Spinal Anaesthesia With Levobupivacaine 0.5% and Ropivacaine 0.75% for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02201784
Last Updated: 2015-01-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Levobupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Epidural Anaesthesia
NCT02513433
Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Limb Surgery
NCT00358280
Local Infiltration Analgesia in Major Spine Surgery With Ropivacaine Versus Placebo
NCT00771459
A Randomised Comparison on the Dose Requirement Between, Levobupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Intrathecal Anaesthesia
NCT00636974
Clinical Characteristics of Spinal Levobupivacaine: Hyperbaric Compared With Isobaric Solution
NCT01349751
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Levobupivacaine 0.5%
intrathecal administration of 15 mg of Levobupivacaine 0.5%
Levobupivacaine
Comparison of Equipotent doses
Ropivacaine 0.75%
intrathecal administration of 22.5 mg of Ropivacaine 0.75%
Ropivacaine
Comparison of equipotent doses
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Levobupivacaine
Comparison of Equipotent doses
Ropivacaine
Comparison of equipotent doses
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age between 18-60 years
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have contraindications to spinal anaesthesia / Local anaesthetic drugs.
3. Patients having h/o diabetes, neurological and musculoskeletal diseases.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aligarh Muslim University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
MANAZIR ATHAR
Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Manazir Athar, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU,Aligarh, India
Syed Moied Ahmed, PhD, M.D
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India
Masood H Siddiqi, M.S
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jawaharlal Nehru medical college, AMU
Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
jnmch2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.