Lung-protective Mechanical Ventilation for Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT04546932
Last Updated: 2020-09-14
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
62 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2020-01-15
Study Completion Date
2020-06-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This was a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. 62 patients were randomly assigned to receive either lung-protective ventilation (LPV) with a tidal volume (Vt) of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight (IBW), 10 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) combined with regular recruitment maneuvers or conventional ventilation (CV) with a Vt of 10 ml/kg IBW, 0 cmH2O in PEEP and no recruitment maneuvers. The primary endpoints were the intraoperative fluctuation of Cdyn and Cstat, the intra- and postoperative changes in pulmonary oxygenation function including OI, A-aO2. The secondary endpoints were the alteration on chest x-ray, modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (mCPIS), and the incidence of PPCs on the first postoperative day
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimal Interval for Periodic Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers Achieving 90% Lung Re-expansion During Intraoperative Ventilation
NCT07239557
Major Abdominal Surgery
Atelectasis
Lung-protective Ventilation
+2 more
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Protective Mechanical Ventilation and Risk of Postoperative Complications in Abdominal Surgery
NCT03165760
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
Mechanical Ventilation Complication
Postoperative Complications
COMPLETED
NA
Pressure Controlled Ventilation Versus Volume Controlled Ventilation in Upper Abdominal Surgery
NCT05690867
Ventilator Lung
COMPLETED
NA
Obesity Alters Lung Mechanics in Robotic Surgery
NCT04329910
Obesity
Surgery
Anesthesia
COMPLETED
Non Invasive Ventilation in Abdominal Postoperative Period
NCT01971892
Surgery
Trauma to the Abdomen
Acute Respiratory Failure
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study population. We performed a randomized, double-blind controlled trial at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital from January 2020 to July 2020. The trial protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee of Vietnam Military Medical University and Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, simultaneously written informed consent was obtained from all patients before inclusion.
Randomization and blinding technique. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either lung-protective ventilation (LPV group) or conventional ventilation (CV group) at a ratio of 1:1. The randomization was performed using the R program with the "runif", "as.integer", "int" and "replace" functions. As a result, a list of random numbers was created in each group. The patients were numbered according to their orders of hospital registration and then were allocated into the group of their numbers. The intervention protocol was stored in sealed, opaque numbered envelopes. An anesthesiologist who did not involve in the study set the ventilator in accordance with the protocol in the envelopes. Another anesthetist who was in charge of the patient collected data during surgery. The surgeons taking part in the procedures and patients were not informed of the ventilator setting. Physicians in post-anesthesia care unit who were not responsible for intraoperative care carried out the postoperative evaluation. The analysis of the postoperative chest X-ray was completed by a radiologist who was not involved in the study.
Standard procedure. All patients fasted for 12 hours before the procedure but still consumed clear water until 2 hours prior to surgery in order to avoid preoperative dehydration. Participants were premedicated with intravenous midazolam 1-2 mg 30 minutes before the surgery. In the operating room, a radical arterial cannula was inserted to monitor invasive blood pressure, collect blood gas sample, and measure the pulse pressure variation (PPV) index to guide intraoperative fluid therapy. The ASA standards for monitoring such as pulse oximeter, capnography, electrocardiography, thermometer were applied prior to the insertion of an epidural catheter at level T7-T12 for postoperative analgesia.
