltd, London UK) and stethoscope (3M Healthcare, St Paul, MN). To provide a comprehensive account of the study the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) was consulted.
Participants Ethical approval was provided by the School of Life Sciences ethics committee at the University of Hull which was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. A total of 42 apparently healthy men and women between the age of 18-65 years were recruited to the study. Enrolled individuals reported no medical history of cardiometabolic or limiting respiratory disease, were non-smokers, had a body mass index \<30 kg.m-2, classified as recreationally active and none were taking any medication that would affect heart rate. As a condition of enrolment, those over 45 years obtained written medical clearance from a general practitioner and underwent resting and exercise 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom). Written informed consent and a pre-exercise medical questionnaire was completed by all.
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Maximal CPETs were conducted in accordance with the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. An Oxycon pro (Jaeger, Hoechburg, Germany) breath by breath metabolic cart was used to collect respiratory gas exchange data. Automatic and manual calibration evaluated ambient temperature, humidity, barometric pressure and altitude. Calibration of the air flow volume was conducted using a 3 litre syringe and by automatic calibration. Two-point gas calibration was also conducted to ensure accurate measures of inspired oxygen and expired carbon dioxide. Tests were performed on a GE e-bike ergometer (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) using a ramp protocol. The protocol consisted of a three-minute rest phase, three minutes of unloaded cycling, followed by a personalised ramp test (ramp rate ranged between 15 and 30 watts) with work rate continually increased every one to three seconds. Participants performed the same ramp rate pre and post testing. Participants were asked to pedal at a cadence of 70 rpm until they reached volitional exhaustion at a protocol duration between eight to twelve minutes. Self-reported rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scores using the 6-20 scale and heart rate (HR) (FT1 heart rate monitor, Polar Electro, Finland) was recorded during the last five seconds of each minute of the test, at maximum exercise and during the recovery period. Together with verbal encouragement to volitional exhaustion, VO2max was attained by participants achieving at least two of the following criteria, VO2 plateau as determined by a failure of VO2 increase by 150 ml/min with further increases in workload analysed by breath by breath gas exchange data averaged over 15 seconds, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) \> 1.10, achieve \> 85% age predicated heart rate maximum (HRmax) and a RPE \> 17 on the 6-20 Borg scale. VO2 at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) was defined using the V slope method and verified using ventilatory equivalents. Peak power output (PPO) (watts) and HRmax were defined as the highest value achieved during the CPET with maximum oxygen and heart rate (VO2 /HR) determined by the ratio of VO2max and HRmax.
Training Interventions The HIIT group were asked to perform ten one-minute HIIT intervals, each followed by one minute of active recovery (AR) (total exercise time 20 minutes). Resulting from the CPET, HIIT was set at above 85% HRmax with a specific HR designated for this criterion. Active recovery was set at a load corresponding to 25-50 watts. Sessions were performed on a Wattbike trainer (Wattbike Ltd, Nottingham, UK). The CT group completed a practical seven-station mixed modality exercise circuit (cycle ergometer, rower, treadmill, sit to stand/squats, knee to elbow and leg kickback with bicep curl) at an intensity of 60-80% HRmax (calculated from CPET). No resistance equipment was involved, only body weight. Participants initially performed 20 minutes of CT with duration increased by five minutes per week until the desired 40 minutes. Each station was occupied for three to six minutes depending on session duration, moving from one station to the next with minimal rest. During both interventions, HR was measured in last 5 seconds of each station/interval using a FT1 polar heart rate monitor (Polar Electro, Finland) with each CT session timed using a stop watch (Axprod S.L, Guipuzcoa, Spain). Intensity for both interventions was adjusted throughout by the investigator to ensure an appropriate HR range and successful completion of the protocol. Participants were made aware of their HR ranges and verbal encouragement was given by the physiologist to help achieve and maintain these thresholds. Energy expenditure between HIIT and CT was not matched.
