Individualized PEEP and Driving Pressure Ventilation on Postoperative Lung Complications in Robot Prostatectomy Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06909630

Last Updated: 2025-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-06

Study Completion Date

2024-06-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the case of robotic prostate cancer surgery under general anesthesia, the surgical posture is extreme Trendelenburg. Therefore, airway pressure is very high during mechanical ventilation, and there is a possibility of postoperative pulmonary complications. In order to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications, we tried to apply end-tidal pressure suitable for each individual to set the most tidal volume that can reduce the burden on the lungs during the perioperative period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is conducted on patients who are scheduled for prostate surgery under general anesthesia with robot assistance. Subjects who consented to the consent form the day before the surgery were conducted with people aged 19 years or older who belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II. In the drive group, the ventilator setting is fixed at tidal volume 6-8ml/kg and respiratory rate 15 breathes/min, and then the recruitment maneuver (RM, alveolar recruitment) is performed within the range that does not cause hemodynamic instability. After that, the PEEP is gradually raised from 5 cmH2O to 20 cmH2O. Driving pressure finds the lowest value. If there is no significant change even when the pressure change raises the PEEP, select the lowest PEEP. In the control group, PEEP is maintained in 5 cmH2O until the end of surgery. The primary outcome of the study is to confirm the presence or absence of postoperative pulmonary complications using Chest X-rays, vital signs, and blood tests. It is the individualized PEEP value as a secondary outcome. The related driving pressure and compliance will also be observed. In addition, anesthesia/surgical time, use of vasopressors, amount of blood loss, amount of fluid, and amount of urine will be measured.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Collapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

In the drive group, the ventilator setting is fixed at tidal volume 6-8ml/kg and respiratory rate 15 breathes/min, and then the recruitment maneuver (RM, alveolar recruitment) is performed within the range that does not cause hemodynamic instability. After that, the PEEP is gradually raised from 5 cmH2O to 20 cmH2O. Driving pressure finds the lowest value. If there is no significant change even when the pressure change raises the PEEP, select the lowest PEEP. In the control group, PEEP is maintained in 5 cmH2O until the end of surgery.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Because a table of random numbers is used, participants do not know which group they belong to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

PEEP is maintained in 5 cmH2O until the end of surgery.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Driving pressure group

Individual PEEP is applied according to the driving pressure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Driving pressure group

Intervention Type OTHER

individual PEEP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Driving pressure group

individual PEEP

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* elective RALP surgery under genenal anesthesia
* ASA 1-2
* 19 years of age or older
* Consented to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Do not consent to participate in the study
* ≥ BMI 40 kg/m2
* Moderate or severe obstructive/restrictive pulmonary disease on pulmonary function tests
* Preoperative serious cardiovascular disease
* Required postoperative ventilator care at ICU care
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yu kyung Bae

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

SNUBH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SNUBH

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B-2202-737-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.