Isobaric Spinal Ropivacaine Versus Hyperbaric Spinal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients

NCT ID: NCT02764723

Last Updated: 2016-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia with isobaric ropivacaine, compared with hyperbaric bupivacaine in geriatric patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

52 patients physical status II-III according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification aged 65 years and above of average height, and scheduled for total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia.

Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups of 26 patients each according to the type of local anesthetic injected in the subarachnoid space , Group I : patients who received an intrathecal injection of 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine , Group II: patients who received an intrathecal injection of 15 mg of 0.5% ropivacaine.

The investigators compared both groups as regards the extent and duration of sensory and motor block and hemodynamics including heart rate (HR) , non invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and respiratory depression.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients Spinal Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hyperbaric bupivacaine

12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hyperbaric bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

12.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Isobaric ropivacaine

15 mg of 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Isobaric ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

15 mg of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hyperbaric bupivacaine

12.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type DRUG

Isobaric ropivacaine

15 mg of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III aged 65 years and above of average height, and scheduled for total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics and contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Abbas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Abbas

Doctor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

D'Souza AD, Saldanha NM, Monteiro AD. Comparison of Intrathecal Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine, Isobaric 0.5% Levobupivacaine and Isobaric 0.75% Ropivacaine for Lower Abdominal Surgeries. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research (IJHSR). 2014;4(1):22-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MSAT-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hypobaric L5-S1 Study
NCT06526156 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING