Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block

NCT ID: NCT05320718

Last Updated: 2025-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting has recently gained with popularity in treatment of coronary artery disease. Compared with conventional approach, it has advantages of less trauma and rapid recovery, but postoperative pain is severe, which may increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications and cause chronic pain. Therefore, perioperative analgesia is crucial in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia Anesthesia, Local Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

erector spinae plane block

A needle is inserted until the tip contacted the T5 transverse process under ultrasound guidance. After confirming the needle tip position, 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected in the plane between the erector spinae muscles and transverse process. A catheter is inserted through the needle and then connected to a Programmed Electronic Postoperative Analgesia Pump with a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus and a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

thoracic paravertebral block

A needle is inserted into the paravertebral space. After confirming the needle tip position, 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine is injected in the paravertebral space. A catheter is inserted through the needle and then connected to a Programmed Electronic Postoperative Analgesia Pump with a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus and a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus and a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients undergoing elective minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindications to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, infection of the skin at the site of needle puncture area, et al)
2. Morbid obesity (body mass index \> 35 kg/m2)
3. Allergy to any of the study drugs
4. Chronic opioid use or history of opioid abuse.
5. Inability to understand pain score
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Municipal Health Commission

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Min Li

Vice Director of the Department of Anesthesiology, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Min Li, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University Third Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology,Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Peking University Third Hosptial

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH. Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31280100 (View on PubMed)

Saadawi M, Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Leurcharusmee P, Tran Q. Erector spinae plane block: A narrative review with systematic analysis of the evidence pertaining to clinical indications and alternative truncal blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110063. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110063. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33032124 (View on PubMed)

Huang W, Wang W, Xie W, Chen Z, Liu Y. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Nov;66:109900. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109900. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32502778 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESPB vs PVB for MIDCAB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.