Effects of Intra-Operative Ropivaciane Epidural Injection on Post-Operative Outcomes Following Elective Lumbar Fusion

NCT ID: NCT03035656

Last Updated: 2019-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

228 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The following is a double blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial to test the hypothesis that a single epidural injection of Ropivaciane® intra operatively will:1) Single intra-operative epidural injection of Ropivaciane® will result in decreased postoperative pain and opioid use in both minimally invasive (MIS) and open lumbar fusion patients; 2) Decreased postoperative pain will lead to improved clinical outcomes; and 3) Elucidate if there are differences in pain management between MIS and open surgical procedures. The proposed study will add novel information to current knowledge by 1) exploring of the effects of intra-operative single epidural injection analgesic on patients receiving MIS compared to open surgery, and 2) investigate potential immediate and short-term functional improvements gained from intra-operative single injection of Ropivaciane®.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This double blinded, randomized clinical trial will test hypotheses by administering a single epidural injection prior to wound closure of either Ropivaciane® or saline.All pre-surgical activities and anesthesia will proceed as usual, with the addition of a single epidural injection immediately prior to wound closure 2 levels, or 10cm above the operated spinal level. Experimental groups will receive 0.2% Ropivaciane® (10 ml; dose shown to be effective without transient weakness), 9 and the control group will receive 0.9% saline solution (10 ml). Accurate placement into the space will be verified by the injection of contrast medium (iohexol, 180 mgl/ml) under fluoroscopic guidance. Epidural solutions will be prepared prior to surgery by pharmacy and coded; surgeons will administer according to the patient's code maintaining the double-blind procedure. It is important to note that treatment as usual differs between open and MIS cohorts. The question of interest is whether the addition of the epidural analgesic to current practices for each surgery type results in increased positive outcomes, whether this is due to synergistic effects or not. Following operative treatment, Foley Urinary catheter will be removed 24 hours post-operatively, unless otherwise clinically indicated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients are randomized into either the experimental arm (administration of Ropivaciane) or the control arm (administration of saline).
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Randomization of arms are conducted by the pharmacy department, and drug or saline preparation are prepared by the pharmacy department.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Administration of epidural Ropivaciane

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of Ropivaciane via epidural injection intra-operatively

Control

Administration of saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type OTHER

Administration of saline via epidural injection intra-operatively

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

Administration of Ropivaciane via epidural injection intra-operatively

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

Administration of saline via epidural injection intra-operatively

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consenting participants undergoing elective 1-2 level lumbar fusion through the Canada East Spine Centre

Exclusion Criteria

* History of severe respiratory, renal or hepatic disease
* Previous spine surgery
* Known allergy to local anaesthesia
* Those who experience dural tear during operative procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Horizon Health Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. neil Manson

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neil A Manson, MD FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Canada East Spine Centre; Horizon Health Network Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery

Edward P Abraham, MD FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Canada East Spine Centre; Horizon Health Network Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Erin E Bigney, BA MA

Role: CONTACT

506 648 6028

Eden A Richardson, BA

Role: CONTACT

506 648 6116

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Raw DA, Beattie JK, Hunter JM. Anaesthesia for spinal surgery in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;91(6):886-904. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg253.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14633762 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1921-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14667752 (View on PubMed)

Gessler F, Mutlak H, Tizi K, Senft C, Setzer M, Seifert V, Weise L. Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia in patients with spondylodiscitis and posterior spinal fusion surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):965-70. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15415. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26849711 (View on PubMed)

Hallivis R, Derksen TA, Meyr AJ. Peri-operative pain management. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008 Jul;25(3):443-63; vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2008.02.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18486854 (View on PubMed)

Sandkuhler J. Fear the pain. Lancet. 2002 Aug 10;360(9331):426. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09683-6. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12241712 (View on PubMed)

Carr DB, Goudas LC. Acute pain. Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2051-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03313-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10376632 (View on PubMed)

Breivik H. Postoperative pain management: why is it difficult to show that it improves outcome? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998 Nov;15(6):748-51. doi: 10.1097/00003643-199811000-00022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9884866 (View on PubMed)