To assess the validity of the exercise interventions, participant fidelity to the desired exercise intensity was determined using cut points of \>85% HRmax and 60-80% HRmax for HIIT and CT respectively and reported using previous examples. These values were calculated using the participants mean heart rate for each individual interval or station over the 16 sessions and was expressed as a percentage of HRmax as determined by CPET at visit 1. Specific fidelity thresholds were consulted to determine low (\<50%), moderate (50-70%) and high (\>70%) compliance. Adherence was determined as a percentage of completed sessions, with 14 (\> 85%) being the threshold for completion.
Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 (IBM, New York, USA). An independent t-test was used to identify group differences at baseline. Assumptions of normality were verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Skewness and kurtosis of distribution was visually examined. Non-normally distributed data was presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). A two-way (condition x time) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare CRF pre-and post-training. Post-hoc analysis for the main effects and interactions was assessed using a Bonferroni adjustment. Group differences were compared using independent t tests. Variables were displayed as mean with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) or standard deviation where specified. Partial eta squared effect sizes were also calculated with 0.01, 0.06 and 0.14 representing small, medium and large effect sizes, respectively.
Participants Ethical approval was provided by the School of Life Sciences ethics committee at the University of Hull which was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. A total of 42 apparently healthy men and women between the age of 18-65 years were recruited to the study. Enrolled individuals reported no medical history of cardiometabolic or limiting respiratory disease, were non-smokers, had a body mass index \<30 kg.m-2, classified as recreationally active and none were taking any medication that would affect heart rate. As a condition of enrolment, those over 45 years obtained written medical clearance from a general practitioner and underwent resting and exercise 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom). Written informed consent and a pre-exercise medical questionnaire was completed by all.
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Maximal CPETs were conducted in accordance with the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. An Oxycon pro (Jaeger, Hoechburg, Germany) breath by breath metabolic cart was used to collect respiratory gas exchange data. Automatic and manual calibration evaluated ambient temperature, humidity, barometric pressure and altitude. Calibration of the air flow volume was conducted using a 3 litre syringe and by automatic calibration. Two-point gas calibration was also conducted to ensure accurate measures of inspired oxygen and expired carbon dioxide. Tests were performed on a GE e-bike ergometer (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) using a ramp protocol. The protocol consisted of a three-minute rest phase, three minutes of unloaded cycling, followed by a personalised ramp test (ramp rate ranged between 15 and 30 watts) with work rate continually increased every one to three seconds. Participants performed the same ramp rate pre and post testing. Participants were asked to pedal at a cadence of 70 rpm until they reached volitional exhaustion at a protocol duration between eight to twelve minutes. Self-reported rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scores using the 6-20 scale and heart rate (HR) (FT1 heart rate monitor, Polar Electro, Finland) was recorded during the last five seconds of each minute of the test, at maximum exercise and during the recovery period. Together with verbal encouragement to volitional exhaustion, VO2max was attained by participants achieving at least two of the following criteria, VO2 plateau as determined by a failure of VO2 increase by 150 ml/min with further increases in workload analysed by breath by breath gas exchange data averaged over 15 seconds, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) \> 1.10, achieve \> 85% age predicated heart rate maximum (HRmax) and a RPE \> 17 on the 6-20 Borg scale. VO2 at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) was defined using the V slope method and verified using ventilatory equivalents. Peak power output (PPO) (watts) and HRmax were defined as the highest value achieved during the CPET with maximum oxygen and heart rate (VO2 /HR) determined by the ratio of VO2max and HRmax.
