Investigation of the Optimum PEEP Mechanical Power Relationship

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-12

Study Completion Date

2025-10-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of standard and optimum positive end expiratory pressures on mechanical power during laparoscopic surgeries.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Pressure Controlled Ventilation Versus Volume Controlled Ventilation in Upper Abdominal Surgery

NCT05690867

Ventilator Lung

COMPLETED NA

The Effect of Intraoperative Ventilation Mode on Hemodynamics and Lung Dynamics

NCT05776589

Mechanical Ventilation

UNKNOWN

Comparison Volume-controlled Ventilation, Pressure-controlled Volume-guaranteed Ventilation, and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery in the Steep Trendelenburg Position

NCT06861959

Mechanical Ventilation Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery Peak Inspiratuar Pressure

COMPLETED NA

The Effects of VC Versus PC Ventilation on Cerebral and Respiratory Parameters in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery

NCT06482983

Anesthesia Gynecologic Cancer Mechanical Ventilation Complication

RECRUITING NA

Role of Individualized PEEP Vs Fixed PEEP in Mechanical Ventilation During Laparoscopic Surgeries

NCT06929078

Laparoscopic Surgery Pneumoperitoneum Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP)

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Perioperative pulmonary complications and ventilator-associated lung injury are challenging issues for anesthesiologists, especially after laparoscopic surgeries. An increasing number of studies suggest lung protective ventilation (LPV) strategies in these patients. It is recommended that patients\&; driving pressure be kept low during LPV and positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) be applied to keep the lungs open. However, high PEEP values cannot be adequately applied in laparoscopic surgeries to reduce the restrictive peak pressure for LPV. In laparoscopic surgeries, the patients position and increased intra-abdominal pressure create pressure on the lungs. However, when the applied positive pressure ventilation is insufficient in patients, it can cause atelectasis, and when it is excessive, it can cause barotrauma or volutrauma. The threshold values determined for all these possible complications during LPV should be evaluated together.

Gattinoni and colleagues (2016) explained the effect of mechanical ventilation on the lungs through a work/time formula and formulated the energy used during this work. The applied energy is spent on opening the lungs and ventilation, while the excess is consumed due to heat and resistance in the respiratory tract. The unit of this energy can be formulated in a simplified way as joule/second. The mechanical power formula makes it easier to follow by providing a single parameter instead of different threshold values for barotrauma, volutrauma and atelectrauma for the lungs. Studies have shown that applying energy over 12.6 joules is associated with lung damage. On the other hand, the relationship between the optimum mechanical power (MP) value during ventilation and low and high PEEP is not yet fully known.

In laparoscopic surgeries, high PEEP application may help keep the lungs open and increase ventilation, but it may cause higher mechanical power application. In this case, the effect of high PEEP application on ventilation and patient outcomes is unclear.

In this study, PEEP values and mechanical power values applied during ventilation in patients who will be operated under laparoscopic surgery will be monitored observationally and the PEEP/MP relationship will be examined in terms of patient oxygenation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation Mechanical Power Optimum PEEP Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group L

After the study group patients were informed preoperatively and accepted to participate in the study, different mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied to the randomly grouped patients after standard propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium midazolam induction anesthesia according to the groups they are in. Group L patients will be applied standard 5 cmH2O PEEP after anesthesia induction.

The ventilation parameters and vital signs obtained will be recorded, and the mechanical power applied to the patients will be calculated according to Gattinoni's mechanical power calculation formula in volume controlled patients. The groups will be compared for power hemodynamic values and blood gas for oxygenation.

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Low PEEP

Intervention Type OTHER

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Low PEEP During volume controlled ventilation, blood gas values and mechanical power calculations of patients ventilated at 6-8ml/kg tidal volume and 5cmH2o PEEP, I/E: 1/2, 10-14 frequency ranges will be recorded.

Group O

After the study group patients are informed preoperatively and accepted to participate in the study, different mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied to the patients randomly grouped after standard propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium midazolam induction anesthesia according to their groups. Optimum PEEP will be applied to Group O patients after anesthesia induction, with the highest compliance values.

The ventilation parameters and vital signs obtained will be recorded and the mechanical power applied to the patients will be calculated according to Gattinoni's mechanical power calculation formula in volume-controlled patients. The groups will be compared in terms of power hemodynamic values and blood gas for oxygenation.

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Optimum PEEP

Intervention Type OTHER

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Low PEEP During volume controlled ventilation, blood gas values and mechanical power calculations of patients ventilated at 6-8ml/kg tidal volume and optimum PEEP, I/E: 1/2, 10-14 frequency ranges will be recorded.

The optimum PEEP will be adjusted by titrating to the highest compliance with the open lung strategy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Low PEEP

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Low PEEP During volume controlled ventilation, blood gas values and mechanical power calculations of patients ventilated at 6-8ml/kg tidal volume and 5cmH2o PEEP, I/E: 1/2, 10-14 frequency ranges will be recorded.

Intervention Type OTHER

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Optimum PEEP

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) with Low PEEP During volume controlled ventilation, blood gas values and mechanical power calculations of patients ventilated at 6-8ml/kg tidal volume and optimum PEEP, I/E: 1/2, 10-14 frequency ranges will be recorded.

The optimum PEEP will be adjusted by titrating to the highest compliance with the open lung strategy.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* within the appropriate age range
* agreeing to participate in the study
* again receiving lancetesthesia
* volume controlled ventilation
* no known lung disease
* no known coronary artery disease
* ASA class 1-2 patients

Exclusion Criteria

* . Patients who do not want to be included in the study will not be included
* Patients with intraoperative deep hypotension (mean arterial pressure \<50) will be excluded.
* Those who develop intraoperative hypothermia or have other anesthesia complications will be excluded.
* Patients who will not be extubated postoperatively will be excluded from the study.
* Those with neurological diseases or those using psychiatric medications will also be excluded from the study.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No