Gottschalk A, Freitag M, Tank S, Burmeister MA, Kreil S, Kothe R, Hansen-Algenstedt N, Weisner L, Staude HJ, Standl T. Quality of postoperative pain using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter after major lumbar spinal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):175-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15220788 (View on PubMed)

Kang H, Jung HJ, Lee JS, Yang JJ, Shin HY, Song KS. Early postoperative analgesic effects of a single epidural injection of ropivacaine administered preoperatively in posterior lumbar interbody spinal arthrodesis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 6;95(5):393-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01729.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23467861 (View on PubMed)

Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18443635 (View on PubMed)

Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Oct;42(10):891-903. doi: 10.1007/BF03011037.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8706199 (View on PubMed)

Kluba T, Hofmann F, Bredanger S, Blumenstock G, Niemeyer T. Efficacy of post-operative analgesia after posterior lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative disc disease: a prospective randomized comparison of epidural catheter and intravenous administration of analgesics. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010 Mar 20;2(1):e9. doi: 10.4081/or.2010.e9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21808704 (View on PubMed)

Liu SS, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC, Thirlby RC, Rupp SM, Shine TS, Feinglass NG, Metzger PP, Fulmer JT, Smith SL. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995 Oct;83(4):757-65. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199510000-00015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7574055 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9175983 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of "multimodal" or "balanced analgesia" in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg. 1993 Nov;77(5):1048-56. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00030. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8105724 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002 Jun;183(6):630-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12095591 (View on PubMed)

Mathiesen O, Dahl B, Thomsen BA, Kitter B, Sonne N, Dahl JB, Kehlet H. A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2089-96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2826-1. Epub 2013 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23681498 (View on PubMed)

Woolf CJ, Chong MS. Preemptive analgesia--treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg. 1993 Aug;77(2):362-79. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199377020-00026. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8346839 (View on PubMed)

Woolf CJ. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of acute pain. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Aug;63(2):139-46. doi: 10.1093/bja/63.2.139. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2669905 (View on PubMed)

Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Audette J, Baron R, Gourlay GK, Haanpaa ML, Kent JL, Krane EJ, Lebel AA, Levy RM, Mackey SC, Mayer J, Miaskowski C, Raja SN, Rice AS, Schmader KE, Stacey B, Stanos S, Treede RD, Turk DC, Walco GA, Wells CD. Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Mar;85(3 Suppl):S3-14. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0649.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20194146 (View on PubMed)

Attal N, Cruccu G, Baron R, Haanpaa M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Nurmikko T. EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1113-e88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20402746 (View on PubMed)

Prasartritha T, Kunakornsawat S, Tungsiripat R, Jampa J, Throngnumchai R. A prospective randomized trial comparing epidural morphine through intraoperatively placed epidural catheter and intravenous morphine in major lumbar spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Dec;23(8):e43-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181cd3048.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20924294 (View on PubMed)

Peters CL, Shirley B, Erickson J. The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16950075 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Buenaventura RM, Manchikanti KN, Ruan X, Gupta S, Smith HS, Christo PJ, Ward SP. Effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2012 May-Jun;15(3):E199-245.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22622912 (View on PubMed)

Benyamin RM, Manchikanti L, Parr AT, Diwan S, Singh V, Falco FJ, Datta S, Abdi S, Hirsch JA. The effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain. Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):E363-404.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22828691 (View on PubMed)

Muller M, Burger C, Andermahr J, Mader K, Rangger C. [Spondylodiscitis after perioperative peridural catheter]. Anaesthesist. 2004 Dec;53(12):1189-94. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0764-3. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15597159 (View on PubMed)

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17695343 (View on PubMed)

Vianin M. Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Chiropr Med. 2008 Dec;7(4):161-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2008.07.001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19646379 (View on PubMed)

Luo X, George ML, Kakouras I, Edwards CL, Pietrobon R, Richardson W, Hey L. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15):1739-45. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083169.58671.96.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12897502 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-2380

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Erector Spinae Block for Spine Surgery
NCT05417113 TERMINATED PHASE4