All patients received intravenous fentanyl 2 µg/kg, lidocaine 40 mg, propofol 2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 1 mg/kg for the induction. Intubation was performed 90 seconds after the administration of muscle relaxant and then 8 mg dexamethasone was injected. Anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane of which the concentration was justified to achieve the end-tidal concentration within the range of 1,4-1,8 in oxygen and the PRST score less than 3. If the PRST score was greater than 3, then an additional bolus dose of 20-30 mg propofol and 25-50 µg fentanyl was injected along with increasing sevoflurane concentration. On the contrary, if signs of deep anesthesia were presented (PRST score=0, blood pressure decreased by more than 20% of the baseline values, bradycardia), then the sevoflurane concentration was cut down and 100 ml of crystalloid solution was rapidly infused within 2 minutes. A bolus dose of 100-200 µg phenylephrine was added if the blood pressure was still less than 20% of the baseline value in spite of these above-mentioned steps. Rocuronium was continuously infused at the rate of 10 µg/kg/min. The solution of bupivacaine 0,1% combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml was infused via the epidural catheter at the rate of 5 ml/hour after a loading dose of 5 ml prior to skin incision. Normothermia was maintained during surgery. The pneumoperitoneum was implemented by CO2 insufflation at a pressure of 12 mmHg with room temperature in all patients. The intraoperative fluid was managed based on the goal-directed fluid therapy with a crystalloid solution. In brief, no additional fluids were provided if PPV was lower than 10%, otherwise, additional boluses of 250 ml ringer lactate solution were given over 10-15 minutes. After each bolus dose, PPV was re-assessed and further bolus was administered until reaching a PPV of lower than 10 %.
Intravenous 8 mg ondansetron was injected 30 minutes before the end of surgery to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Rocuronium infusion was stopped 30 minutes before abdominal closure. The neuromuscular blockade was reversed in the postoperative care unit using intravenous neostigmine 40-60 µg/kg combined with atropine 0,5 mg. Patients were extubated when they met the extubation criteria (spontaneous tidal volume \> 6 ml/kg and respiratory rate = 12-20 breath/minute, SpO2\>95%, normocarbia, body temperature \> 350C, positive gag reflexes and ability to follow a verbal command, hemodynamic stability without vasopressor support and ability to lift their heads and hold for 30 seconds \[23\]). Postoperative epidural analgesia for 48 hours was executed using bupivacaine 0,1% combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml at a speed of infusion 5-10 ml/hour to maintain a visual analogue scale (VAS) score \< 3. If the score was greater than 3, then a bolus dose 5 ml of the anesthetic solution was provided along with an increase in the speed of infusion. After extubation, patients were oxygenated via nasal cannula 3-5 ml/minute (1 ml/minute raises the FiO2 by 3%) to keep the SpO2\>95%.
Ventilation protocol. Mechanical ventilation protocol was performed on the anesthesia machine GE healthcare carestation 620. The patient's ideal body weight was predefined according to formula: 45.5 + 0.91×\[height(cm)-152.4\] for women or 50 + 0.91×\[height(cm)-152.4\] for men. In both groups, the mechanical ventilation was set up at the volume-controlled mode, inspiration to expiration ratio of 1:2. After being lifted to 100% in the induction period, FiO2 was maintained at the level of 40% until extubation. Respiratory rate (starting with 18 breaths/minute) was justified to keep the end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) in the normal range of 35-40 mmHg. In the CV group, the tidal volume was set at 10 ml/kg IBW without PEEP and RM. In contrast, in the LPV group, patients were provided with a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg IBW and an intraoperative 10 cmH2O in PEEP. Simultaneously, in the LPV group, alveoli were recruited applying a stepwise increase in PEEP (from 4 to 10 cmH2O for 3 breaths, 10 to 15 cmH2O for 3 breaths, and 15 to 20 cmH2O for 10 breaths) with maximum PIP = 50 cmH2O \[24\]. The recruitment maneuvers were performed right after intubation, 30 minutes after CO2 insufflation, then every hour, and finally before extubation.
Data source and collection. The demographic characteristics including age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA physical status and history of coexisting diseases, and smoking were recorded. Vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, SpO2, EtCO2, core temperature) were also recorded at 15 minutes intervals throughout the surgery. The volume of intravenous infusion (crystalloid, colloid solution), blood loss, urine output, total dose of anesthetics, fentanyl, and muscle relaxant were recorded as well. The dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was measured directly on the ventilator, while the static compliance (Cstat) was calculated in accordance with the pre-defined formula as Vt/(plateau pressure of the respiratory system - PEEP) with the plateau pressure measured during the normal ventilation setting using an inspiratory pause at 10% of the inspiratory time. Both types of pulmonary compliance were recorded at H0 (after intubation), H1 (30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum), H2 (1 hour after pneumoperitoneum), H3 (2 hours after pneumoperitoneum), Hkt (10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum stopped) and Hro (before extubation). Arterial blood samples were withdrawn from the radical arterial cannula for blood gas analysis before induction, 1 hour after pneumoperitoneum, and day 1 after operation. The pulmonary oxygenation index (OI) and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-aO2) was calculated respectively as OI= PaO2/FiO2 and A-aO2= (PB-PH2O)×FiO2 -PaCO2/R - PaO2 where PB (atmospheric pressure) was 760 mmHg, PH2O (saturated vapor pressure at room temperature) was 47 mmHg, and the R (respiration quotient) was 0.8. SpO2 in the first postoperative day was measured in the room air (the nasal oxygen catheter was removed for 10 min) with the patient in bed. If SpO2 dropped to lower than 90%, the measurement was stopped and the supplemental oxygen was immediately re-provided via the nasal cannula.