Training Interventions The HIIT group were asked to perform ten one-minute HIIT intervals, each followed by one minute of active recovery (AR) (total exercise time 20 minutes). Resulting from the CPET, HIIT was set at above 85% HRmax with a specific HR designated for this criterion. Active recovery was set at a load corresponding to 25-50 watts. Sessions were performed on a Wattbike trainer (Wattbike Ltd, Nottingham, UK). The CT group completed a practical seven-station mixed modality exercise circuit (cycle ergometer, rower, treadmill, sit to stand/squats, knee to elbow and leg kickback with bicep curl) at an intensity of 60-80% HRmax (calculated from CPET). No resistance equipment was involved, only body weight. Participants initially performed 20 minutes of CT with duration increased by five minutes per week until the desired 40 minutes. Each station was occupied for three to six minutes depending on session duration, moving from one station to the next with minimal rest. During both interventions, HR was measured in last 5 seconds of each station/interval using a FT1 polar heart rate monitor (Polar Electro, Finland) with each CT session timed using a stop watch (Axprod S.L, Guipuzcoa, Spain). Intensity for both interventions was adjusted throughout by the investigator to ensure an appropriate HR range and successful completion of the protocol. Participants were made aware of their HR ranges and verbal encouragement was given by the physiologist to help achieve and maintain these thresholds. Energy expenditure between HIIT and CT was not matched.
To assess the validity of the exercise interventions, participant fidelity to the desired exercise intensity was determined using cut points of \>85% HRmax and 60-80% HRmax for HIIT and CT respectively and reported using previous examples. These values were calculated using the participants mean heart rate for each individual interval or station over the 16 sessions and was expressed as a percentage of HRmax as determined by CPET at visit 1. Specific fidelity thresholds were consulted to determine low (\<50%), moderate (50-70%) and high (\>70%) compliance. Adherence was determined as a percentage of completed sessions, with 14 (\> 85%) being the threshold for completion.
Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 (IBM, New York, USA). An independent t-test was used to identify group differences at baseline. Assumptions of normality were verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Skewness and kurtosis of distribution was visually examined. Non-normally distributed data was presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). A two-way (condition x time) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare CRF pre-and post-training. Post-hoc analysis for the main effects and interactions was assessed using a Bonferroni adjustment. Group differences were compared using independent t tests. Variables were displayed as mean with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) or standard deviation where specified. Partial eta squared effect sizes were also calculated with 0.01, 0.06 and 0.14 representing small, medium and large effect sizes, respectively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
High Intensity Interval Training
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Participants were randomised to either high or moderate intensity exercise
Primary Study Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High intensity interval training
HIIT was set at \> 85% HRmax. Active recovery was set at 25-50 watts. Sessions were performed using cycle ergometry.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
High intensity interval training
Intervention Type
OTHER
Participants performed HIIT twice a week for eight weeks. Findings were compared to moderate intensity continuous training which followed the same exercise frequency and duration
Circuit training
The CT group completed a practical seven-station mixed modality exercise circuit (cycle ergometer, rower, treadmill, sit to stand, knee to elbow and leg kickback with bicep curl) at an intensity of 60-80%. Participants initially performed 20 minutes of CT with duration gradually increased to the desired 40 minutes as tolerated. Each station was occupied for three to six minutes depending on session duration with minimal rest in-between.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Circuit training
Intervention Type
OTHER
The CT group completed a practical seven-station mixed modality exercise circuit (cycle ergometer, rower, treadmill, sit to stand, knee to elbow and leg kickback with bicep curl) at an intensity of 60-80% HRmax twice per week for eight weeks. Participants initially performed 20 minutes of CT with duration gradually increased to the desired 40 minutes as tolerated
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High intensity interval training
Participants performed HIIT twice a week for eight weeks. Findings were compared to moderate intensity continuous training which followed the same exercise frequency and duration
Intervention Type
OTHER
Circuit training
The CT group completed a practical seven-station mixed modality exercise circuit (cycle ergometer, rower, treadmill, sit to stand, knee to elbow and leg kickback with bicep curl) at an intensity of 60-80% HRmax twice per week for eight weeks. Participants initially performed 20 minutes of CT with duration gradually increased to the desired 40 minutes as tolerated
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants reported no medical history of cardiometabolic or limiting respiratory disease, were non-smokers, had a body mass index \<30 kg.m-2, classified as recreationally active
