Effects of Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine on Cerebral Oxygenation During Intrathecal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

NCT ID: NCT01960543

Last Updated: 2015-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Elderly patients with hip fracture are frail due to associated comorbidity. In these situations, regional anesthesia is recommended as it is associated to less postoperative cognitive dysfunction. However, hypotension during the process may impair ischemic cardiopathy and induce a cerebrovascular stroke. Selection of the right anesthetic agent and the administration of vasoactive drugs during the process can minimize these risks. Although bupivacaine and levobupivacaine share pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, the studies show conflicting results. The aim of this study is to investigate if there are clinically relevant differences between these two drugs in terms of hemodynamic parameters during the surgical process with special focus on the effects on regional cerebral oximetry and cognitive status after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complication of Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine

Intrathecal administration of bupivacaine 0.5%

Doses:

Bupivacaine 7 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients shorter than 160 cm. Bupivacaine 9 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients equal or taller than 160 cm or hip replacement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

fentanyl 15 microg

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine 7 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine 9 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Levobupivacaine

Intrathecal administration of levobupivacaine 0.5%:

Doses:

Levobupivacaine 7 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients shorter than 160 cm. Levobupivacaine 9 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients equal or taller than 160 cm or hip replacement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

fentanyl 15 microg

Intervention Type DRUG

Levobupivacaine 7 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Levobupivacaine 9 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fentanyl 15 microg

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine 7 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine 9 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Levobupivacaine 7 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Levobupivacaine 9 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients older than 70 years old who undergo major surgery for hip fracture and will receive intrathecal anesthesia
2. Patients in which it is considered adequate, according to the usual clinical practice, the use of bupivacaine or levobupivacaine as part of the intrathecal anesthesia
3. Patients who give their informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients allergic to anesthetic drugs to be used in the protocol or to local anesthetics amida type.
2. Patients with severe aortic stenosis or hemodynamic instability.
3. Patients who refuse the anesthetic technique or contraindication for the use of the intrathecal technique.
4. Patients with severe cognitive impairment previous to the intervention (defined by a score in the Pfeiffer test of 8-10 errors)
5. Patients in which the use of bupivacaine or levobupivacaine is contraindicated as part of the intrathecal anesthesia
6. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could pose a risk to the patient
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Corporacion Parc Tauli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Diana L Fernandez Galinski

Physician - Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Sabadell

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vives R, Fernandez-Galinski D, Gordo F, Izquierdo A, Oliva JC, Colilles C, Pontes C. Effects of bupivacaine or levobupivacaine on cerebral oxygenation during spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery for hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0682-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30704463 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANE-INTRA-2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.