Pre- and postoperative (day 1) chest radiography was obtained at the bedside and was analyzed in a blinded way by a radiologist who did not get involved in the study. Pathological chest X-ray was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: an increase in thickness of the interstitium, atelectasis, pleural effusion, localized or diffused infiltrates, and other chest radiological alterations.
Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (mCPIS). The modified original version of the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score described by pelosi et al. (2008) was applied in the first postoperative day.
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). PPCs were defined by the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions .
Primary and secondary endpoints. Our hypothesis was that the intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategy could improve the pulmonary mechanics, oxygenation function, and ameliorate early postoperative pulmonary complications. The primary endpoints were the intraoperative fluctuation of Cdyn and Cstat, the intra- and postoperative changes in pulmonary oxygenation function including OI, A-aO2. The secondary endpoints were the alteration on chest x-ray, mCPIS, and the incidence of PPCs on the first postoperative day.
Statistical analysis. The sample size was calculated in accordance with the formula: n= (2×C)/δ2 +1 with δ=\|µ1-µ2\|/σ, where n is the sample size in each group, µ1= mean of OI in the LPV group, µ2 = mean of OI in the CV group, σ is the common standard deviation and c = 7.9 for 80% power. Based on the study of Xin Pi (2015) whose primary outcome was the OI after 2 hours of ventilation in the two groups was 382.21 ± 88.03 µg and 450.10 ± 70.29 µg respectively. Replacing µ1=382.21, µ2=450,10, σ=88,03 in the formula, n was equal to 27,5 for each group, which represented that the minimum sample size for each group was at least 28 patients.
Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM, USA) on an intention-to-treat basis. Whether variables distributed normally was tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables were compared applying either Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, depending on the characteristics of the distribution of the variable, and consequently were presented as mean ± SD or median and interquartile range (25-75%) as appropriate. As for categorical variables, the χ2 test was employed for comparison and the Fisher exact test was used for small frequencies. All the tests were two-tailed, and statistical significance was accepted at p\<0,05.
Randomization and blinding technique. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either lung-protective ventilation (LPV group) or conventional ventilation (CV group) at a ratio of 1:1. The randomization was performed using the R program with the "runif", "as.integer", "int" and "replace" functions. As a result, a list of random numbers was created in each group. The patients were numbered according to their orders of hospital registration and then were allocated into the group of their numbers. The intervention protocol was stored in sealed, opaque numbered envelopes. An anesthesiologist who did not involve in the study set the ventilator in accordance with the protocol in the envelopes. Another anesthetist who was in charge of the patient collected data during surgery. The surgeons taking part in the procedures and patients were not informed of the ventilator setting. Physicians in post-anesthesia care unit who were not responsible for intraoperative care carried out the postoperative evaluation. The analysis of the postoperative chest X-ray was completed by a radiologist who was not involved in the study.
Standard procedure. All patients fasted for 12 hours before the procedure but still consumed clear water until 2 hours prior to surgery in order to avoid preoperative dehydration. Participants were premedicated with intravenous midazolam 1-2 mg 30 minutes before the surgery. In the operating room, a radical arterial cannula was inserted to monitor invasive blood pressure, collect blood gas sample, and measure the pulse pressure variation (PPV) index to guide intraoperative fluid therapy. The ASA standards for monitoring such as pulse oximeter, capnography, electrocardiography, thermometer were applied prior to the insertion of an epidural catheter at level T7-T12 for postoperative analgesia.
All patients received intravenous fentanyl 2 µg/kg, lidocaine 40 mg, propofol 2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 1 mg/kg for the induction. Intubation was performed 90 seconds after the administration of muscle relaxant and then 8 mg dexamethasone was injected. Anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane of which the concentration was justified to achieve the end-tidal concentration within the range of 1,4-1,8 in oxygen and the PRST score less than 3. If the PRST score was greater than 3, then an additional bolus dose of 20-30 mg propofol and 25-50 µg fentanyl was injected along with increasing sevoflurane concentration. On the contrary, if signs of deep anesthesia were presented (PRST score=0, blood pressure decreased by more than 20% of the baseline values, bradycardia), then the sevoflurane concentration was cut down and 100 ml of crystalloid solution was rapidly infused within 2 minutes. A bolus dose of 100-200 µg phenylephrine was added if the blood pressure was still less than 20% of the baseline value in spite of these above-mentioned steps. Rocuronium was continuously infused at the rate of 10 µg/kg/min. The solution of bupivacaine 0,1% combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml was infused via the epidural catheter at the rate of 5 ml/hour after a loading dose of 5 ml prior to skin incision. Normothermia was maintained during surgery. The pneumoperitoneum was implemented by CO2 insufflation at a pressure of 12 mmHg with room temperature in all patients. The intraoperative fluid was managed based on the goal-directed fluid therapy with a crystalloid solution. In brief, no additional fluids were provided if PPV was lower than 10%, otherwise, additional boluses of 250 ml ringer lactate solution were given over 10-15 minutes. After each bolus dose, PPV was re-assessed and further bolus was administered until reaching a PPV of lower than 10 %.
Intravenous 8 mg ondansetron was injected 30 minutes before the end of surgery to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Rocuronium infusion was stopped 30 minutes before abdominal closure. The neuromuscular blockade was reversed in the postoperative care unit using intravenous neostigmine 40-60 µg/kg combined with atropine 0,5 mg. Patients were extubated when they met the extubation criteria (spontaneous tidal volume \> 6 ml/kg and respiratory rate = 12-20 breath/minute, SpO2\>95%, normocarbia, body temperature \> 350C, positive gag reflexes and ability to follow a verbal command, hemodynamic stability without vasopressor support and ability to lift their heads and hold for 30 seconds \[23\]). Postoperative epidural analgesia for 48 hours was executed using bupivacaine 0,1% combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml at a speed of infusion 5-10 ml/hour to maintain a visual analogue scale (VAS) score \< 3. If the score was greater than 3, then a bolus dose 5 ml of the anesthetic solution was provided along with an increase in the speed of infusion. After extubation, patients were oxygenated via nasal cannula 3-5 ml/minute (1 ml/minute raises the FiO2 by 3%) to keep the SpO2\>95%.
Ventilation protocol. Mechanical ventilation protocol was performed on the anesthesia machine GE healthcare carestation 620. The patient's ideal body weight was predefined according to formula: 45.5 + 0.91×\[height(cm)-152.4\] for women or 50 + 0.91×\[height(cm)-152.4\] for men. In both groups, the mechanical ventilation was set up at the volume-controlled mode, inspiration to expiration ratio of 1:2. After being lifted to 100% in the induction period, FiO2 was maintained at the level of 40% until extubation. Respiratory rate (starting with 18 breaths/minute) was justified to keep the end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) in the normal range of 35-40 mmHg. In the CV group, the tidal volume was set at 10 ml/kg IBW without PEEP and RM. In contrast, in the LPV group, patients were provided with a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg IBW and an intraoperative 10 cmH2O in PEEP. Simultaneously, in the LPV group, alveoli were recruited applying a stepwise increase in PEEP (from 4 to 10 cmH2O for 3 breaths, 10 to 15 cmH2O for 3 breaths, and 15 to 20 cmH2O for 10 breaths) with maximum PIP = 50 cmH2O \[24\]. The recruitment maneuvers were performed right after intubation, 30 minutes after CO2 insufflation, then every hour, and finally before extubation.