Exclusion Criteria
* Cardiometabolic disease, high activity levels, Unable to tolerate the exercise intervention
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
65 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Hull
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Central Lancashire
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stefan Birkett
Lecturer in Exercise Science
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan Birkett, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Central Lancashire
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Univeristy of Hull
Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, United Kingdom
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United Kingdom
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Despres JP, Franklin BA, Haskell WL, Kaminsky LA, Levine BD, Lavie CJ, Myers J, Niebauer J, Sallis R, Sawada SS, Sui X, Wisloff U; American Heart Association Physical Activity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Stroke Council. Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):e653-e699. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Beckie TM, Brubaker PH, Church TS, Forman DE, Franklin BA, Gulati M, Lavie CJ, Myers J, Patel MJ, Pina IL, Weintraub WS, Williams MA; American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. The importance of cardiorespiratory fitness in the United States: the need for a national registry: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013 Feb 5;127(5):652-62. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31827ee100. Epub 2013 Jan 7. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lee DC, Artero EG, Sui X, Blair SN. Mortality trends in the general population: the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness. J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Nov;24(4 Suppl):27-35. doi: 10.1177/1359786810382057.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weston KS, Wisloff U, Coombes JS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;48(16):1227-34. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092576. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weston M, Taylor KL, Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) on fitness in adults: a meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Med. 2014 Jul;44(7):1005-17. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0180-z.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Taylor KL, Weston M, Batterham AM. Evaluating intervention fidelity: an example from a high-intensity interval training study. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0125166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125166. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gibala MJ, Little JP, Macdonald MJ, Hawley JA. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J Physiol. 2012 Mar 1;590(5):1077-84. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.224725. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
McGregor G, Nichols S, Hamborg T, Bryning L, Tudor-Edwards R, Markland D, Mercer J, Birkett S, Ennis S, Powell R, Begg B, Haykowsky MJ, Banerjee P, Ingle L, Shave R, Backx K. High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity steady-state training in UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes (HIIT or MISS UK): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 16;6(11):e012843. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012843.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Esfandiari S, Sasson Z, Goodman JM. Short-term high-intensity interval and continuous moderate-intensity training improve maximal aerobic power and diastolic filling during exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Feb;114(2):331-43. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2773-x. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sawyer BJ, Tucker WJ, Bhammar DM, Ryder JR, Sweazea KL, Gaesser GA. Effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers in obese adults. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Jul 1;121(1):279-88. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2016. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Baekkerud FH, Solberg F, Leinan IM, Wisloff U, Karlsen T, Rognmo O. Comparison of Three Popular Exercise Modalities on V O2max in Overweight and Obese. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):491-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000777.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Boyd JC, Simpson CA, Jung ME, Gurd BJ. Reducing the intensity and volume of interval training diminishes cardiovascular adaptation but not mitochondrial biogenesis in overweight/obese men. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e68091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068091. Print 2013.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stavrinou PS, Bogdanis GC, Giannaki CD, Terzis G, Hadjicharalambous M. High-intensity Interval Training Frequency: Cardiometabolic Effects and Quality of Life. Int J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;39(3):210-217. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-125074. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hood MS, Little JP, Tarnopolsky MA, Myslik F, Gibala MJ. Low-volume interval training improves muscle oxidative capacity in sedentary adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Oct;43(10):1849-56. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182199834.