Regional Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05029726

Last Updated: 2025-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

125 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-01

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Opioid overuse is a widespread public health crisis in the United States with increasing rates of addiction and overdose deaths from prescription opioids. Reducing the need for opiate analgesics in the post-operative setting has become a high priority in minimizing long-term opioid use in surgical patients. This study will serve to demonstrate the efficacy of the addition of regional analgesic techniques in reducing post-operative opioid requirements in patients undergoing common lumbar spinal surgical procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Opioid abuse and misuse remain a public health crisis in the United States, notably in patients with chronic pain from degenerative spine disease. Perioperative pain management for patients undergoing spinal surgery remains largely reliant on opioid medications, with several known adverse effects including, but not limited to delirium, postoperative urinary retention (POUR), constipation and nausea. These side effects contribute to increased hospital length of stay (LOS) with increased incidence of overall in-hospital complications, perioperative costs, and increased rates of opioid habituation and addiction.

Dependence on prescription opioids has been associated with wide-ranging social and economic consequences including increased opioid overdose resulting in death, growing opioid-related incarcerations, and spiraling opioid-related healthcare cost from treatment of addiction, opioid-related mental health issues, and debilitating chronic pain. Long-term requirements for opioid medications may be associated with the use of higher doses of opioids in the perioperative period for patients undergoing invasive surgery for spinal degenerative conditions. Studies have demonstrated that patients who consume fewer opioids for 30 days after surgery are less likely to progress to become chronic opioid users. Regional analgesic techniques have shown promise in decreasing post-operative pain and opioid requirements in thoracic and abdominal surgery but difficulties with post-operative neurological assessments have limited their use in spinal surgery. Inter-fascial plane blocks, however, have emerged as a safe and potentially useful regional analgesic technique to mitigate the pain-inducing effects of posterior spine surgery.

Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (ESPBs), specifically, involve ultra-sound guided injection of local anesthetic (LA) posteriorly beneath the erector spinae muscles resulting in longitudinal and ventrolateral spread of the anesthetic into the paravertebral space where the ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerves are located thereby inducing a multi-level analgesic effect. Depending upon the LA used, this effect may last for 4 to 36 hours.

The proposed study will examine the efficacy of preoperative ESPBs in reducing post-operative opioid utilization and its associated complications specifically after minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar spine surgery including both decompressive and instrumented fusion procedures. The guiding principle of MIS spine surgery is reduction of iatrogenic injury by utilizing muscle dilating approaches and tubular retractors rather than conventional open, subperiosteal muscle stripping techniques. The latter typically results in muscle denervation and devascularization as well as postoperative muscle atrophy and dead space creation that increase postoperative pain, muscle dysfunction, prolonged recovery times and complications. Since MIS spinal surgical procedures preserve normal paraspinal musculature compared to open surgery, the magnitude of effect of ESPBs may actually be more pronounced in this population.

The investigators hypothesize that by conducting this investigation within the rigor of a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, the results will definitively demonstrate that the addition of regional analgesia in the form of ESPB during MIS lumbar spine surgery will 1) reduce post-operative opioid consumption and 2) reduce opioid-related complications and hospital LOS but 3) have no adverse effects on postoperative pain control.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Lumbar Disc Herniation Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Lumbar Spondylosis Lumbar Radiculopathy Lumbar Spine Instability Synovial Cyst Degenerative Disc Disease Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Degenerative Intervertebral Discs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All patients will undergo surgery using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) multi-modal anesthesia protocol that is currently in standard use for MIS lumbar spine surgical procedures. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to investigational and control arms.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Patients, surgeons and anesthesiologists will all be blinded to treatment allocation. Syringes containing the fluid to be injected will be prepared by pharmacy and labeled with subject number in such a manner to blind the anesthesiologist performing the ESPB to its contents.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Investigational

Patients will undergo regional ESPB with bupivacaine plus clonidine in the holding area of the OR immediately prior to surgery. 30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine/1:200,000 epinephrine/50mcg clonidine will be administered bilaterally (total 60ml) to the lumbar paraspinal erector spine plane using ultrasound-guidance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution plus clonidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 plus clonidine 50 micrograms in 30cc syringes administered as ESPB

Control

Patients will receive a placebo injection of normal saline via the same ESPB technique. 30ml of normal saline will be administered bilaterally (total 60ml) to the lumbar paraspinal erector spine plane using ultrasound-guidance.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline in 30cc syringes administered using ESPB technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution plus clonidine

Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 plus clonidine 50 micrograms in 30cc syringes administered as ESPB

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline

normal saline in 30cc syringes administered using ESPB technique

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-80
* Undergoing one of 3 procedure types: 1) 2 or more levels of MIS decompression (e.g., discectomy, foraminotomy, laminectomy); 2) 1-3 levels of MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (with or without additional levels of MIS decompression for no greater than 3 total operative levels); 3) 1-3 levels of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or MIS lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) accompanied by posterior percutaneous instrumentation at the same levels
* Willing and able to give consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Opioid tolerant at the time of the surgical procedure--defined as consuming greater than 30mg of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) daily (https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribing/guideline.html)
* Presence of an indwelling pain device (e.g., intrathecal opioid pump, spinal cord stimulator, dorsal root ganglion stimulator)
* Known allergy to bupivacaine, clonidine or similar local anesthetics
* Indication for surgery other than degenerative disease (e.g., neoplasm, infection, trauma)
* Chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or greater), or hepatic failure
* Active pregnancy
* Disease process or mental illness that would preclude accurate evaluation of pain in the perioperative period
* Active Worker's Compensation litigation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

John O'Toole

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John O'Toole

Professor of Neurosurgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John O'Toole, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rush University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bart Jacher

Role: CONTACT

(888) 352-7874

Morgan Mulcahy

Role: CONTACT

(888) 352-7874

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bart Jacher

Role: primary

(888) 352-7874

Morgan Mulcahy

Role: backup

(888) 352-7874

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chin KJ, Lewis S. Opioid-free Analgesia for Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Blocks in a Multimodal Anesthetic Regimen. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):E379-E383. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002855.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30180150 (View on PubMed)

Chin KJ, Dinsmore MJ, Lewis S, Chan V. Opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia with bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a case report of two patients. Eur Spine J. 2020 Dec;29(Suppl 2):138-144. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06133-8. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31482311 (View on PubMed)

Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27501016 (View on PubMed)

Melvin JP, Schrot RJ, Chu GM, Chin KJ. Low thoracic erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgery: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;65(9):1057-1065. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1145-8. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29704223 (View on PubMed)

Singh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):330-334. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31033625 (View on PubMed)

Ueshima H, Inagaki M, Toyone T, Otake H. Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):254-257. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0114. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30424594 (View on PubMed)

van den Broek RJC, van de Geer R, Schepel NC, Liu WY, Bouwman RA, Versyck B. Evaluation of adding the Erector spinae plane block to standard anesthetic care in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87374-w.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33828209 (View on PubMed)

Armaghani SJ, Lee DS, Bible JE, Archer KR, Shau DN, Kay H, Zhang C, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ. Preoperative opioid use and its association with perioperative opioid demand and postoperative opioid independence in patients undergoing spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 1;39(25):E1524-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000622.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25417827 (View on PubMed)

Kalakoti P, Hendrickson NR, Bedard NA, Pugely AJ. Opioid Utilization Following Lumbar Arthrodesis: Trends and Factors Associated With Long-term Use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Sep 1;43(17):1208-1216. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002734.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30045343 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ORA20050502

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GA + ESP vs. SA + ESP in Lumbar Decompression Surgeries
NCT05444751 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE3