Comparison of Volume Controlled Ventilation With 1:1 Inspiratory to Expiratory Ratio and Autoflow-volume Controlled Ventilation in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With Steep Trendelenburg Position and Pneumoperitoneum
NCT ID: NCT03202953
Last Updated: 2018-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-04
2018-01-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Volume Controlled Ventilation and Autoflow-volume Controlled Ventilation in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With Steep Trendelenburg Position and Pneumoperitoneum
NCT02803424
Volume Controlled Ventilation vs Autoflow-volume Controlled Ventilation
NCT02512120
The Effect of Prolonged Inspiratory Time on Gas Exchange During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery With Steep Trendelenburg Position : A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02966535
Individual Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT04085146
Comparison of Different Inspiratory to Expiratory Ratios on Respiratory Mechanics and Oxygenation in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With Steep Trendelenburg Position and Pneumoperitoneum
NCT01892449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
2. autoflow VCV group
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1:1 I:E ratio VCV (Group I)
volume controlled ventilation with 1:1 inspiratory to expiratory ratio After trendelenburg position, Tidal volume : 8ml/kg, inspiration:expiration ratio = 1:1, FiO2 = 0.5, maintain end tidal CO2 around 40±5 mmHg. Positive end expiratory pressure will not used.
ventilation strategy 1
In Group I, after trendelenburg position, patients will be applied 1:1 ratio VCV.
* Tidal volume : 8ml/kg, inspiration:expiration ratio = 1:1, FiO2 = 0.5, maintain end tidal CO2 around 40±5 mmHg. Positive end expiratory pressure will not used.
autoflow VCV (Group A)
autoflow volume-controlled ventilation After trendelenburg position, Tidal volume : 8ml/kg, inspiration:expiration ratio = 1:2, FiO2 = 0.5, maintain end tidal CO2 around 40±5 mmHg. Positive end expiratory pressure will not used.
ventilation strategy 2
In group A, after trendelenburg position, patients will be applied autoflow VCV.
\- Tidal volume : 8ml/kg, inspiration:expiration ratio = 1:2, FiO2 = 0.5, maintain end tidal CO2 around 40±5 mmHg. Positive end expiratory pressure will not used.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ventilation strategy 1
In Group I, after trendelenburg position, patients will be applied 1:1 ratio VCV.
* Tidal volume : 8ml/kg, inspiration:expiration ratio = 1:1, FiO2 = 0.5, maintain end tidal CO2 around 40±5 mmHg. Positive end expiratory pressure will not used.
ventilation strategy 2
In group A, after trendelenburg position, patients will be applied autoflow VCV.
\- Tidal volume : 8ml/kg, inspiration:expiration ratio = 1:2, FiO2 = 0.5, maintain end tidal CO2 around 40±5 mmHg. Positive end expiratory pressure will not used.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
Exclusion Criteria
2. decreased heart function (EF \<50%)
3. BMI\>30
4. patients who cannot read the consent form (e.g., blind, foreigner)
20 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2017-0400
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.