Data source and collection. The demographic characteristics including age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA physical status and history of coexisting diseases, and smoking were recorded. Vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, SpO2, EtCO2, core temperature) were also recorded at 15 minutes intervals throughout the surgery. The volume of intravenous infusion (crystalloid, colloid solution), blood loss, urine output, total dose of anesthetics, fentanyl, and muscle relaxant were recorded as well. The dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was measured directly on the ventilator, while the static compliance (Cstat) was calculated in accordance with the pre-defined formula as Vt/(plateau pressure of the respiratory system - PEEP) with the plateau pressure measured during the normal ventilation setting using an inspiratory pause at 10% of the inspiratory time. Both types of pulmonary compliance were recorded at H0 (after intubation), H1 (30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum), H2 (1 hour after pneumoperitoneum), H3 (2 hours after pneumoperitoneum), Hkt (10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum stopped) and Hro (before extubation). Arterial blood samples were withdrawn from the radical arterial cannula for blood gas analysis before induction, 1 hour after pneumoperitoneum, and day 1 after operation. The pulmonary oxygenation index (OI) and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-aO2) was calculated respectively as OI= PaO2/FiO2 and A-aO2= (PB-PH2O)×FiO2 -PaCO2/R - PaO2 where PB (atmospheric pressure) was 760 mmHg, PH2O (saturated vapor pressure at room temperature) was 47 mmHg, and the R (respiration quotient) was 0.8. SpO2 in the first postoperative day was measured in the room air (the nasal oxygen catheter was removed for 10 min) with the patient in bed. If SpO2 dropped to lower than 90%, the measurement was stopped and the supplemental oxygen was immediately re-provided via the nasal cannula.
Pre- and postoperative (day 1) chest radiography was obtained at the bedside and was analyzed in a blinded way by a radiologist who did not get involved in the study. Pathological chest X-ray was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: an increase in thickness of the interstitium, atelectasis, pleural effusion, localized or diffused infiltrates, and other chest radiological alterations.
Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (mCPIS). The modified original version of the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score described by pelosi et al. (2008) was applied in the first postoperative day.
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). PPCs were defined by the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions .
Primary and secondary endpoints. Our hypothesis was that the intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategy could improve the pulmonary mechanics, oxygenation function, and ameliorate early postoperative pulmonary complications. The primary endpoints were the intraoperative fluctuation of Cdyn and Cstat, the intra- and postoperative changes in pulmonary oxygenation function including OI, A-aO2. The secondary endpoints were the alteration on chest x-ray, mCPIS, and the incidence of PPCs on the first postoperative day.
Statistical analysis. The sample size was calculated in accordance with the formula: n= (2×C)/δ2 +1 with δ=\|µ1-µ2\|/σ, where n is the sample size in each group, µ1= mean of OI in the LPV group, µ2 = mean of OI in the CV group, σ is the common standard deviation and c = 7.9 for 80% power. Based on the study of Xin Pi (2015) whose primary outcome was the OI after 2 hours of ventilation in the two groups was 382.21 ± 88.03 µg and 450.10 ± 70.29 µg respectively. Replacing µ1=382.21, µ2=450,10, σ=88,03 in the formula, n was equal to 27,5 for each group, which represented that the minimum sample size for each group was at least 28 patients.
Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM, USA) on an intention-to-treat basis. Whether variables distributed normally was tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables were compared applying either Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, depending on the characteristics of the distribution of the variable, and consequently were presented as mean ± SD or median and interquartile range (25-75%) as appropriate. As for categorical variables, the χ2 test was employed for comparison and the Fisher exact test was used for small frequencies. All the tests were two-tailed, and statistical significance was accepted at p\<0,05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Mechanical Ventilation Complication
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either lung-protective ventilation (LPV group) or conventional ventilation (CV group) at a ratio of 1:1.
