Effect of Age on the Median Effective Dose(ED50) for Motor Block With Intrathecal Ropivacaine

NCT ID: NCT02102607

Last Updated: 2015-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary aim of this study was to determine the median effective dose (ED50) for motor block of intrathecally-administered ropivacaine in adults (20-80 years), and to assess the effect of age on ED50 required for motor block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was performed in adult patients undergoing transurethral, urological or lower limb surgery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Patients were stratified according to age: 20-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, and 71-80 years. The spinal component of the anesthetic was established by bolus administration of various up-and-down doses of 0.75% ropivacaine, determined by Dixon's method, with the first patient receiving 15 mg, and with testing intervals of 1.5 mg according to failure or success of the preceding patient's motor block. The degree of motor block after intrathecal administration of each dose was evaluated by the modified Bromage and Hip motor function score. The primary outcome was obtained by administration of the mean dosage that was determined from the midpoints of all independent pairs of patients involving a crossover from failure to success during 5 minutes after the spinal injection. The ED50 were estimated from the up-and-down sequences using the method of Dixon and Massey and logistic regression. Other endpoints were included on the basis of sensory block level, duration of motor blockade, hypotension, and vasopressor requirements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

age

subjects stratified according to age: 20-30 years (Group 1), 31-40 years (Group 2), 41-50 years (Group 3), 51-60 years (Group 4), 61-70 years (Group 5), and 71-80 years (Group 6).

age

Intervention Type OTHER

subjects stratified according to age: 20-30 years (Group 1), 31-40 years (Group 2), 41-50 years (Group 3), 51-60 years (Group 4), 61-70 years (Group 5), and 71-80 years (Group 6).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

age

subjects stratified according to age: 20-30 years (Group 1), 31-40 years (Group 2), 41-50 years (Group 3), 51-60 years (Group 4), 61-70 years (Group 5), and 71-80 years (Group 6).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients who were undergoing transurethral, urological or lower limb surgery, primarily under the spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with diabetes, obesity, neuromuscular diseases, bleeding diathesis, hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics, lumbar vertebrae abnormality, chronic back pain, or who were pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mingquan Chen

the First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University (China)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

jun yang, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

China Three Gorges University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

China Three Gorges University

Yichang, Hubei, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lee YY, Ngan Kee WD, Fong SY, Liu JT, Gin T. The median effective dose of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine after intrathecal injection in lower limb surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1331-4. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b1912b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19762766 (View on PubMed)

Gupta R, Bogra J, Singh PK, Saxena S, Chandra G, Kushwaha JK. Comparative study of intrathecal hyperbaric versus isobaric ropivacaine: A randomized control trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;7(3):249-53. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.115326.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24015125 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

China Three Gorges University

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

intrathecal ropivacaine

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.