Comparison of Supine to Prone Position During Major Spinal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02285946

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During mechanical ventilation, the alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) is to apply a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (generally 30 cm H2O) for a period of at least 30 seconds. The realization of MRA is one of three main elements of mechanical ventilation called "protective". This ventilatory strategy, originally described for the ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and pulmonary and during abdominal surgery is based on a decrease tidal volumes, optimization of PEEP and the realization of MRA. Protective ventilation limit the occurrence of atelectasis, the surdistentions and, ultimately, significantly decreases postoperative complications.

The MRA is currently recommended in the "major" surgery. Most spine surgery (eg transpedicular fixation) used in this definition, the MRA are indicated and now commonly used. This type of surgery requires further positioning the patient in the prone position (DV). The DV modifies the compliance of the chest respiratory characteristics and changes (increase in insufflation pressure) and hemodynamic (decreased venous return) of the patient.

Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of MRA made VIS at major spine surgery are not known. The aim of this observational study, non-interventional, is to compare the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of MRA performed in DV to those of MRA performed in the prone position (DD).

The investigators hypothesis is that the respiratory and hemodynamic consequences of MRA performed in DV is different from those conducted in DD. A better understanding of hemodynamic and respiratory characteristics of MRA performed in DV would provide a more tailored to this type of surgery respiratory optimization strategy and reduce respiratory complications of this surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteotomies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

major spine surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patient

Patient operated major spine surgery, including:

* The transpedicular osteotomies
* Tumor spinal surgery (sarcoma, osteosarcoma) or metastatic
* Degenerative spinal surgery on multiple vertebral levels and degraded land
* Surgery of scoliosis

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to give informed patient information (eg difficulty of understanding)
* Patient under guardianship - Patient pregnant or during lactation - Detainees or under judicial protection.
* contraindications to MRA: emphysema, pneumothorax, major hypovolemia, hemodynamic instability defined as systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg or tachycardia greater than 110 bpm.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

COLLANGE Olivier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Strasbourg University Hospital, France

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service D'Anesthesiologie - Nhc

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.