Primary Study Purpose
PREVENTION
Blinding Strategy
TRIPLE
Participants
Investigators
Outcome Assessors
An anesthesiologist who did not involve in the study set the ventilator in accordance with the protocol in the envelopes. Another anesthetist who was in charge of the patient collected data during surgery. The surgeons taking part in the procedures and patients were not informed of the ventilator setting. Physicians in post-anesthesia care unit who were not responsible for intraoperative care carried out the postoperative evaluation. The analysis of the postoperative chest X-ray was completed by a radiologist who was not involved in the study.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lung-protective mechanical ventilation
Vt=7 ml/kg IBW; an intraoperative 10 cmH2O in PEEP, recruitment maneuvers applying a stepwise increase in PEEP.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Lung-protective mechanical ventilation
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Patients were provided with a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg IBW and an intraoperative 10 cmH2O in PEEP. Simultaneously, the alveoli were recruited applying a stepwise increase in PEEP (from 4 to 10 cmH2O for 3 breaths, 10 to 15 cmH2O for 3 breaths, and 15 to 20 cmH2O for 10 breaths) with maximum PIP = 50 cmH2O \[24\]. The recruitment maneuvers were performed right after intubation, 30 minutes after CO2 insufflation, then every hour, and finally before extubation.
Conventional mechanical ventilation
the tidal volume was set at 10 ml/kg IBW without PEEP and (recruitment maneuvers) RM
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lung-protective mechanical ventilation
Patients were provided with a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg IBW and an intraoperative 10 cmH2O in PEEP. Simultaneously, the alveoli were recruited applying a stepwise increase in PEEP (from 4 to 10 cmH2O for 3 breaths, 10 to 15 cmH2O for 3 breaths, and 15 to 20 cmH2O for 10 breaths) with maximum PIP = 50 cmH2O \[24\]. The recruitment maneuvers were performed right after intubation, 30 minutes after CO2 insufflation, then every hour, and finally before extubation.
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Elective abdominal laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia with an expected duration of greater than 2 hours.
* Age more than 18 years.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
* A body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2.
* Age more than 18 years.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
* A body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2.
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals who refused to participate in the study.
* Patients with preexisting cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities (for instance heart failure, intractable shock, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, pulmonary infection, bronchiectasis, pulmonary metastases ).
* Any preexisting abnormalities on chest X-ray or spirometry.
* Neuromuscular disease.
* Liver cirrhosis (Child B or C).
* Chronic renal failure with dialysis.
* A need for prolonged mechanical ventilation after surgery.
* Patients with preexisting cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities (for instance heart failure, intractable shock, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, pulmonary infection, bronchiectasis, pulmonary metastases ).
* Any preexisting abnormalities on chest X-ray or spirometry.
* Neuromuscular disease.
* Liver cirrhosis (Child B or C).
* Chronic renal failure with dialysis.
* A need for prolonged mechanical ventilation after surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vietnam National Cancer Hospital
INDIV
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Vietnam Military Medical University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nguyen Trung Kien
Head of Center of Emergency, Critical Care Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Military Hospital 103
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kien T Nguyen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Critical Care Medicine and ClinicalToxicology, Military Hospital 103
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital
Hanoi, Ha Dong District, Vietnam
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Vietnam
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pi X, Cui Y, Wang C, Guo L, Sun B, Shi J, Lin Z, Zhao N, Wang W, Fu S, Li E. Low tidal volume with PEEP and recruitment expedite the recovery of pulmonary function. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Nov 1;8(11):14305-14. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
RESULT
Severgnini P, Selmo G, Lanza C, Chiesa A, Frigerio A, Bacuzzi A, Dionigi G, Novario R, Gregoretti C, de Abreu MG, Schultz MJ, Jaber S, Futier E, Chiaranda M, Pelosi P. Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1307-21. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829102de.
Reference Type
RESULT
Liu J, Meng Z, Lv R, Zhang Y, Wang G, Xie J. Effect of intraoperative lung-protective mechanical ventilation on pulmonary oxygenation function and postoperative pulmonary complications after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(6):e8523. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20198523. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
Reference Type
RESULT
Sprung J, Whalen FX, Comfere T, Bosnjak ZJ, Bajzer Z, Gajic O, Sarr MG, Schroeder DR, Liedl LM, Offord CP, Warner DO. Alveolar recruitment and arterial desflurane concentration during bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):120-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818db6c7.
Reference Type
RESULT
Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.
