Continuous Spinal Anesthesia With Hypobaric Bupivacaine to Preserve Hemodynamics in Elderly
NCT ID: NCT02428257
Last Updated: 2015-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fractional Spinal Anesthesia and Systemic Hemodynamics in Frail Elderly Hip Fracture Patients.
NCT05101291
Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Hypobaric and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients
NCT06972485
Hemodynamic Safety of Levobupivacaine vs Bupivacaine in Patients Over 65 Years Undergoing Hip Surgery
NCT03843970
Effects of Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine on Cerebral Oxygenation During Intrathecal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT01960543
Comparison of Phenylephrine and Ephedrine in the Treatment of Hemodynamic Disorders After Spinal Anesthesia in the Elderly
NCT03858465
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Unilateral spinal anesthesia may be achieved by hypobaric bupivacaine when patients are in the lateral position. Unilateral spinal anesthesia is more effective in preserving hemodynamics by limiting the spread of the sympathetic blockade to the operated side.
Our goal is to show that the use of hypobaric rather than isobaric bupivacaine in continuous spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture reduces incidence of hypotension.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
hypobaric
continuous spinal anesthesia with 2,5 mg boluses of hypobaric bupivacaine, prepared diluting each 1 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with 1 ml of sterile water.
continuous spinal anesthesia
Spinal puncture performed with a 19-gauge Tuohy needle at the L4-L5 or L3-L4 interspace using a midline approach. 3 cm of a 22-gauge catheter introduced through the needle, directed to the fractured side.
hypobaric bupivacaine
hypobaric bupivacaine was prepared diluting each 1 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with 1 ml of sterile water.
ephedrine
isobaric
continuous spinal anesthesia with 2,5 mg boluses of 0.5% isboaric bupivacaine
continuous spinal anesthesia
Spinal puncture performed with a 19-gauge Tuohy needle at the L4-L5 or L3-L4 interspace using a midline approach. 3 cm of a 22-gauge catheter introduced through the needle, directed to the fractured side.
isobaric bupivacaine
0.5% isobaric bupivacaine
ephedrine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
continuous spinal anesthesia
Spinal puncture performed with a 19-gauge Tuohy needle at the L4-L5 or L3-L4 interspace using a midline approach. 3 cm of a 22-gauge catheter introduced through the needle, directed to the fractured side.
hypobaric bupivacaine
hypobaric bupivacaine was prepared diluting each 1 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with 1 ml of sterile water.
isobaric bupivacaine
0.5% isobaric bupivacaine
ephedrine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* dementia.
* consent refusal.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Kassab d'Orthopédie
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Kassab d'Orthopédie
Manouba, La Manouba, Tunisia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Neuman MD, Rosenbaum PR, Ludwig JM, Zubizarreta JR, Silber JH. Anesthesia technique, mortality, and length of stay after hip fracture surgery. JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2508-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6499.
Patorno E, Neuman MD, Schneeweiss S, Mogun H, Bateman BT. Comparative safety of anesthetic type for hip fracture surgery in adults: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Jun 27;348:g4022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4022.
Minville V, Fourcade O, Grousset D, Chassery C, Nguyen L, Asehnoune K, Colombani A, Goulmamine L, Samii K. Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1559-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000218421.18723.cf.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P-2015008AR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.