Erector Spine Block for Back Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03214536

Last Updated: 2018-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-25

Study Completion Date

2017-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In spine surgery postoperative pain can often be severe and difficult to treat.With the use of ultrasound, the performance of plane blocks and other techniques like root blocks, facet infiltration have become possible without the use of either unreliable " pop-techniques" or the use of x-ray.The erector spinae block was recently described as a safe and simple and safe technique for neuropathic pain and acute post surgical pain, with effect on the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves and with promising results. In this observational pilot study we want to test the influence of these to blocks on the postoperative pain and opioid consumption after spine fusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In 10-15 patients undergoing back surgery (laminectomy or back surgery with lumbar pedicle screw placement or revision back surgery), will be asked to give informed consent to receive a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block before surgery. In this population it will be clear after 10-15 patients if there is a beneficial effect since these patients normally require a substantial amount of postoperative opioids because of significant postoperative pain.

The blocks will be performed by experts in the field of ultrasound guided locoregional anaesthesia in a separate block room with ultrasound after placement of an iv line and application of standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, saturation)

Description of block performance according to Chinn et al but at a lumbar level:

The patient will be placed in the lateral or sitting position. With a curve array probe or a high frequency linear probe, depending on the BMI of the patient, will be placed in a longitudinal position 2-3 cm lateral of the vertebral column. The transverse processes of the vertebrae at the (mid) level of surgery, the erector spinae muscle and the psoas muscle are identified. Depending on the depth a 5 or 8 cm 22 G ultrasound needle (pajunk) will be inserted in an in plane technique in a cephalad to caudad direction until bone contact with the top of the transverse process is reached. After slight retraction of the needle, 20 ml of ropivacaine 0,375% will be injected behind the erector spinae muscle. The same procedure will be repeated on the contralateral side.

Sensory loss of the posterior dermatomes and dermatomes of the anterior roots of the spinal nerves (lumbar plexus, upper leg) will be tested Motor function of the legs will be evaluated with a Bromage (0-3) score.

General anaesthesia will then be induced in a standardized way with propofol, sufentanyl and rocuronium. The maintenance of anaesthesia and the procedure will be performed according to protocol.

After surgery analgesia will be provided with nsaid when applicable and 1000 mg paracetamol IV 4 times daily combined with a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump depending on the site:

* AZ klina protocol: PCA piritramide/dhbp pump: 0ml/h, 2 mg bolus, 20 minutes lockout
* UZA protocol: Morphine/dhbp pump: 0ml/h 1 mg bolus, 8minutes lock out) and Pain scores (NRS, 0=no pain 10= worst pain ever), will be tested on the post anesthesia care unit every hour and according to hospital postoperative protocol at the ward during the fist 24 hours.

The amount and frequency of the opioid usage of the first 24 hours will be extracted out of the PCA pump. In patients without a block, opioid consumption is mostly expected between 25-40 mg morphine/24h (loading dose excluded) according to weight. We expect to see a substantial decrease (at least 50 %) in opioid consumption.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spine Disease Regional Anaesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

observational feasibility trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

erector spinae block

bilateral erector spine block with 20 ml 0,375% ropivacaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

erector spinae block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bilateral injection of local anaesthetic between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

injection of 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375 % bilateral by erector spinae block

Spine surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery of lumbar spine

anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

general anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

erector spinae block

bilateral injection of local anaesthetic between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ropivacaine

injection of 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375 % bilateral by erector spinae block

Intervention Type DRUG

Spine surgery

Surgery of lumbar spine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

anesthesia

general anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

naropin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients planned for laminectomy or back surgery with lumbar pedicle screw placement or revision back surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* patient refusal, bleeding disorder, infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr M. B. Breebaart

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

margaretha breebaart, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Antwerp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AZ KLina

Brasschaat, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status

University Hospital Antwerp

Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC nr 17/09/097

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Erector Spinae Block for Spine Surgery
NCT05417113 TERMINATED PHASE4
GA + ESP vs. SA + ESP in Lumbar Decompression Surgeries
NCT05444751 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE3
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Renal Colic
NCT05323175 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4