Reference Type
RESULT
Futier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, Jung B, Kwiatkowski F, Duclos M, Jaber S, Bazin JE. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves end-expiratory lung volume but not oxygenation after induction of anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):508-13. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283398806.
Reference Type
RESULT
Hazebroek EJ, Haitsma JJ, Lachmann B, Bonjer HJ. Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure preserves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 2002 Apr;16(4):685-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8174-y. Epub 2001 Dec 31.
Reference Type
RESULT
Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, Kendrick ML, Que FL, Williams BA, Joyner MJ, Hubmayr RD, Warner DO, Sprung J. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):298-305. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a.
Reference Type
RESULT
Haliloglu M, Bilgili B, Ozdemir M, Umuroglu T, Bakan N. Low Tidal Volume Positive End-Expiratory Pressure versus High Tidal Volume Zero-Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Functions in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(6):573-578. doi: 10.1159/000484693. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Reference Type
RESULT
Pelosi P, Barassi A, Severgnini P, Gomiero B, Finazzi S, Merlini G, d'Eril GM, Chiaranda M, Niederman MS. Prognostic role of clinical and laboratory criteria to identify early ventilator-associated pneumonia in brain injury. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):101-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2546. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
Reference Type
RESULT
Nguyen TK, Nguyen VL, Nguyen TG, Mai DH, Nguyen NQ, Vu TA, Le AN, Nguyen QH, Nguyen CT, Nguyen DT. Lung-protective mechanical ventilation for patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01318-5.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VMMU20193
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
The Effect of Pressure-controlled Ventilation on the Respiratory Complication in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy Compared With Volume-controlled Ventilation
NCT02039466
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
Optimization of PEEP During Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT05222893
COMPLETED
NA
Ventilation Strategies Impact on Oxygenation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Lung Surgery Patients
NCT06805760
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Effect of Low Tidal Ventilation on Intraoperative Bleeding in Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy
NCT05490147
UNKNOWN
NA
A Comparative Study of Ventilation Strategies in Different Surgical Positions on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Blood Flow During Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT06805747
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
a Study Conducted About a New Mode of Ventilation in Laparoscopic Surgeries
NCT03637530
UNKNOWN
NA
Investigation of the Optimum PEEP Mechanical Power Relationship
NCT06625099
COMPLETED
Intraoperative Protective Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
NCT02671721
COMPLETED
NA
The Role of Periodic Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers in Intraoperative Protective Ventilation
NCT05962125
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison Volume-controlled Ventilation, Pressure-controlled Volume-guaranteed Ventilation, and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery in the Steep Trendelenburg Position
NCT06861959
COMPLETED
NA
Ventilator-driven Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver
NCT04258202
COMPLETED
NA
Prevention of Postoperative Respiratory Complications
NCT06899295
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Low Tidal Volume for Lung Protection During Anesthesia of Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendlenburg Position
NCT02553057
UNKNOWN
NA
Effect of Intraoperative PEEP Individualization According to Driving Pressure in Major Abdominal Surgery
NCT05781373
UNKNOWN
NA
Intraoperative Protective Ventilation in Abdominal Surgery (IMPROVE Study)
NCT01282996
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Driving Pressure-guided PEEP Titration in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgeries
NCT04327193
COMPLETED
NA
Volume-Controlled Ventilation and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation Volume Guaranteed in Obese Patients in Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery
NCT06117748
RECRUITING
NA
Assessment of Respiratory Drive and Inspiratory Effort Across Pressure Support Levels in Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery
NCT07199881
RECRUITING
NA
Individualized Perioperative Open Lung Ventilatory Strategy
NCT02158923
COMPLETED
NA
Pressure-controlled vs Volume Controlled Ventilation on RV Function During OLV
NCT01763879
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Intra-Operative Modified Ventilator Mechanical Power in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries
NCT07065370
COMPLETED
NA
The Effect of Intraoperative Ventilation Mode on Hemodynamics and Lung Dynamics
NCT05776589
UNKNOWN
Respiratory Mechanics During One-lung Ventilation
NCT04519606
COMPLETED
Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients
NCT06517550
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison Between Volume Controlled Ventilation and Pressure Controlled Ventilation
NCT00224653
COMPLETED
NA