Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
34 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-31
2027-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
During general anaesthesia, ventilation disorders with atelectasis, derecruitment of posteroinferior zones and reduced functional residual capacity (FRC) occur in relation to the operative position, the effect of neuromuscular block and general anaesthesia. These conditions of poor pulmonary aeration favor postoperative respiratory complications and are responsible for excess mortality in the perioperative period.
Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) are ventilatory strategies used during general anesthesia that aim to restore lung aeration with Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) sufficient to keep the lungs open afterwards. This pulmonary hyperinflation not only has a major impact on hemodynamics but also presents a risk of barotrauma. ARM is currently performed without precise measurement of the pressures prevailing in the lung.
Advanced monitoring is now available and integrated into the latest-generation ventilators and includes the combination of Transpulmonary pressure (TPP) and Electro-Impedance Tomography " (EIT) measurements.
The aim of this observational study is to measure and record advanced respiratory monitoring data in a minimally invasive way, during alveolar recruitment tests routinely performed for the target population (obese, prone, laparoscopic surgery). Describe and a posteriori analyze the recorded data and establish a relationship between the PEEP values set by conventional ARM and those determined by advanced monitoring combining EIT and PTP for the same patient.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Hemodynamic Effect of 2 Methods for Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver in Anesthetized Patients
NCT03215329
Optimal Interval for Periodic Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers Achieving 90% Lung Re-expansion During Intraoperative Ventilation
NCT07239557
Intra-operative Ventilatory Management & Post-operative Pulmonary Complications
NCT03551899
The Role of Periodic Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers in Intraoperative Protective Ventilation
NCT05962125
Optimization of PEEP During Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT05222893
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) are ventilatory strategies used during general anesthesia that aim to restore lung aeration with a Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) sufficient to keep the lungs open afterwards. These maneuvers can be performed in a variety of ways but generally involve gradually increasing the level of airway pressure, followed by a stepwise decrease to an end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level decided by the practitioner based on monitoring data and considering the clinical outcome and hemodynamic tolerance of the maneuver.
Atelectasis essentially occurs when the pressure in the alveolus at the end of expiration is lower than the pressure that allows the alveolus to remain open (critical opening pressure). The principle is to transiently increase transpulmonary pressure (TTP) (the difference between airway pressure (Paw) and pleural pressure) above the critical opening pressure.
Maintaining alveolar end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) after the maneuver is essential to avoid de-recruitment. The concept of the alveolar recruitment maneuver is very popular in our specialty. The benefits and importance of this alveolar recruitment strategy were initially identified in intensive care patients. Particular attention is now being paid to lung-free patients in the operating theatre, especially those with obesity, during long prone surgeries and during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Currently, the benefits of ARM are also being seen, with a reduced risk of serious pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications in the first 7 days postoperatively for this type of patient.
Currently, these maneuvers are performed directly on ventilators that incorporate an automated, programmable procedure. The technique consists in gradually increasing inspiratory pressure to 40 cmH2O and PEEP to 20 cmH2O, the incremental phase. As soon as the maximum pressure level is reached, a progressive decrement phase follows. Three parameters need to be set: maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum PEEP and maneuver duration. The level of PEEP at which the alveoli theoretically remain open is determined by monitoring the patient's compliance and tidal volume. This pulmonary hyperinflation not only has a major impact on hemodynamics but also presents a risk of barotrauma. ARM is currently performed without transpulmonary pressure measurement and with this procedure.
For this reason, new-generation ventilators are equipped with an esophageal pressure proxy for pleural pressure, enabling precise calculation of transpulmonary pressure. Only direct measurement of the parameters characterizing the state of the entire respiratory system enables individual, patient-specific adjustment of the critical opening pressure of the alveoli.
Advanced monitoring is now available and integrated into the latest-generation ventilators, and includes the following combination of measurements obtained from the monitors:
1. Ventilator-integrated
* Transpulmonary pressure (TPP) is defined as the difference between airway pressure and pleural pressure and provides essential information for individual patient needs on chest wall mechanics, lung mechanics and effects on the respiratory and circulatory systems. Estimation of trans-pulmonary pressure (TPP), pulmonary stress and critical opening pressure is obtained via esophageal manometry (proxy for pleural pressure), the use of which is recommended by several learned societies and is the subject of numerous studies.