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Little JP, Gillen JB, Percival ME, Safdar A, Tarnopolsky MA, Punthakee Z, Jung ME, Gibala MJ. Low-volume high-intensity interval training reduces hyperglycemia and increases muscle mitochondrial capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Dec;111(6):1554-60. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00921.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Slade SC, Dionne CE, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;50(23):1428-1437. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096651. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ross RM. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 May 15;167(10):1451; author reply 1451. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.167.10.950. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Jun;60(6):2020-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.6.2020.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Ray K, Boren J, Andreotti F, Watts GF, Ginsberg H, Amarenco P, Catapano A, Descamps OS, Fisher E, Kovanen PT, Kuivenhoven JA, Lesnik P, Masana L, Reiner Z, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Tybjaerg-Hansen A; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor: current status. Eur Heart J. 2010 Dec;31(23):2844-53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq386. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Richardson JTE. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review. 2011;6(2):135-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Matsuo T, Saotome K, Seino S, Eto M, Shimojo N, Matsushita A, Iemitsu M, Ohshima H, Tanaka K, Mukai C. Low-volume, high-intensity, aerobic interval exercise for sedentary adults: VO(2)max, cardiac mass, and heart rate recovery. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Sep;114(9):1963-72. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2917-7. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ingle L, Mellis M, Brodie D, Sandercock GR. Associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and the metabolic syndrome in British men. Heart. 2017 Apr;103(7):524-528. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310142. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, Maki M, Yachi Y, Asumi M, Sugawara A, Totsuka K, Shimano H, Ohashi Y, Yamada N, Sone H. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009 May 20;301(19):2024-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.681.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Currie KD, Dubberley JB, McKelvie RS, MacDonald MJ. Low-volume, high-intensity interval training in patients with CAD. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Aug;45(8):1436-42. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31828bbbd4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
McKay BR, Paterson DH, Kowalchuk JM. Effect of short-term high-intensity interval training vs. continuous training on O2 uptake kinetics, muscle deoxygenation, and exercise performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Jul;107(1):128-38. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90828.2008. Epub 2009 May 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Montero D, Lundby C. Refuting the myth of non-response to exercise training: 'non-responders' do respond to higher dose of training. J Physiol. 2017 Jun 1;595(11):3377-3387. doi: 10.1113/JP273480. Epub 2017 May 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bhambhani Y, Norris S, Bell G. Prediction of stroke volume from oxygen pulse measurements in untrained and trained men. Can J Appl Physiol. 1994 Mar;19(1):49-59. doi: 10.1139/h94-003.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Daussin FN, Ponsot E, Dufour SP, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Doutreleau S, Geny B, Piquard F, Richard R. Improvement of VO2max by cardiac output and oxygen extraction adaptation during intermittent versus continuous endurance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Oct;101(3):377-83. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0499-3. Epub 2007 Jul 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Little JP, Safdar A, Wilkin GP, Tarnopolsky MA, Gibala MJ. A practical model of low-volume high-intensity interval training induces mitochondrial biogenesis in human skeletal muscle: potential mechanisms. J Physiol. 2010 Mar 15;588(Pt 6):1011-22. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181743. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Astorino TA, Edmunds RM, Clark A, King L, Gallant RA, Namm S, Fischer A, Wood KM. High-Intensity Interval Training Increases Cardiac Output and V O2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Feb;49(2):265-273. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001099.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Helgerud J, Hoydal K, Wang E, Karlsen T, Berg P, Bjerkaas M, Simonsen T, Helgesen C, Hjorth N, Bach R, Hoff J. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Apr;39(4):665-71. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180304570.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ziemann E, Grzywacz T, Luszczyk M, Laskowski R, Olek RA, Gibson AL. Aerobic and anaerobic changes with high-intensity interval training in active college-aged men. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Apr;25(4):1104-12. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ec9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Astorino TA, deRevere J, Anderson T, Kellogg E, Holstrom P, Ring S, Ghaseb N. Change in VO2max and time trial performance in response to high-intensity interval training prescribed using ventilatory threshold. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Sep;118(9):1811-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3910-3. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ghosh AK. Anaerobic threshold: its concept and role in endurance sport. Malays J Med Sci. 2004 Jan;11(1):24-36.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fortington LV, Donaldson A, Lathlean T, Young WB, Gabbe BJ, Lloyd D, Finch CF. When 'just doing it' is not enough: assessing the fidelity of player performance of an injury prevention exercise program. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 May;18(3):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tucker WJ, Sawyer BJ, Jarrett CL, Bhammar DM, Gaesser GA. Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Differing in Interval Duration. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Dec;29(12):3326-35. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001000.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med. 2013 Oct;43(10):927-54. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0066-5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ciolac EG, Mantuani SS, Neiva CM, Verardi C, Pessoa-Filho DM, Pimenta L. Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study. Biol Sport. 2015 Jun;32(2):103-8. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1134312. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Blair SN, Morris JN. Healthy hearts--and the universal benefits of being physically active: physical activity and health. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.01.019.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Blair SN, Kohl HW 3rd, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989 Nov 3;262(17):2395-401. doi: 10.1001/jama.262.17.2395.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hardcastle SJ, Ray H, Beale L, Hagger MS. Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population. Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 23;5:1505. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01505. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weston M, Batterham AM, Tew GA, Kothmann E, Kerr K, Nawaz S, Yates D, Danjoux G. Patients Awaiting Surgical Repair for Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Can Exercise at Moderate to Hard Intensities with a Low Risk of Adverse Events. Front Physiol. 2017 Jan 9;7:684. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00684. eCollection 2016.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hurst C, Weston KL, Weston M. The effect of 12 weeks of combined upper- and lower-body high-intensity interval training on muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1015-9. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UCentralLancashire
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
HIT in the Healthy Elderly Population
NCT02167191
COMPLETED
NA
Comparing HICT and MICT for Health Improvements in Overweight Young Adults
NCT07008326
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Low-frequency High-Intensity Interval Training in Overweight or Obese Young Adults
NCT03904810
COMPLETED
NA
High Intensity Interval Training Versus Low-intensity Continuous Training on Physical Fitness Among Overweight Adult
NCT04932174
UNKNOWN
NA
Effects of High-intensity Interval Training and Moderate-intensity Continuous Training on Functioning of Attentional Networks and Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults
NCT06602700
COMPLETED
NA
Regulation of Different IT on Vascular Function of Overweight Female University Students
NCT06658509
COMPLETED
NA
Higher Enjoyment in Response to High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise
NCT02981667
COMPLETED
Spinning-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Induces Greater Cardiopulmonary Adaptations Than Continuous Training in Sedentary College Men
NCT07309237
COMPLETED
NA
Effect of Exercise With Low Intensity and Longer Duration Versus High Intensity Interval Training
NCT01443507
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Optimal Frequency of High-Intensity Interval Training for Centrally Obese Adults
NCT04887454
COMPLETED
NA
The Relationship Between Exercise Frequency, Intensity, and Restoration of Cardiometabolic Health
NCT03376685
COMPLETED
NA
High Intensity Interval Training vs Moderate Continuous Endurance Exercise Training on Program Adherence
NCT03357601
UNKNOWN
NA
Regulation of HIIT Combined with IET on Vascular Function in Young Women with Normal Weight Obesity
NCT06556875
COMPLETED
NA
Home-Based High Intensity Interval Training Intervention for Low Active Adults
NCT03479177
COMPLETED
NA
Short-term, Home-based, High-intensity Interval Training (HIT) for Improving Fitness
NCT03473990
COMPLETED
NA
A Comparison of High-intensity Interval Training Protocols on Health and Fitness
NCT03093441
COMPLETED
NA
The Effect of Exercise Intensity on Adherence
NCT05057416
UNKNOWN
NA
Exercise Training in Women With Heart Disease 2
NCT06494163
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
The Effects of High Intensity Circuit Training in Nature Vs. Indoor on Exercise Performance, and Wellbeing
NCT05090501
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of Different Exercise Trainings on Heart Rate Variability
NCT05215275
COMPLETED
NA
Effects of Short Duration High-intensity Interval Training on Peak Oxygen Consumption
NCT04656509
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) on Improving Cardiometabolic Health After SCI
NCT03808363
COMPLETED
NA
The Effectiveness and Safety of HIIT in Overweight Male Subjects
NCT05000437
COMPLETED
NA
Acute Effects of HIIT and SSMIT on Intraocular Pressure Among Sedentary Individuals
NCT04133857
COMPLETED
NA