* The study of lung volumes (end-expiratory lung volume, EELV, and a substitute for functional respiratory capacity (FRC) via the study of exhaled CO2 kinetics (volumetric capnography and dynamic capnometry).
2. Electro-Impedance Tomography (EIT) Electro-Impedance Tomography (EIT) provides a totally non-invasive, cross-sectional visualization of part of the pulmonary aeration, both dynamically and regionally. Current technology also enables us to assess pulmonary perfusion (and thus ventilation/perfusion ratios).
Advantages of this augmented and integrative respiratory monitoring approach during mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia:
1. Limiting pulmonary stress, excessive and individualizing the setting of tidal volume (TV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to optimize the acceptable recruitment/distension balance.
2. Obtain information on the gas exchanger and the impact of PEEP-VT optimization on gas exchange.
These maneuvers, with their risk of alveolar overdistension, are potentially dangerous for patients with airway pathologies or difficult ventilator adaptation conditions.
Consequently, the practice of applying a fixed standardized maneuver to a particular patient is risky, and more rigorous control of the optimal end-expiratory pressure level PEEP (critical opening pressure) from advanced monitoring data would be desirable. Customization of this alveolar recruitment maneuver is particularly suited to the population we will be studying (obese, prone, laparoscopic surgery).
The application of MRA during anesthesia normalizes pulmonary function intraoperatively. There is physiological evidence that patients of all ages, whatever the type of surgery, benefit from such active intervention. The risks must be minimized.
The aim of this observational study is to measure and record advanced respiratory monitoring data in a minimally invasive way, during alveolar recruitment tests routinely performed for the target population (obese, prone, laparoscopic surgery). To combine data on ventilation/perfusion ratios measured by EIT with optimization of the aeric ventilatory side. Describe and analyze the recorded data a posteriori and establish a relationship between the PEEP values set by conventional ARM and those determined from advanced monitoring combining EIT and TPP. These analyses will enable us to assess the complementarity and added value of these values in practice, and the respective usefulness of the different indices.
Given the enormous volume of patients mechanically ventilated during general anesthesia, optimizing alveolar recruitment by limiting pulmonary and systemic aggression is a key objective for further progress in perioperative patient management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous measurement of esophageal pressure Peso (cmH2O)
This parameter will be recorded during the alveolar recruitment maneuvers routinely performed during general anesthesia.
Measurement of impedance variation with each respiratory cycle (EIT), Z in ohm
This parameter will be recorded during the alveolar recruitment maneuvers routinely performed during general anesthesia
Measurement of regional respiratory compliance (EIT), Ohm/cmH2O
This parameter will be recorded during the alveolar recruitment maneuvers routinely performed during general anesthesia
Measurement of lung volumes (EELV or CRF) mL, (ml/kg)
These parameters will be recorded during the alveolar recruitment maneuvers routinely performed during general anesthesia
Continuous measurement of multiparametric monitoring data in place (hemodynamics, depth of sedation, respiratory data, temperature).
These parameters will be recorded during the alveolar recruitment maneuvers routinely performed during general anesthesia
Quantification of delivered doses of hypnotics, morphine and paralytics
These parameters will be recorded during the alveolar recruitment maneuvers routinely performed during general anesthesia
Demographic criteria: age, sex, height, weight, BMI, theoretical ideal weight, ASA. - Procedure-related criteria: type of surgery, technique (laparoscopic, endoscopic, laparoscopic), position, duratio
These parameters will be recorded during the perioperative hospitalization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. undergoing :
* scheduled surgery at Hospital Lariboisière.
* scheduled to last more than 2 hours under general anesthesia for abdominal surgery under laparoscopy or surgery in the prone position, or for obese patients with a BMI \>35.
* And for whom the ventilator used includes advanced monitoring
* for whom placement of a gastric tube is indicated either because of the duration of the procedure or because it is necessary for the surgery.
3. Patient informed and expressing non-opposition to participation in this study
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindications to esophageal tube placement
* Contraindications to ARMs
* Patient opposed to protocol participation
* Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding women
* Patient under legal protection
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
M3DISIM
OTHER
INSERM UMR-942, Paris, France
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AP-HP, Lariboisière Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris, France, 75010
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A01853-44
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
APHP241304
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.